Threat Assessment (original) (raw)
Related papers
Strategic Thinking in Criminal Intelligence …, 2008
Law enforcement agencies around the world differ widely in how they identify, assess and prioritise threats and risks posed by various crimes and criminal groups. Analytical methods within criminal intelligence are typically divided into two broadly overlapping categories-qualitative and quantitative techniques. "Hard" quantitative techniques are sometimes privileged over "soft" qualitative as having more rigour with numerically measurable results. However, qualitative analysis can, and often should, encompass structured methodologies to logically assess problems in a systematic way. There is value to the integration of both qualitative and quantitative techniques into a structured approach to assess threats and risks.
2013
The definition of those terms without a specific source reference is based on the common usage in the field of threat management.
A Systems thinking approach to threat assessment
The foundational premise of this paper is that threats exist in a complex and dynamic system of relationships. This system of relationships (SoR) exists between a threat, a target, an environment and an observer. Applying systems thinking to threat assessment provides key insights for intelligence practitioners into the complex nature of threat problems and assessments. Within the intelligence discipline the typical approach to threat assessments is ‘red centric’: focusing mostly on threat, with assumed considerations about targets, and their environment. Also, this approach is mostly analytical in nature, sitting in isolation of broader contexts, and not necessarily recognising the validity of other more synthetic approaches. This paper proposes that there should be a broader, synthesized approach to dealing with threats and threat assessments, which recognises that the observer is not outside but part of the flow of influence into the system of relationships, observing changes in the relationships and orienting observations accordingly.
Safe and Secure Cyber-Physical Systems and Internet-of-Things Systems, 2019
This chapter develops models for the unified analysis of security vulnerabilities and safety hazards that constitute various forms of threats to security and safety. A unified view of threats leads to understand that these threats can come from design flaws and faults at many levels of abstraction:
The Practice of Campus-Based Threat Assessment: An Overview
Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 2012
This article provides an overview of threat assessment and management as implemented on campuses of higher education. Standards of practice and state calls for implementation are cited. An overview of some of the basic principles for threat assessment and management implementation is accompanied by examples of how they are utilized. Pitfalls inherent to threat assessment and management and suggested remedies are outlined. Finally, there is a brief introduction for the articles that follow in this special section.
Assessing Threat Scenarios: Severity, Mitigation, Capability and Response
2011
Terrorism is generally viewed as: "the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of social, political, economic or religious aims." Today's corporations face increasing threats from foreign and domestic groups. These threats can be exerted both physically and financially, both in real space as well in cyber space. Threats can be generated both by terror groups as well as those operating merely for personal financial gains. In this paper we provide a novel methodology for dealing with threats, assessing their scope, mitigating their impact, and generating proper feasible responses. This phase is followed by screening those generated options into a set of responses in line with current capabilities and time constraints.
We propose a knowledge-based public health situation awareness system. The basis for this system is an explicit representation of public health situation awareness concepts and their interrelationships. This representation is based upon the users" (public health decision makers) cognitive model of the world, and optimized towards the efficacy of performance and relevance to the public health situation awareness processes and tasks. In our approach, explicit domain knowledge is the foundation for interpretation of public health data, as apposed to conventional systems where the statistical methods are the essence of the processes. Objectives: To develop a prototype knowledge-based system for public health situation awareness and to demonstrate the utility of knowledge intensive approaches in integration of heterogeneous information, eliminating the effects of incomplete and poor quality surveillance data, uncertainty in syndrome and aberration detection and visualization of comp...