2022_S. Kroll, J. Bendezu-Sarmiento, J. Lhuillier, E. Luneau, K. Kaniuth, M.Teufer.., N. Avanesova, D. Fiorillo, M. Tengberg, A. Sharifik, C. Bon, D. Bosch, M. Mashkour, Mobility and land use in the Greater Khorasan Civilization: Isotopic approaches on human populations from southern Central Asia. (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
The question of mobility of Bronze Age societies in southern Central Asia is a lively subject for discussion and remains a key aspect for understanding past human life. Central Asia represents a region where mobility and migration had a deep impact on the development of cultural communities. Surrounded by the great empires of the ancient Near East, it exhibited a high ethnic and genetic diversity. In this paper we present a regional study for southern Central Asia of isotopic analyses of 87 Sr/ 86 Sr and δ 18 O of human samples from several Bronze Age sites in southern Turkmenistan (Ulug Depe), south/central Uzbekistan (Dzharkutan, Sapallitepa, Tilla Bulak, Bustan and Bashman 1) and southern Tajikistan (Saridzhar, Gelot and Darnaichi). The three geographical zones manifest different patterns of mobility. The analysis of the Ulug Depe people demonstrates a high rate of immigration during the early periods (EBA) and a tendency for permanent residence. The later periods (MBA) are marked by a decrease in immigration and mobility, indicating a more extensive use of the surrounding landscape. Dzharkutan people displayed a different and complex pattern of mobility and subsistence, Manuscript File-tidy Click here to view linked References 2 with frequent movements during individual lifetime within a limited area. The other sites in the Surkhan Darya Valley and southern Tajikistan indicate active mobility in which individuals migrated within a wide area of southern Central Asia.
BRONZE AGE MIGRATIONS IN CENTRAL ASIA
The Bronze Age history of Central Asia was characterized by the presence of migrations, changes in socio-economic relations, assimilation processes and cultural interactions between different tribes. This article analyzes Bronze Age migrations in Central Asia basis on archaeological sources.
22 Central Asia: genetics and archaeology
The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration, 2013
The evolutionary history of modern humans has been characterized by range expansions, colonizations and recurrent migrations over the last 100,000 years . Some regions of the world served as natural corridors between landmasses and are of particular importance in the history of human migrations. Central Asia was probably at the crossroads of several such migration routes . It encompasses a vast territory, stretching from the Pamir and Tian Shan mountains in the east to the Caspian Sea in the west; limited to the north by the Russian taiga and to the south by the Iranian deserts and Afghan mountains. The rather uniform low-relief, treeless topography of the Eurasian steppe, mostly unsuitable for rain-based agriculture, facilitated potential contact and movements between human groups. But the archaeological record of this region indicates that the movements and contacts varied in type, intensity, and nature during different prehistoric epochs .
The Formation of Human Populations in South and Central Asia One Page Summary
Science, 2019
Introduction and Rationale: To elucidate the extent to which the major cultural transformations of farming, pastoralism and shifts in the distribution of languages in Eurasia were accompanied by movement of people, we report genome-wide ancient DNA data from 523 individuals spanning the last 8000 years mostly from Central Asia and northernmost South Asia.
Migration Concepts in Eurasian Archaeology - Ann. Rev. Anthro 2011
Theories of migration hold a pervasive position in prehistoric archaeology of Central Eurasia. International research on Eurasia today reflects the juxtaposition of archaeological theory and practice from distinct epistemological traditions, and migration is at the crux of current debates. Migration was employed paradigmatically during the Soviet era to explain the geography and materiality of prehistoric ethnogenesis, whereas in the west it was harshly criticized in prehistoric applications, especially in the 1970s. Since the dissolution of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), migration has resurfaced as an important, yet polemical, explanation in both academic arenas. Short-and longdistance population movements are seen as fundamental mechanisms for the formation and distribution of regional archaeological cultures from the Paleolithic to historical periods and as a primary social response to environmental, demographic, and political pressures. Critics view the archaeological record of Eurasia as a product of complex local and regional interaction, exchange, and innovation, reinvigorating essential debates around migration, diffusion, and autochthonous change in Eurasian prehistory.
Central Asia: genetics and archaeology
The evolutionary history of modern humans has been characterized by range expansions, colonizations and recurrent migrations over the last 100,000 years . Some regions of the world served as natural corridors between landmasses and are of particular importance in the history of human migrations. Central Asia was probably at the crossroads of several such migration routes . It encompasses a vast territory, stretching from the Pamir and Tian Shan mountains in the east to the Caspian Sea in the west; limited to the north by the Russian taiga and to the south by the Iranian deserts and Afghan mountains. The rather uniform low-relief, treeless topography of the Eurasian steppe, mostly unsuitable for rain-based agriculture, facilitated potential contact and movements between human groups. But the archaeological record of this region indicates that the movements and contacts varied in type, intensity, and nature during different prehistoric epochs .
Migrations and Ethnocultural Processes in Central Asia (Eneolithic and Bronze Age
2021
The ancient history of Central Asia features migrations, assimilation processes and cultural interactions between different tribes. This article elaborates on migrations and ethnocultural processes in Central Asia in the middle of the Eneolithic and Bronze Ages. Analysing the archaeological artefacts connected with ancient cultures of Central Asia is essential to reconstruct the migration and ethnocultural processes. Therefore, the main attention is drawn to the reasons and results of migrations and ethnocultural development in Central Asia. The methods applied include reviewing historical sources, historical and comparative analysis, chronological method, analysis of approaches and scientific views on the research topic.