Peer Evaluation in CMC Learning Environment and Writing Skill (original) (raw)
Related papers
Implementing Peer Assessment Tools to Enhance Teaching Writing
Collaborative work has become increasingly important; however, many teachers do not include it in teaching writing since they regard writing as an individual act. The aim of this paper is to show a new approach in teaching academic writing. It is based on the sociocultural theory, constructivism and the developed process writing model. The idea is that students go through the process of collaboration by using peer assessment activities (through workshops on Moodle). This approach is very demanding and time-consuming in a traditional classroom setting, but it is not the case in an eLearning environment. There are many advantages why teachers should use online peer assessment tools and one of the possible modes of such instruction is presented in this paper.
Cooperative Learning Methods and the Teaching of English Writing: Peer Response
The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the use of one cooperative learning method, peer response, in second language (L2) writing classrooms in traditional (e.g. pen-and-paper and face-to-face) modes versus computerbased (e.g., synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication) modes. The article addresses the question of what benefits computer-mediated communication (CMC) modes can offer over traditional modes for L2 peer response in terms of students' attitudes about the modes of peer response, quantity of student participation, students' interaction and discussion of comments, and the revision of papers. Current research on both asynchronous and synchronous CMC for peer response is discussed. The article then provides a synthesis of the findings and concludes by providing implications of the research for pedagogy and practical suggestions for implementing the use of CMC in L2 peer response.
The effects of computer-supported collaborative learning on students' writing performance
Using mixed research methods, this study investigated the effect of a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment in improving the fifth graders' writing performance and outcomes. Thirty-four students participated in a real-world writing project, taking on alternative roles of journalists and editors in creating a school newspaper. While both groups were engaged in the task of collaborative writing, the CSCL group was supported by a web-based software Knowledge Forum whereas the control group created their articles via paper and pencil. During the research, observation notes were taken and students were interviewed. The results showed that students who worked with Knowledge Forum had significant gains in their writing performance compared with the control group. In addition, the students in Knowledge Forum were more motivated to write than the other group. The study demonstrates that CSCL augments collaborative learning and makes individuals' thinking visible via its technological affordances.
International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 2021
The present case study aims to compare collaborative writing activities produced on the Padlet website on the internet and in a face-to-face (F2F) environment. This study for which criterion sampling was used included two different groups, both of which were formed with four people. For the triangulation of the case study, texts produced F2F and online, video recordings of the F2F writing process and records of the group interviews conducted after the internet practice. Thus, comparative evaluation regarding various components, such as writing processes, writing achievement, group interaction, creativity, and opinions of participants was performed depending on different data types. the findings suggest that the online environment shone out with advantages, such as time, flexibility, supporting creativity through and multimedia tools, whereas F2F writing offered advantages in communication and simultaneous changes by group members. However, it was detected that online texts were more successful than F2F texts and students' achievement perceptions were higher in their Padlet texts.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2017
Collaborative writing has gained interest in the last decade; however, as stated by Shin, Lidster and Sabraw (2016) more research is required to delve into various aspects of this multifarious class activity. This true experimental research examined the effect of writing collaboratively on task achievement of Iranian EFL learners in writing. Oxford Placement Test was given to 60 language learners in the city of Kashmar, Iran, as the test of homogeneity. Considering +/-1 standard deviation of the mean score, 40 learners were chosen to pursue the purpose of the study. These learners formed an experimental group and a control group with 20 participants in each. Collaborative writing was implemented in the experimental group and individual writing was used in the comparison group. The participants in the experimental group were later interviewed and their perception toward collaborative writing was investigated. The findings of the study through t-test revealed that the experimental gr...
Designing online peer assessment activities to improve students' writing skills
Siliwangi International English Conference , 2014
This paper highlights the use of Facebook group as a teaching medium for online peer assessment activities to improve students’ writing skills. Thirty students of Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau majoring in English education who I taught in an academic writing course participated in this study. The study was carried out in the design of classroom action research. This study strongly suggests that students can benefit from the online peer assessment activities and positive attitudes toward the feedback and integration of flexible and blended learning into the peer assessment activities are all key factors in the development of their writing skills.
2015
This classroom study investigated how computer-based writing tools and collaborative writing tasks mediated the development of individual writing competencies among 35 graduate students during a 4-week course in Taiwan focused on English tests like the TOEFL. I prepared a unique platform of writing tools for the course and then quantified the types of writing knowledge generated from students' collaborative writing (CW) and uses of these mediation tools, then associated these with the students’ CW performance and then individual writing performance on 3 drafts of 4 TOEFL writing tasks over the duration of the course. Data included collaborative writers’ dialogues and online browsing histories and all compositions produced during the course. Supplementary data were questionnaires and interviews on students’ perceived changes in communications, reflections on CW, and self-assessed beliefs about their writing abilities. A comparison class of 26 students, which I also taught a year ...
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016
Writing as a process has been recognized as an important tenant to integrate in L1 and L2 language courses. Research in this area has shown that collaboration in the form of peer-review exercises can improve writing outcomes. Even though research in this area has identified benefits for conducting peer reviews online, these studies have focused on the analysis of improvements in writing skills from the collaboration process without full consideration of the medium used in the process of collaboration and how the perceptions of students evolve. This mixed-methods longitudinal study was aimed at the examination of the change in perceptions of Spanish intermediate language learners in out-of-class writing tasks. The study considered the interactions of 201 students in peer review exercises using discussion forums and grading rubrics in Blackboard 9. Data was collected using a survey that contained 17 Likert-scale items and two open-ended questions. The survey was administered at the beginning, middle, and end of 16-week semesters for a year. Results of the study have pedagogical implications for the selection of the medium of interaction and the use of digital media in collaborative writing assignments for instructors as well as course and materials developers.
2015
This study explored the effects of collaborative Computer-mediated Communication (CMC) on acquiring voice and improving writing quality in English as a second language (L2) writing. This thesis is conceptually grounded in applications of socio-cultural theory to language learning (Vygotsky 1978, 1981). Data were collected from 35 L2 students studying English for Academic Purposes as part of a bridging program in an Ontario university. The data included writing samples over three iterations during 13 weeks of both face-to-face collaborative writing and collaborative CMC, interviews with a subsample of students, and a Technology Satisfaction Questionnaire. The focus of analysis was on changes in the quality of voice in the students’ English writing over time. There was a change in voice intensity in their writing over the course of the study; the use of the collaborative CMC was related to this change. Implications are recommended for teachers, students, and further research.