Chapter 8 - Conclusions (original) (raw)
Related papers
a compact version for Part III
• This pile of lecture notes is mainly based on the research work done by Dr. Jussi Vesma and the lecturer during the last five years. • Later on, Djordje Babic and Prof. Markku Renfors have been provided contributions to this research.
Introduction to the subsequent three papers in the present volume
Linguistica, 1990
The subsequent three papers in the present volume (viz. Snedec', Teržan's, and Trobevšek-Drobnak's) have arisen from the research in historical syritax conducted since 1986 by us in the Department for Germanic Languages and Literatures of the University of Ljubljana, Yugoslavia, under the advisorship of J. Orešnik.
Conclusions and Recommended Readings
New Directions for Student Services, 1997
This chapter presents a synopsis of the major conclusions of this volume and a short annotated list of recommended readings for further investigation of the topic.
I. Introduction and Statement of Results
2013
In this paper we obtain some results on the zeros of polynomials and related analytic functions, which generalize and improve upon the earlier well-known results. Mathematics Subject Classification:
extent and source of information are derived from the existing literature and have been indicated through the dissertation at the appropriate places. The matter embodied in this work is original and has not been submitted for the award of any other degree or diploma, either in this or any other University.
2016
We hereby declare that this thesis is based on the results found by ourselves. Materials of work found by other researchers are mentioned by reference. This thesis, neither in whole nor in part, has been previously submitted for any degree.
A note on Propositions 7 and 8 of Goyal and Moraga (2001
2007
We will show that some results in , RAND Journal of Economics 32(4), are incomplete. The results are the social welfare and the total profit of the firms in the complete network is lower than those in some networks. They focus on the symmetric network gk where k is the number of links of each firm and show that the social welfare (the total profit of the firms) in the complete network gn-1 is lower than that in gn-2 where n is the number of the firms. However, their proofs are incomplete because there is no gn-2 if n is odd. Therefore, this paper gives the complete proof of their result. That is, since there is gn-3 if n is odd, we show the social welfare (total profit) in the gn-1 is lower than that in the network gn-3.