English Language Learners and the No Child Left Behind Act (original) (raw)
No Child Left Behind: Realizing the Vision. Policy Brief
Kirsten Miller
2003
View PDFchevron_right
Promises and Pitfalls: Implications of No Child Left Behind for Defining, Assessing, and Serving English Language Learners
Catherine Snow
Civil Rights Project …, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Policy Brief: North Carolina GCS-C-021 is Setting English Language Learners ELL Up for failure
Sahar Moursi
View PDFchevron_right
No Child Left Behind: Implications for Special Education Students and Students with Limited English Proficiency
Mark Jewell
Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
The No Child Left Behind Act and English Language Learners: Assessment and Accountability Issues
J. Abedi
Educational Researcher, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
Evolution of Federal Policy and Implications of No Child Left Behind for Language Minority Students. Executive Summary
Wayne Wright
Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
No Child Left Behind and Its Effects on Language Policy
Kate Menken
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
ECS Report to the Nation: State Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act
WILLIAM WANKER
Education Commission of the States, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
Evolution of Federal Policy and Implications of No Child Left Behind for Language Minority Students. Policy Brief
Wayne Wright
Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
No child left behind: repealing and Unpeeling federal language education policy in the united states
Nancy Hornberger
Language Policy, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
The Unintended Consequences of Colorado's Anti-Bilingual Initiative
Kathy M Escamilla
2002
View PDFchevron_right
Translating "No Child Left Behind" for English Language Learners and TESOL Professionals
Diane Rodriguez
2003
View PDFchevron_right
Where Do English Language Learner Students Go to School? Student Distribution by Language Proficiency in Arizona. REL Technical Brief. REL 2010-No.015
Eric Haas
Regional Educational Laboratory West, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Teaching to the Test: How No Child Left Behind Impacts Language Policy, Curriculum, and Instruction for English Language Learners
Kate Menken
Bilingual Research Journal, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
No Child Left Behind: What It Means for U.S. Adolescents and What We Can Do About It
Kathleen Hinchman
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
A Statewide Investigation into Meeting the Mandates of No Child Left Behind
Patricia Smeaton
Center For Rural Pennsylvania, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
The No Child Left Behind Act: An analysis of the continuing effects of NCLB and recent changes in federal education policy
Moriah Horner
View PDFchevron_right
Introduction: Some Legacies of No Child Left behind
April Bedford
2010
View PDFchevron_right
Implementing no child left behind in three states
Brian Stecher
PsycEXTRA Dataset, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
GMc Aboy EDU7001-8Signature Assignment No Child Left Behind
Gregory McAboy MEd
View PDFchevron_right
The No Child Left Behind Act
James Kauffman
Intervention in School and Clinic, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
A Four-Year Study of ACT Reading Results: Achievement Trends among Eleventh-Grade Boys and Girls in a Midwestern State
Dr. Dea Conrad-Curry
Journal of Education, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Beaulieu, D. and L. Sparks (2005). No Child Left Behind in Indian Country; Preliminary Report of Findings of Hearings, National Indian Education Association Center for Indian Education.
David Beaulieu
View PDFchevron_right
No Child Left Behind Act. Research Brief
Mike Muir
Education Partnerships Inc, 2003
View PDFchevron_right
The Impact of the Adequate Yearly Progress Requirement of the Federal" No Child Left Behind" Act on Schools In the Great Lakes Region
David Garcia
2005
View PDFchevron_right
Exacerbating inequality: the failed promise of the No Child Left Behind Act
David Hursh
Race Ethnicity and Education, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Limited English Proficient Students: Increased Accountability Under NCLB. Policy Brief
Gail Sunderman
Civil Rights Project at Harvard University, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
State Implementation of NCLB Policies and Interpretation of the NAEP Performance of English Language Learners
Richard P Duran
PsycEXTRA Dataset, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
Position Paper on Assessment and Accountability of English Language Learners Under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-110
Michael Cat
View PDFchevron_right
Wright, W. E. (2005). Heritage language programs in the era of English-only and No Child Left Behind. Heritage Language Journal, 5(1), 1-25
Wayne Wright
Heritage Language Journal, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
English learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy
Kate Menken
2008
View PDFchevron_right
The Achievement Progress of English Learner Students in Nevada. REL 2016-154
Eric Haas
2016
View PDFchevron_right
State Policies for Standardized Achievement Testing of Limited English Proficient Students
Wayne Gordon
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
Test-based accountability systems: Concerns for Indiana’s multilingual learners and their teachers
Katie Brooks
View PDFchevron_right
Linking geography to reading and English language learners' achievement in US elementary and middle school classrooms
Elizabeth R. Hinde
View PDFchevron_right