Ethnic Customary Law in relation to political, military and security issues (original) (raw)
Related papers
Kazakhstan: Adat-The Traditional Conflict Management Mechanism in Central Asia
2021
The following article is based on the three principles of the anthropology of law and portrays the experiences of the Chechens and the meaning of their cultural norms, especially in case of conflicts and conflict management, back home and inside a foreign country – Kazakhstan – and sometimes in a clash with the Sharia law and the federal/republican one. More specifically, this article will focus on Adat – norms of local customary law – in the traditional Chechen society. This study was developed in Karaganda (Kazakhstan) with the help of the data and information provided by the Chechen Veteran’s Council in Kazakhstan and the vice-dean of the Law Faculty in Karaganda and it found out that conflicts can be addressed through the extension of existing alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. Keywords: Adat, mediation, teip, tukkhum, Kazakhstan, customary law, legal anthropology.
7. Sharia and national law in Afghanistan
Sharia Incorporated, 2010
Legal pluralism is the hallmark of Afghan legal reality. Afghan law is a combination of Islamic law, state legislation, and local customary law. This chapter traces the origins of that plurality and shows that the lack of clarity regarding the relationship between these different sources of law and the absence of guidelines as how to resolve conflicts between them is still causing many problems in Afghanistan today. Despite the existence of official law, i.e. the formal legal system established under the provisions of a constitution, the socio-legal reality is not reflected by it, and the law in the books does not represent the norms that actually govern the lives of the majority of the population. For ordinary people and villagers, who form the majority of the populace, tribal/customary and Islamic law are more significant and actually better known than any state legislation. As a result, in Afghanistan it is not the implications of sharia or sharia-based law that, at least for the moment, prevents the application and implementation of international legal and human rights standards, but the lack of a system by which the rule of law may be established so that the legal system is capablepractically, socially, politicallyof guaranteeing and enforcing laws effectively. Although the Government of Afghanistan is committed to carrying out its duties imposed not only by Afghanistan's domestic laws but also by the country's international obligations, the greatest challenge to action is the lack of security and the fragile peace balance in the country.
Adoption of Ethnic Customary System (Adat) in Modern Confliction Resolution
TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DESIGN ART AND COMMUNICATION, 2018
Modern mediation needs the ethnic cultural tradition of conflict disputes resolution as a model, and Indonesia is rich of ethnic cultural mediation which basically can be adopted in resolving disputes. Additionally, customary law (Adat) as a legal system has its own pattern in resolving disputes. This paper sought the customary law in conflict resolution which was based on the ethnic culture mediation practices. Adat practices in mediation that had been derived from values, patterns of thoughts and norms noware getting rise to be fundamental sources of national law.Dispute resolution through customary law mechanisms had been done through deliberations that shaped the form of mediation, negotiation, facilities and arbitration. These four models of dispute settlement had been often practiced by indigenous peoples in resolving their disputes. Therefore, customary law (adat) communities have religious, communal, democratic and spiritual values.The philosophy of disputes settlement among...
Crime of Aggression against Ukraine: The Role of Regional Customary Law. The Role of Regional Customary Law, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2023, vol. 21(3), 435-459, 2023
In the discourse around prosecution of perpetrators of the crime of aggression against Ukraine, there is a need to consider the impact of Eastern European regional norms, both treaty-based and customary. This concerns both the interpretation of principles of responsibility for the crime of aggression as well as the modes of prosecution thereof. The article argues that, in Eastern Europe, the crime of aggression is a well established norm of international and national law, and aggression — as a conduct by a state — is defined based on the principle of first use of force, while political, economic and any other justifications in order to avoid responsibility are disallowed. Individual responsibility for the crime of aggression represents a departure from the International Criminal Court’s Rome Statute standard and is instead based on the International Military Tribunal’s Charter, which limits its scope to responsibility for a war of aggression. At the same time, it does not preclude, for example, prosecution of those responsible for the administration of occupied territories. As a consequence, the leadership clause might be understood as broader in comparison to the Rome Statute standards.