Book review: Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan, The Protection of Intellectual Property in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2016) 544 pp (original) (raw)
Related papers
National Legal Systems and Globalization
2013
No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
Annual Review of Sociology, 2006
Globalization of law may be defined as the worldwide progression of transnational legal structures and discourses along the dimensions of extensity, intensity, velocity, and impact. We propose that a theory of the global penetration of law will require at least four elements ...
Character, Method and Causes of Globalization of Law
Russian Journal of Comparative Law, 2018
The aim of this paper is to determine the character, method and causes of the globalization of law, that is, the contemporary phenomenon of the increasing harmonization of national legislations at a global level, primarily with international law, as well as with each other. In doing so, we have used the method of text analysis, formal-legal method, comparative method and statistical methods. The subject of our research is the relation between the general social process of globalization and the phenomenon of global harmonization of national legislations, in other words, the creation of the law proceeding from the harmonization of legal institutes, solutions and entire legal systems from international law or one country or culture, or to another country or culture, which is, in the legal theory, called "globalization of law". We have found that the character of the process of globalization of law should be positioned amongst the extreme views of the prominent authors in this field, and that the legal reception, primarily from international law, is the prevailing method of global harmonization of law. Also, the causes of the social process of globalization are simultaneously the causes of harmonization of national legislations at a global level. According to the type of factors, all causes of globalization of law are classified as objective and subjective. Furthermore, the characteristics of four groups of objective factors – technological, economic, political and cultural - have been presented, as well as significant examples. In addition to this, the characteristics of the group of subjective causes and the most significant factors of this group have been presented.
Legal method and lnterpretation in International IP law : Pluralism or Systemic Coherence
2019
While pluralism and minimum harmonisation may have advantages concerning substantive requirements for IP protection there is an argument to be made in favour of establishing further harmonisation concerning rules and principles for legal interpretation of international or regional IP treaties, conventions and other legal instruments. Increasing autonomy of IP Law as a legal discipline and the development of specialisation whiting different IP areas have resulted in different layers of sources of law, comprising specific scopes, validity and enforceability mechanisms. Specialised international, regional and national institutions are creating a body of ‘case-law’ following a specific set of interpretative logic, rules, principles or praxis.This paper reflects on policy options between pluralism and harmonization in two separate levels: (1) the desirability of establishing, or not further harmonization of interpretative rules, criteria and praxis in IP law; (2) whether internal harmoni...