A Lass and a Lack? Women in British Silent Comedy (original) (raw)
Related papers
“Have Women a Sense of Humor?”: Comedy and Femininity in Early Twentieth-Century Film
The Velvet Light Trap, 2011
n 1901 Harper's Bazaar asked the question, "Have Women a Sense of Humor?" (Coquelin 67). More than one hundred years later, Vanity Fair published an article explaining "Why Women Aren't Funny" (Hitchens 54). These articles are part of a larger debate about women's capacity to engage in and appreciate humor that has existed for many years and represent traces of a long-standing prejudice in American culture against women performing comedy, a prejudice that has a ected women's comic expression in every form and forum. Public debates about whether women have a sense of humor and the nature of women's humor date to at least the nineteenth century and clearly continue to this day. Countless writers and critics have argued that femininity and a sense of humor are mutually exclusive and that women's "natural" inclination toward emotion and sensitivity has left them incapable of possessing a quality-humor-that many feel is dependent on "masculine" traits such as intellect and aggressiveness. Women, the argument goes, are far too re ned and delicate to be funny. The True Woman, the feminine ideal for much of the late nineteenth century, was known for her morality, passivity, and spirituality, not for her ability to tell a joke. But just as women in the rst decades of the twentieth century challenged assumptions about femininity established with the True Woman, female comedians during this time challenged the notion that women were inherently unfunny.
Early Popular Visual Culture, 2019
Comedy as a gendered genre has, in recent decades, been in the forefront of both industry debates, with the emergence of comediennes on both sides of the Atlantic in television and film and female stand-up gaining wider exposure in the media and of academic discourse from Kathleen Rowe’s paradigm-shifting work on unruly women, to Linda Mizejewsky’s seminal volume on the perceived pretty/funny binary and to the recently published edited collection Hysterical, examining gendered aspects of the genre. Maggie Hennefeld’s comprehensive and in-depth study of female comedians in the silent film era not only complements these works but is an important intervention in the field of comedy studies as well as gender studies, as it interrogates the origins of film comedy and the role of women within this history and within film historiography itself.
Film & History Review: "Specters of Slapstick and Silent Film Comediennes" (by Rebecca Burditt)
FIlm & History: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2019
For feminist scholars, comedy has long been a fraught and polarizing topic. Citing theories of the comic that position laughter as a form of ridicule and social control, many have critiqued humor for its patriarchal oppression and violence toward women. At the same time, others have attempted to rescue comedy, arguing for its potential to upset social hierarchy and lampoon the status quo. This is why, as Maggie Hennefeld argues in Specters of Slapstick and Silent Film Comediennes, a large portion of female slapstick films from the 1890s-1910s has been left unexamined.
Historiographies of Women in Early Cinema
NECSUS Journal, 2019
In the recent decades, academic research on early cinema has grown remarkably. At the intersection of early cinema studies and feminist history, significant new research has revealed the hitherto overlooked presence of women, and the rich diversity of positions they held, in the first decades of film production. It is possible to see "Pink-Slipped: What Happened to Women in the Silent Film Industries?" and "Specters of Slapstick and Silent Film Comediennes" as products of a visionary investigative potential that currently characterises feminist film historiography of early cinema.
"Ta, te, ti, toe, too" The Horrors of the Harsh Female Voice in 1950s Hollywood Comedies
JAAAS: Journal of the Austrian Association for American Studies 1.2, 2020
Hollywood comedies of the 1950s saw the decline of a specific kind of female comedian, as unruly comediennes in the screwball tradition transformed into silly sexy vixens or tamed into homely sexless housewives. There are, however, some comedies which self-reflectively negotiate this shift. In this article, I would like to suggest that the voice of the comedienne serves as a marker of distinction. My article accordingly explores two pivotal examples of such transformative processes: Judy Holliday as Billie Dawn in Born Yesterday (1950) and Jean Hagen as Lina Lamont in Singin' in the Rain (1952). Both heroines feature what critics have called "the horrors of the harsh female voice." Whereas Billie's voice "survives" through schooling and refinement, Jean's voice resists all training and remains shrill and rowdy, leading to the violent expulsion of her character altogether. With the transformation and eventual disappearance of these extraordinary female actresses and their roles, such voices remained silent for a long time, until loud and brassy comediennes of a new generation were allowed to reappear on the silver screen and to raise their harsh and distinctive voices once again.
Acting: The Silent Screen (1895-1927)
Acting, 2015
In 1915 the American poet Vachel Lindsay claimed that European stage acting was unsuited to film. This critique held sway for decades, during which commentators celebrated American, as opposed to European, contributions to the new craft of motion picture acting. European acting became associated with mannered staginess in contrast to a more subtle American style. Building on recent scholarship that questions this dichotomy, Duckett skillfully analyzes the screen performances of two women actors: the French Sarah Bernhardt, arguably the most famous late nineteenth-century actor, who electrified theater audiences but made relatively few film appearances, and the American Lillian Gish, who began her career as a child in stage melodramas but whose fame derived from her appearances in films. Duckett’s nuanced reading of Bernhardt’s performance in the film Camille (Film D’Art, 1911) and Lillian Gish’s in Broken Blossoms (D. W. Griffith, 1919) reveals that despite their differences, they both used their bodies expressively to convey meanings and emotions.