Lower eyelid excursion: A functional and cosmetically relevant parameter in the treatment of lower eyelid retraction (original) (raw)
Related papers
Subtle Eyelid Retraction after Lower Blepharoplasty
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2019
Background: Lower blepharoplasty is one of the commonest cosmetic surgeries performed in the United States. The delicate balance of the lower eyelid may be detrimentally altered in lower blepharoplasty, leading to lower eyelid retraction with the attendant functional and cosmetic consequences. Marginal reflex distance-2 (MRD2) is an insensitive measure for subtle lower eyelid retraction, and the MRD2 at the lateral limbus (MRD2 limbus) and tarsal marginal show (TMS) may be more sensitive in identifying eyelid retraction and eversion. Methods: A cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing lower blepharoplasty with skin pinch removal, laser resurfacing, or skin pinch removal with prophylactic lateral canthal resuspension. Mean follow-up was 22.1 weeks. Results: There was no significant difference in MRD2 after surgery after either laser resurfacing, skin pinch, or skin pinch with canthoplasty, either after surgery or between groups. MRD2 limbus was significantly increased after surgery in the skin pinch only group (p<0.05). There was a significant difference in postoperative MRD2 limbus in the skin pinch with canthoplasty group compared to the skin pinch only group (p<0.05). Tarsal marginal show was significantly increased after both laser resurfacing (p<0.001) and skin pinch only (p<0.05), and both postoperative groups demonstrated significantly increased tarsal marginal show compared to skin pinch with canthoplasty (p<0.05). Conclusions: MRD2 limbus and TMS more sensitive markers for lower eyelid retraction than MRD2. Subtle eyelid retraction and eversion occurs after anterior lamellar work, and can be prevented with prophylactic lateral canthal resuspension.
Lower Eyelid Retraction Surgery Without Internal Spacer Graft
Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2016
Background: Internal eyelid spacer graft is routinely placed during lower eyelid retraction surgery, which may be unnecessary. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of lower eyelid retraction surgery without internal graft in select cases. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing reconstructive lower eyelid retraction surgery without internal graft, by one surgeon from 2013 to 2015. Surgical technique included transconjunctival lower eyelid retractor lysis, canthoplasty, and temporary tarsorrhaphy, with or without subperiosteal midface-sub oribularis oculi fat (SOOF) lifting and scar lysis. Eyelids with true lower eyelid middle-lamella shortage were excluded. Analysis included 17 surgeries (11 patients). Eight of 11 patients had undergone at least one previous lower eyelid surgery with resultant lower eyelid retraction and sclera show. Preoperative and postoperative photographs at longest follow-up visit were analyzed with standardized measurements. Patient satisfaction was recorded using questionnaire. Results: Etiologies of lower eyelid retraction included prior lower blepharoplasty, thyroid eye disease, and chronic facial palsy. All 11 patients (17 procedures) demonstrated improvement of lower eyelid position. The mean improvement of marginal reflex distance was 2.2 mm (range, 1.6-2.8 mm). There was one case of mild overcorrection. The average follow-up was 7 months (range, 6 months-2 years). Midface lift was performed for 14 of 17 eyelids. Conclusions: This study demonstrates improvement of lower lid position after lower eyelid retraction surgery without internal eyelid spacer graft in select patients. Most patients in our study had undergone previous lower eyelid blepharoplasty and required midface-SOOF lifting. The author proposes that "routine" placement of lower eyelid internal spacer/graft may not be necessary during lower eyelid retraction surgery.
The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery, 2008
Purpose: To define a subgroup of postblepharoplasty patients with persistent lower eyelid retraction despite attempted lower eyelid reconstruction and midface-lifting, and to propose a revisional midface-lifting procedure to address complex cicatricial patterns in these patients. Methods: This is a retrospective observational case series of consecutive patients with bilateral persistent cicatricial lagophthalmos from lower blepharoplasty despite prior lower eyelid reconstruction and midface-lifting. An approach for midface-lifting and lower eyelid reconstruction was designed that consisted of transconjunctival, sublabial, and temporal approaches to the subperiosteal space with manual distraction cicatricial scar matrix lysis. Routine postoperative evaluation of clinical outcome, safety, patient satisfaction, and photographic analysis was performed. Results: A total of 8 patients who underwent revisional midface-lift surgery (15 ipsilateral surgeries) were identified. In all 15 cases, a 3-dimensional cicatricial matrix was identified that involved the lower eyelid and midface and limited visual exposure of the subperiosteal space and mobility of the midface despite complete subperiosteal release to the sublabial incision. Manual anterior distraction of the midface via the sublabial incision provided a mechanism for lysis of the cicatricial matrix. Improved midface mobility allowed successful vertical fixation with maximal anterior lamellar recruitment and lower eyelid support. No complications were encountered. All patients reported improvement in cosmesis and ocular comfort. Average improvements in lower margin to reflex distance (MRD2) was 0.9 mm, scleral show was 0.8 mm, palpebral fissure
Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2017
To compare 3 upper eyelid retraction repair techniques and introduce novel metrics, which enhance the analysis of postoperative aesthetic outcomes. Retrospective review with Image J 1.48 digital analysis of patients who underwent repair of thyroid-related upper eyelid retraction at the University of Iowa from 1996 to 2014 via 1 of 3 surgical techniques, septum-opening levator recession with Muellerectomy, modified septum-preserving levator recession with Muellerectomy, and modified septum-preserving full-thickness blepharotomy, was conducted. Photographs were obtained preoperatively, 3 to 6 months postoperatively, and at last follow up (>6 months) and evaluated by digital image analysis (denoted by "i"). Outcome measures assessed were marginal reflex distance (iMRD1), temporal-to-nasal ratio, tarsal platform show (iTPS), pupil to visible eyelid crease, brow fat span (iBFS), tarsal platform show to brow fat span ratio (iTPS:iBFS), and tarsal platform show minimizing powe...
Vertical Midface Lifting with Periorbital Anchoring in the Management of Lower Eyelid Retraction
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2017
Background: Lower eyelid retraction can be the unfortunate result of aesthetic surgery, trauma, disease, or the aging processes. The purpose of this article is to assess whether midface lifting based on purely vertical repositioning constitutes an effective procedure for its correction. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on 199 patients (311 eyelids) operated on between January of 2004 and January of 2014. The various causes of eyelid retraction in this population included cosmetic blepharoplasty (56.8 percent), involutional ectropion (23.1 percent), tumor resection (9.5 percent), facial nerve paralysis (8.5 percent), and trauma and related surgery (2 percent). The study was restricted exclusively to cases of moderate and severe lower eyelid retraction addressed by means of midface lifting. The mean follow-up time was 16.8 months. All of the patients were subjected to midface lifting with strengthening of the lateral canthus. A spacer graft was also used in 37.7 percent of the cases. Results: One hundred ninety-five patients (97.9 percent) displayed objective improvement of the eyelid retraction and a marked degree of improvement both in aesthetic terms and as regards the functional disorders reported. Only four patients (2 percent) presented complications such as needing another operation. Conclusion: Midface lifting based on purely vertical repositioning makes it possible to recruit a considerable amount of "new" skin at the lower eyelid, thus ensuring a decrease in vertical distraction and correct recovery of the height of the external lamellar plane.
Aesthetic Considerations in Upper Eyelid Retraction Surgery
Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 2012
Purpose: Classically, the aesthetic outcomes of eyelid retraction surgery in patients with thyroid-associated orbitopathy have been described in reference to eyelid margin position and marginal reflex distance. A critically important component of upper eyelid contour is the tarsal platform show (TPS). With this study, the authors aimed to assess the hypothesis that modification of the tarsal platform in posterior eyelid retraction surgery has a significant effect on the final aesthetic outcome. Methods: In a retrospective, observational, case-cohort study, the authors reviewed the medical records of 36 patients with thyroid-associated orbitopathy who underwent primary eyelid retraction surgery by 1 surgeon. Patients who underwent eyelid retraction surgery at the time of orbital decompression were excluded. The surgical technique consisted of posterior approach conjunctival release of Müeller muscle and graded recession of the levator aponeurosis. To address lateral flare, dissection was carried toward the lateral orbital rim with spreading of the lateral horn of the levator aponeurosis. Outcome measures were millimeters of TPS, millimeters of brow fat span, and symmetry of the eyelid margin position. Randomized preoperative and postoperative standardized photographs were evaluated in masked fashion by 4 surgeons to grade cosmetic outcomes. Results: Fifteen patients (24 eyelids) met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up period was 6 months (range, 3-12). Mean TPS increased from 2.27 mm (standard deviation, 1.9 mm) to 4.77 mm (standard deviation, 1.7 mm; p < 0.05). Mean brow fat span remained unchanged, from 13.22 mm (standard deviation, 2.2 mm) to 13.25 mm (standard deviation, 1.9; p > 0.05). Evaluation of the aesthetic outcomes (eyelid contour, eyelid symmetry, and TPS) by 4 masked observers characterized the relevance of TPS in the postoperative aesthetics of eyelid contour and symmetry. Conclusions: In upper eyelid retraction surgery, the ability to control the TPS has a significant impact on the final aesthetic outcome. Posterior approach eyelid retraction surgery can control eyelid contour and can represent an ideal surgical approach in carefully selected patients. However, it has limited ability to control upper orbital volume and eyebrow and orbital fat (brow fat span). This can result in relative overelongation of the TPS. Factors such as ethnic characteristics, bony asymmetry, brow fat span, and premorbid TPS influence cosmetic outcomes achieved by the anterior or posterior approach. For optimal aesthetic results in eyelid retraction surgery, the decision for anterior versus posterior approach should be individualized.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 2017
Background: Lower eyelid retraction can be the unfortunate result of aesthetic surgery, trauma, disease, or the aging processes. The purpose of this article is to assess whether midface lifting based on purely vertical repositioning constitutes an effective procedure for its correction. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on 199 patients (311 eyelids) operated on between January of 2004 and January of 2014. The various causes of eyelid retraction in this population included cosmetic blepharoplasty (56.8 percent), involutional ectropion (23.1 percent), tumor resection (9.5 percent), facial nerve paralysis (8.5 percent), and trauma and related surgery (2 percent). The study was restricted exclusively to cases of moderate and severe lower eyelid retraction addressed by means of midface lifting. The mean follow-up time was 16.8 months. All of the patients were subjected to midface lifting with strengthening of the lateral canthus. A spacer graft was also used in 37.7 percent ...
Acta Ophthalmologica, 2016
To evaluate the histological appearances of the epithelial cells and the clinical effect of the hard palate mucous membrane (HPM) graft for the treatment of lower eyelid retraction (LER). Methods: This was a follow-up study involving 15 patients, with a total of 16 eyes operated. Five patients had LER as a result of Graves' ophthalmopathy and/or inferior rectus recession, six patients because of wearing an eye prosthesis, two patients because of previous tumour excision, one patient because of proptosis due to sphenoid wing meningioma and one patient because of previous lower eyelid blepharoplasty. Three imprint biopsies were taken from each patient, one from the tarsal conjunctiva in the healthy eye, one from the graft in the operated eye and one from unoperated hard palate. The inferior scleral show was measured on pre-and postoperative photographs and related to the horizontal corneal diameter. Results: Median follow-up time was 21.2 [range 4.5-87.9] months. Imprints from the graft and the hard palate showed equally large epithelial cells; imprints from conjunctiva showed small epithelial cells. The mean (AESD) scleral show was 0.12 AE 0.09 cornea diameter before surgery and 0.0003 AE 0.08 cornea diameter at invited follow-up (p < 0.001, paired t-test). Corrected for direction of gaze, the mean improvement in scleral show was 0.12 AE 0.08 cornea diameter. Thirteen of 14 patients were satisfied with the final result. Conclusion: A HPM graft for LER maintains its native epithelial morphology and gives a lasting improvement in most patients.