Usage of the terms "likewise" and "like" in texts for algorithms. Algorithmic analogies in ancient China (original) (raw)

Interpreting Algorithms Written in Chinese and Attempting the Reconstitution of Tabular Setting: Some Elements of Comparative History

The mathematics of 12th-14th-century China is known for its beautiful algebraic texts. Unfortunately, information concerning their context of transmission and instruction is scarce. One interesting pattern is that many of the texts share a predisposition for tabular setting and several of these texts refer to the same algebraic procedure named tian yuan 天元 (Celestial Source) used to set up polynomial equations. The setting of these equations on a counting surface is the result of a specificity of using counting rods for the algorithm of division. Precisely, the role of division for setting up and solving equations is fundamental to the algorithm. This chapter presents an excerpt borrowed from Li Ye's 李冶 Yigu yanduan 益古演段 (the Development of Pieces [of Area according to the Collection] Augmenting the Ancient [Knowledge], 1259). It presents first a basic example of the Celestial Source procedure, then attempts reconstitution of poly-nomials on the counting surface and ends with comparative observations related to the chapter on the Bījagaṇitāvataṃsa (BGA) written by Nārāyaṇa in 14th-century India. The description of the algorithm for setting up a quadratic equation is interesting from a comparative perspective. The way in which lists of operations are ordered shows that Indian and Chinese authors had different interests, addressed different difficulties and understood mathematical concepts differently, while referring to division, using tabular setting and "model" equations.

Semantic Aspects of Classical Chinese Analogies and Structural Thought Patterns

Specific Chinese logical reasoning was mainly not focused on explicit elaborations of systematic or coherent formulations of the universal rational laws. In its prevailing form it did not produce any comprehensive system of symbolism for abstract or formally expressible thought. In China, logical thought was always linked to the language, especially to its semantic aspects, and was determined by its close connection to ethics. The fact that analogies were extremely important in traditional Chinese logic is clearly evidenced by most of the influential works of the ancient period. The article explores the connection between specific Chinese analogies and the relational or structural paradigms of specific ancient Chinese reasoning.

A Summation Algorithm from 11th Century China. Possible Relations Between Structure and Argument

Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2008

Mathematical writings in China relied entirely on the algorithmic mode to express sequences of operations, to justify the correctness of these, and to bring mathematical objects in relation one to another. In this paper, I shall use one example to show how the structural elements in an algorithm convey a mathematical meaning and can be interpreted in the light of the ancient Chinese geometrical tradition. The example stems from an 11th century text by Shen Gua 沈括 and calculates the number of kegs of wine piled up in the form of a truncated pyramid with a rectangular base.

The Algorithm Concept - Tool for Historiographic Interpretation or Red Herring?

2008

With starting point in Donald Knuth’s paper “Ancient Babylonian Algorithms”, and using the algebraic reading of pre-Modern mathematical texts as a parallel, the paper discusses the relevance of the algorithm concept, on one hand as an analytical tool for the understanding and comparison of mathematical procedures, on the other as a possible key to how pre-Modern reckoners thought their mathematics and to how they thought about it.

What Did They Mean by "Calculation Principles"?: Revisiting Argumentative Styles in Late Ming to Mid- Qing Chinese Mathematics

This article discusses the influence that two versions of the Elements had in Ming and Qing China as well as Chinese scholars’ efforts to “integrate” (huitong 會通) Western and Chinese mathematics into a unified system in terms of argumentative styles in mathematics. Although much high praise was given to the axiomatic-deductive system of Euclid’s Elements, numerical arguments and problem-solving remain important traits in the works of Chinese scholars. The compilation of the Shuli jingyun 數理精蘊 and the inclusion of another version of the Elements in it again prompted East Asian mathematicians to reflect more upon their methods of argumentation, and later scholars began to write texts whose arguments are more abstract than numerical. This paper presents examples taken from the works of several representative scholars from the late Ming to the mid-Qing periods to argue that their efforts of huitong produced argumentative styles that are a combination of both Chinese and Western approaches, and that there was a trend of moving from concrete calculations to general arguments in mathematical texts throughout the course of history. Finally, the authors conclude that what 17th and 18th century Chinese mathematicians meant by “calculation principles” (suanli 算理) was never the kind of pure deduction in the Euclidean manner, but a combination of induction and deduction, with the help of intuition, for the purpose of problem-solving.

mathematics of ancient China

2007

Many pieces of evidence converge towards the conclusion that generality was the main theoretical value prized by the practitioners of mathematics in ancient China and that it was valued more than abstraction (Chemla 2003). More precisely, these scholars regularly aimed at the greatest generality possible, but did not always achieve or express it through abstract terms. This does not mean, however, that abstraction played no role for them and that they did not find it necessary in some cases to carry out operations of abstraction. In fact, the earliest Chinese mathematical sources handed down through the written tradition, The Gnomon of the Zho1 u (Zho1 ubı4 , probably 1 st century C. E., Cullen 1996), The Nine Chapters on Mathematical Procedures (Jiu3 zha1 ng sua4 nshu4 , below: The Nine Chapters; probably 1 st century C. E.), 1 as well as their commentaries, bear witness to several uses of abstraction. On the other hand, the relationship between generality and abstraction that they evince differs from what can be found in, say, Euclid's Elements. 2 In correlation with this, both the generality

Reading instructions of the past, classifying them, and reclassifying them: commentaries on the canon The Nine Chapters on Mathematical Procedures from the third to the thirteenth centuries

BJHS Themes, 2020

This essay approaches the knowledge required to write up and use instructions with a specific method. It relies on specific procedures taken from the Chinese canon The Nine Chapters on Mathematical Procedures (九章算術), which, in the author's view, was completed in the first century CE. These procedures enabled readers to do things. To analyse the type of knowledge required to produce these texts of procedures and to use them, the essay puts into play two layers of commentary. The ancient layer was written between the third and the seventh centuries, whereas the later layer was composed between the eleventh and the thirteenth centuries. The author shows that these two layers of commentary read the same text of procedure differently, using different approaches and understanding it differently. The author also shows how the two layers of commentary use mathematical problems to approach a procedure, even though problems are used differently in the two contexts. This illustrates how, i...