Provision of Non-audit Services by Auditors: Economic Efficiency or Managerial Opportunism? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Auditor Independence: Evidence on the Joint Effects of Auditor Tenure and Nonaudit Fees
Auditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory, 2007
This study examines whether the impact of non-audit fees on auditor independence is contingent on auditor tenure. The results, based on a sample of 4,720 U.S. firms for the years 2000 and 2001, show that there is a positive association between non-audit fees and positive discretionary current accruals, a proxy for auditor independence, for firms with short auditor tenure of not more than three years. These findings suggest that non-audit fees may impair auditor independence when auditor tenure is short and not when auditor tenure is long. Furthermore, exploratory analyses show that the positive association between non-audit fees and earnings management for firms with short auditor tenure is significant for small clients but not for large clients. Taken together, these results suggest that the association between non-audit fees and auditor independence is contingent upon auditor tenure, and that high nonaudit fees have a negative impact on auditor independence when audit tenure is short and client firm size is small.
Corporate Governance Quality, Audit Fees and Non-Audit Services Fees
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2011
This paper extends prior research on the relationship between governance quality and auditor remuneration. We examine the influence of audit committee effectiveness (ACE), a proxy for governance quality, on audit fees (AF) and non-audit services fees (NASF) using a new composite measure comprising audit committee independence, expertise, diligence and size. We find that after controlling for board of director characteristics, there is a significant positive association between ACE and AF only for larger clients. Our results indicate that effective audit committees undertake more monitoring which results in wider audit scope and higher audit fees. Contrary to our expectations, we find the association between ACE and NASF to be positive and significant, especially for larger clients. This suggests that larger clients are more likely to purchase non-audit services (NAS) even in the presence of effective audit committees probably due to the complexity of their activities. Overall, our findings support regulatory initiatives aimed at improving corporate governance quality.
Auditor independence, executive pay and firm performance
Accounting and Finance, 2008
This paper investigates whether compensation committees actively intervene to adjust accounting performance-based incentive schemes for the real, or perceived, reduced earnings credibility signalled by the purchase of non-audit services. Using a nonlinear, two-stage least-squares method that accounts for the simultaneity of executive pay, firm performance and non-audit fees, we find a significant negative relationship between non-audit fees and the sensitivity of chief executive officer (CEO) pay to firm performance. Point estimates suggest that the reduced weight applied to accounting performance lowers the incentive component of executive pay between roughly 5 and 8 per cent for the CEO of the ‘average firm’.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
This study examines whether the provision of non-audit services by a firm's own auditors provides value to the firm. We examine the future return on assets and sales growth as a function of the expenditures by the client firms on non-audit services, reasoning that if such payments are intended primarily to impair auditor independence, no association with future firm performance should be detected. Our findings show that, in fact, the payments to auditors for non-audit services are positively related to the one-period ahead sales growth. We interpret these findings as suggesting that firms do obtain value for their expenditures on non-audit services provided by their auditors. Thus, even if auditor independence is compromised by such hiring, the value obtained by the client firms for their non-audit services may justify their hiring.
Corporate governance and auditor choice
2013
This paper analyzes the relationship between some internal corporate governance characteristics and external auditor choice. We use a sample of Italian listed companies during the period 2007 – 2010. The companies investigated operate in the industrial, merchandising, and service industries. External auditors are classified in two groups: Big 4 and non-Big 4 audit firms. Following previous research, we assume that audit services provided by the Big 4 are associated with higher audit quality. Corporate governance is observed through some features of the board of directors (BOD). Univariate and multivariate analysis show that BOD independence does not play a role in the choice of external auditor. The concentration of power stemming from the dual function of the CEO and Chairman of the Board is negatively associated with the choice of a Big 4 auditor. The BOD size appears to be positively associated with the choice of a reputed external auditor (Big 4). Overall, a small BOD and a conc...
The Impact of Corporate Governance on Auditor Choice
Social Science Research Network, 2011
In this research, the effect of corporate governance on choosing audit firms by companies accepted into the Tehran Stock Exchange has been investigated. The sample consisted of 545 observations (year-company) from 2004 to 2008. The audit firm size has been considered an audit quality criterion. The results of testing the research hypotheses by using a logistic regression model by means of the backward elimination method at the levels of all companies show that increasing the percentage of outside directors will increase the possibility of choosing high-quality audit firms. The percentage of institutional ownership (first hypothesis) has a negative meaningful relationship with the possibility of choosing high-quality audit firms as opposed to what was expected. Therefor only the fifth hypothesis of this research has been accepted regarding all companies. After the industry types were separately observed, the industry type was revealed that as a modifying factor it has an important effect on improving the statistics of the model and that it increases the potential of the power of prediction of the presented models.
Non-Audit Services and Auditor Independence in an Environment of Low Investor Protection
Revista Universo Contábil, 2016
This paper aims to evaluate whether the provision of non-audit services (NASs) affects external auditor independence in an environment characterised by low legal protection of minority investors and a high concentration of ownership and control. Audit reports and costs of services are analysed over 3 years for 154 Brazilian companies. The binary variable proxy for independence indicates a qualified auditor's report and, as an alternative specification, the issuing of a going concern opinion. Logit models were employed with control variables to identify aspects related to other sources of threats to independence, management influence, and the effort and risk of auditing services. The results indicate that the provision of NASs does not affect auditor independence. This evidence is robust in terms of the alternative specification of the independence proxy and the observation of a subset of companies considered qualifiable.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2008
Does auditor independence improve earnings quality and, if so, is regulation necessary to realize such improvements? Popular characterizations of recent governance scandals answer "yes!" but lack support from scholarly investigations. This disagreement motivates our investigation of whether auditor independence affects earnings quality in ways that prior research would have missed, and what any such effect means for the efficiency-consequences of related governance regulations. 1. We relax a priori data-restrictions that ignore the potential for auditors' dependence on consulting fees to enhance earnings quality. 2. We measure unexpected accounting fees in a more defensible manner, and develop a matching estimator to examine whether fee disclosures improve asset-pricing efficiency; and 3. We empirically evaluate the potential for governance externalities to rationalize proscriptive regulations. Our results offer some support for auditor independence improving earnings quality. Importantly, however, they also suggest that mandated fee disclosures exhausted any regulatory opportunities to improve this dimension of corporate governance, and thus speak more directly than does the literature against Sarbanes-Oxley's proscription on jointly producing audit and non-audit services.
Audit and non-audit fees and capital market perceptions of auditor independence
Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2009
This study provides evidence on whether auditor independence-in-appearance, proxied by earnings response coefficients, is related to the non-audit fee ratio (non-audit to total fees from a client) or client importance (total fees from a client as a percentage of the total revenues of the audit firm). The results from large samples over the period 2001–2006 show, contrary to popular belief