The history of the domestic cat in Central Europe (original) (raw)

Project Gallery

The history of the domestic cat in Central Europe

Magdalena Krajcarz 1{ }^{1}, Maciej T. Krajcarz 2{ }^{2} (D), Mateusz Baca 3{ }^{3} (D), Michał Golubiński 3{ }^{3} (D), Zora Bielichová 4{ }^{4} (D), Jelena Bulatović 5,6{ }^{5,6} (D), Péter Csippán 7{ }^{7} (D), Vesna Dimitrijević 5{ }^{5} (D), René Kyselý 8{ }^{8} (D), Daniel Makowiecki 1{ }^{1} (D), Adrian Marciszak 9{ }^{9} (D), Nemanja Marković 10{ }^{10} (D), Mladen Mladenović 5{ }^{5}, Wim Van Neer 11,12{ }^{11,12} (D), Theodor Obada 13{ }^{13}, Ivana Živaljević 14{ }^{14} (D), Aleksandar Bulatović 10{ }^{10}, Vujadin Ivanišević 10{ }^{10}, Stefan Pop-Lazićc 10{ }^{10}, Dušan Mihailovićc 5{ }^{5}, Adam Ostasz 15{ }^{15}, Kristina Penezićc 14{ }^{14}, Nenad Tasićc 5{ }^{5}, Perica Špehar 5{ }^{5}, Jarosław Wilczyński 16{ }^{16} & Danijela Popović 3,∗{ }^{3, *} (D)

[1]1{ }^{1} Institute of Archaeology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
2{ }^{2} Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
3{ }^{3} Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Poland
4{ }^{4} Institute of Archaeology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Nitra, Slovakia
5{ }^{5} Department of Archaeology, University of Belgrade, Serbia
6{ }^{6} Department of Historical Studies, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
7{ }^{7} Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
8{ }^{8} Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
9{ }^{9} Department of Palaeozoology, University of Wrocław, Poland
10{ }^{10} Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade, Serbia
11{ }^{11} Operational Direction Earth and History of Life, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium
12{ }^{12} Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, University of Leuven, Belgium
13{ }^{13} Institute of Zoology, Republic of Moldova, National Museum of Ethnography and Natural History of Moldova, Chişinău, Moldova
14{ }^{14} BioSense Institute, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
15{ }^{15} Archaeological Museum in Gdańsk, Poland
16{ }^{16} Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland

• Author for correspondence ∝\propto d.popovic@cent.uw.edu.pl

A recent study from Central Europe has changed our perception of the cat’s domestication history. The authors discuss how this has led to the development of an interdisciplinary project combining palaeogenetics, zooarchaeology and radiocarbon dating, with the aim of providing insight into the domestic cat’s expansion beyond the Mediterranean.

Keywords: Felis, cat, domestication, zooarchaeology, palaeogenomics, radiocarbon dating

Introduction

The last two decades have fundamentally changed our understanding of cat domestication, primarily due to advances in palaeogenetic methods. Analyses of archaeological and modern felids have revealed the Near Eastern wildcat (Felis silvestris lybica) to be the common ancestor of all

[2]

1. 1 Institure of Archaeology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
   2{ }^{2} Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
   3{ }^{3} Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Poland
   4{ }^{4} Institute of Archaeology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Nitra, Slovakia
   5{ }^{5} Department of Archaeology, University of Belgrade, Serbia
   6{ }^{6} Department of Historical Studies, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
   7{ }^{7} Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
   8{ }^{8} Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
   9{ }^{9} Department of Palaeozoology, University of Wrocław, Poland
   10{ }^{10} Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade, Serbia
   11{ }^{11} Operational Direction Earth and History of Life, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium
   12{ }^{12} Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, University of Leuven, Belgium
   13{ }^{13} Institute of Zoology, Republic of Moldova, National Museum of Ethnography and Natural History of Moldova, Chişinău, Moldova
   14{ }^{14} BioSense Institute, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
   15{ }^{15} Archaeological Museum in Gdańsk, Poland
   16{ }^{16} Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
   ∗{ }^{*} Author for correspondence ∝\propto d.popovic@cent.uw.edu.pl ↩︎
2. Received: 20 April 2022; Revised: 25 August 2022; Accepted: 30 August 2022
   © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ↩︎

domestic cats (Driscoll et al. 2007; Ottoni et al. 2017). The primary domestication area was the Fertile Crescent, where wildcats were tamed around 10000 years ago (Clutton-Brock 1999; Vigne et al. 2004; Faure & Kitchener 2009; Ottoni et al. 2017; Vigne 2019). Subsequent evidence for cat domestication originates from Egypt around 3500 years ago and, for centuries, this served as the main hub for the worldwide spread of tamed/domesticated cats (Ottoni et al. 2017). Our understanding of later dispersal in the Mediterranean is limited (Faure & Kitchener 2009; Ottoni et al. 2017), however, and barely anything is known about migrations beyond this region. Recent data indicate a significant overlap in the appearance of house mice (Mus musculus) and cats in Late Neolithic Eastern Europe (Cucchi et al. 2020; Krajcarz et al. 2020), and suggest that the house mouse was an important factor for the dispersal of cats within Europe. Shipping and maritime trade are considered the most important factors for the spread of cats (Faure & Kitchener 2009), but their remains are relatively rare in the archaeological record before the Late Middle Ages (von den Driesch 1992). In Europe, the increased popularity of cats is discernible in the zooarchaeological record as late as the second half of the thirteenth century (Faure & Kitchener 2009).

The Five Thousand Years of History of Domestic Cat in Central Europe project

In 2016, we confirmed the appearance of domestic cats in Poland during the Roman period (Krajcarz et al. 2016) using a combination of zooarchaeology, genetics and absolute dating, pushing back their arrival by a millennium. We later demonstrated that cats bearing mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotypes of the Near Eastern wildcat were already present in Central Europe in the Early Neolithic (Baca et al. 2018), indicating that their dispersal into Central Europe was more complex than previously thought (Figures 1 & 2).

We set up the current project to investigate holistically the origins and dispersal of the domestic cat in Central Europe. It aims to expand our knowledge of the prehistory and early history of cats-that is, between their domestication in the Near East, earliest appearance in Central Europe, the later establishment of housecat populations during the Roman period, and the rapid increase of domestic cat populations in the late medieval period. The project also aims to identify phenotypic features related to domestication, such as: physical appearance, including body size and coat colour; behaviour, for example, reduced aggression; and possible physiological adaptations to digest anthropogenic food.

Our analyses combine palaeogenetics, including mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analysis, with zooarchaeology and direct radiocarbon dating. The goal is to elucidate high-resolution temporal changes in the genetic structure of past populations. Placing this information in a temporal and spatial framework will allow for the investigation of migration events and routes, as well as introgression events between the native European wildcat and domestic cat. A supra-regional database, which gathers mtDNA, nuclear DNA, morphometric, stratigraphic and radiocarbon data, is one of the planned outputs.

Preliminary results

The material collected thus far comprises more than 200 specimens from 102 sites (Figure 3) dating between the Late Pleistocene and modern period. Preliminary mtDNA results indicate

Figure 1. Simplified routes for the early expansion of Felis silvestris lybica across Europe (based on our direct dating of the earliest Felis bones from Poland and Serbia in combination with data from Vigne et al. 2004; Driscoll et al. 2007; Faure & Kitchener 2009; Krajcarz et al. 2016, 2020; Ottoni et al. 2017; Baca et al. 2018). Age ranges are radiocarbon ages in years BC/AD produced using OxCal v.4.4 (at 95.4% probability), calibrated using the IntCal20 calibration curve (Bronk Ramsey 2009; Reimer et al. 2020) (figure by M.T. Krajcarz, using source data from The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (https://www.iucnredlist.org/)),
that cats with the Near Eastern wildcat’s A1 haplotype were present in Central Europe prior to the Neolithic. It was previously assumed that this haplotype is characteristic of nondomesticated Near Eastern wildcats, and its first appearance in Europe was detected in Romania c. 7700 BC (Ottoni et al. 2017). Our data suggest that the range of the Near Eastern wildcat, or its hybrid zone with the European wildcat, could be much wider. We expect that ongoing nuclear DNA analyses will determine whether the observed range of the A1 haplotype is the result of natural gene flow between European and Near Eastern wildcats or an expansion of population.

Our preliminary morphometric results, focused on Poland, reveal a decreasing trend in cat body size from the Neolithic to the medieval period (Figure 4). Neolithic cats were large individuals and equal in size to European wildcats, whose size remained stable over time. Bitz-Thorsen and Gotfredsen (2018) found a similar trend within Bronze Age/Iron Age to

Figure 2. Selected mandibles of Near Eastern wildcats/domestic cats (a-f) and European wildcats ( g−ig-i ) (species attribution based on mtDNA): a) Poland, Miechów site 3 (Neolithic); b-c) Poland, Łajewo site 4 and Sławsko Wielkie site 16 (Roman period); d-e) Serbia, Carë̈in Grad site (Early Byzantine period); f) Poland, Miechów site 3 (Middle Ages); g) Poland, Perspektywiczna Cave (Neolithic); h) Poland, shelter in Smoleń III (pre-Roman period); i) Poland, Perspektywiczna Cave (Middle Ages) (photographs by M. Krajcarz).

Figure 3. Locations of archaeological and palaeontological sites from which cat remains have been collected for the project (figure by M.T. Krajcarz, using the base map generated in StepMap (https://www.stepmap.com/)).

Figure 4. Changes in cat bone size over time. The log-ratio values show relative size against the standard of modern domestic cats (Kratochvil 1976; O’Connor 2007). This allows comparison of measurements. Only long bones (humerus, ulna, radius, femur and tibia) from radiocarbon dated and mtDNA-identified specimens from Poland are used. NN equates to the number of individuals, while the number in parentheses represents the number of measurements taken from them. Boxes display the standard deviation, while the line inside each box represents the mean and the whiskers represent the total range (figure by M. Krajcarz and M.T. Krajcarz, the boxplot generated using Past 4, version 4.05 (http://www.nlm.uio.no/english/research/ resources/past/, Hammer et al. 2001)).

medieval cats from Denmark. As we are still collecting data from the southern study area (the Carpathians and Balkans), which is situated closer to the Near Eastern wildcat’s native range, more complex trends may eventually be recorded.

Funding statement

The Five Thousand Years of History of Domestic Cat in Central Europe: Interdisciplinary Study of Paleogenetics and Archaeozoology project is funded by the National Science Centre, Poland (grant no. 2019/35/B/HS3/02923).

References

Baca, M. et al. 2018. Human-mediated dispersal of cats in the Neolithic Central Europe. Heredity 121: 557-63.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-018-0071-4
Bitz-Thorsen, J. & A.B. Gotfredsen. 2018. Domestic cats (Felis catus) in Denmark have increased significantly in size since the Viking Age. Danish Journal of Archaeology 7: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2018\. 1546420
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51: 337-60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200033865
Clutton-Brock, J. 1999. A natural history of domesticated mammals. London: Natural History Museum.
Cucchi, T. et al. 2020. Tracking the Near Eastern origins and European dispersal of the western house mouse. Scientific Reports 10: 8276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64939-9 von den Driesch, A. 1992. Kulturgeschichte der Hauskatze, in V. Schmidt & M.C. Horzinek (ed.) Krankheiten der Katze: Bund 1: 17-40. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Driscoll, C.A. et al. 2007. The Near Eastern origin of cat domestication. Science 317: 519-23. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1139518
FauRe, E. & A.C. Kitchener. 2009. An archaeological and historical review of the relationships between felids and people. Anthrozoös 22: 221-38.
https://doi.org/10.2752/175303709X457577
Hammer, Ø. et al. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1.

Krajcarz, M. et al. 2016. On the trail of the oldest domestic cat in Poland: an insight from morphometry, ancient DNA and radiocarbon dating. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 26: 912-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa. 2471

• 1. Ancestors of domestic cats in Neolithic Central Europe: isotopic evidence of a synanthropic diet. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 117: 17710-19. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1918884117

Kratochvili, Z. 1976. Das Postkranialskelett der Wild- und Hauskatze (Felis silvestris und F. lybica f. catus). Acta Scientiarium Naturalium Brno 10: 1−431-43.
O’Connor, T.P. 2007. Wild or domestic? Biometric variation in the cat Felis silvestris Schreber. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 17: 581-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa. 913
Ottoni, C. et al. 2017. The palaeogenetics of cat dispersal in the ancient world. Nature Ecology and Evolution 1: 0139.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0139
REMER, P.J. et al. 2020. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve ( 0−550-55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62: 725-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.41
Vigne, J.D. 2019. The beginning of cat domestication in East and West Asia, in J. Peters, G. McGlynn & V. Goebel (ed.) Animals: cultural identifiers in ancient societies?: 343-54. Rahden: Marie Leidorf.
Vigne, J.D. et al. 2004. Early taming of the cat in Cyprus. Science 304: 259.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1095335