Evaluation of the South Yorkshire Social Infrastructure Programme - Report C: Programme Wide Assessment (original) (raw)
Related papers
Report-to date-of the Strategic Public Social Partnership (PSP) Model in Scotland
2018
Micaela Mazzei, Francesca Calo, Michael Roy and Simon Teasdale, Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University Research Findings Summary Background This Research Findings Summary presents the findings of the research commissioned by the Scottish Government Third Sector Unit to explore the progress, to date, of the Strategic Public Social Partnership (PSP) Model in Scotland “A strategic partnering arrangement which involves the Third Sector earlier and more deeply in the design and commissioning of public services.”
Foreword Liam Byrne, Minister for the Cabinet Office and Kevin Brennan, Minister for the Third Sector Government wants to strengthen the already powerful impact of third sector organisations in our economy. We are also leading a new drive to transform our public services. While many third sector organisations have a powerful story to tell, the social and environmental value of the impact being made is often underplayed. As we face tough economic times, it is now more important than ever that we allow for better recognition of those who create social and environmental value, leading to more efficient movement of resources to the right people, in the right place, at the right time. This new guide to Social Return on Investment is timely, as it will help third sector organisations to communicate better their impact to customers, government and the public, through measuring social and environmental value with confidence, in a standardised way that is easy for all to understand. The guid...
Social infrastructure partnerships: a firm rock in a storm?
Journal of Financial …, 2010
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to use the example of public housing renewal public-private partnerships (PPPs) to build knowledge on whether social infrastructure PPPs may appeal to the private sector as a less risky investment in a time of global financial uncertainty. Design/methodology/approach -The research is based on an international literature review and a limited number of semi-structured interviews with social housing PPP participants in England, the USA and Australia. These interviews were conducted by Dr Gilmour as part of his doctoral research in 2008. Findings -The familiar distinction between social and other forms of infrastructure PPPs has been found to be unhelpful in the case of public housing renewal. This type of PPPs, through their cross-subsidisation model, face relatively high revenue risk during a recession. However, the commitment of the public sector to the social goals of such projects suggests contract negotiation rather than default is likely if problems occur. PPP risks need to be understood by studying their detailed contract terms, rather than by broad categorisations. Research limitations/implications -This paper provides a grounded discussion rather than detailed research findings. Only a small number of projects are included and they are not necessarily representative. Cross-national comparison is challenging because of different housing policies and economic conditions. Originality/value -This paper fills a gap in the literature by both contrasting approaches to a particular type of social infrastructure PPP in different countries, and by making an early assessment of the likely impact of recent turbulence in financial and property markets.