(2022) Zoom in and zoom out the glocalized network (original) (raw)
Related papers
Covid‐19 and Global Networks: Reframing our understanding of globalization and transnationalism
Global Networks
It is now over 3 years since the global Covid-19 pandemic cast its long shadow over the human face of globalization and transnationalism, fundamentally changing the practices of transnational actors and their constituent networks in both global and local affairs. Those global networks between individuals, family-members, firms, social groups, and organizations have been disrupted and reframed to produce new forms of capital flows, labour mobilities, communication technologies, and social-economic-political and cultural relationships. Such disruptions have transcended territorial borders presenting significant challenges to states, firms, cities, and governance. Covid-19 has fundamentally redrawn our understanding of research focused on (a) transnational social sciences perspectives; (b) networks, flows, connections, and disconnections; (c) human agency and 'globalization from below'; and (d) the future of globalization and transnationalism. The pandemic and ensuing post-pandemic disruption for global society have raised more questions than answers for individuals, communities, governance, states, and organizations. Global inequality has been magnified, populism remains a powerful force, and there is a growing debate whether we are drifting into a new epoch manifested by deglobalization, with heightened friction over the international trade of goods and services, global migration flows, and a new spirit of the protectionism of borders, which has been ramped-up over the past decade with Trumpism and, in Europe, Brexit. But, simultaneously, the fallout of Covid-19 has speeded up, intensified, and in some senses democratized communication and connections, through the advent (or just discovery) of platforms like MS Teams, Zoom, Bluejeans which have not only become normalized technologies for individuals to work from home or engage in their
Complexities of networked media within the transitive spheres of globalization
new media & society, 2010
The daily spectacle of the ubiquitously co-mingled presence of social media, quotidian violence and political oppression in the wake of the Iranian presidential elections of June 2009 reminds us of the need to develop a greater understanding of the forces at play. As resistance to the results of the Iranian presidential election mounted, stories abounded concerning the key role played by bloggers, hacks, Twitter and other networked media events in the mobilization of attention, or what the Washington Times called 'Iran's Twitter ...
The Nature of Organization in Transnational Networks
www.laetusinpraesens.org, 1972
Range of types of transnational organization Inter-organizational linkages Inter-organizational network roles Conclusions and policy implications Annex 1: List of organizations questioned Annex 2: Some functions performed prior to the establishment of an inter-organizational relationship Annex 3: Some network roles Annex 4: Network action strategy in a transnational setting
The Spaces and Times of Globalization: Place, Scale, Networks, and Positionality*
Economic Geography, 2009
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
2020
The COVID-19 pandemic, besides triggering the most severe economic crisis since the Great Depression, is accelerating technological trends that were well in the making before its outbreak. The Great Lockdown exposed the digital divide between frontier and non-frontier firms, with the former group being able to provide services and goods no longer available within traditional markets. The growing concentration of power and wealth in the hands of a few global digital companies will shape global and domestic politics in the immediate future. Globally, the pandemic has increased geopolitical rivalry and underlined the decline of the US as a superpower. At the same time, it has highlighted the fact that geopolitical confrontation is increasingly taking place in the digital domain and among private companies. The information space has been overloaded by an 'infodemic' and cyberattacks directed at hospitals, research institutes and universities have soared in the race to discover a...
The role of Cultural Transnational Networks in the digital transformation during COVID19 emergency
The emergence of European Transnational Networks (TNs) in different policy sectors since the late 90s’, including culture, depicts a paradigmatic shift in the governance landscape more inclined to tackle complex global issues and wicked problems. In the increased network feature of European governance, transnational networks are one variant of the governing process (Kern and Bulkelet 2009) and part of the wider Europeanization process. The literature outlines the benefits and challenges of this phenomena: on the one hand enhancing participation in policy-making and implementation processes - involving new actors such as civil society, universities, cultural organizations and professionals, - on the other, thought, the risk of endangering democratic legitimation by reinforcing closed elite cycle in the decision processes (Bulkeley et al. 2003; Khan 2013). Furthermore, the fuzziness in the network’ function is delineated. The scarce literature on the topic shows vagueness in defining Transnational Networks in the cultural sector, their structure and activities, and informs that a valid conceptual framework to address how networks operate is still lacking. This paper strives to tackle such a literature gap, proposing an updated definition of Cultural Transnational Networks and questioning their operation in the digital era. Specifically, we enquire about what role did transnational networks cover during the COVID-19 pandemic and we interrogate whether networks are contributing to implementing digitalization as an EU Cultural policy priority. Presentation: https://encatccongress.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2021-ERS-Part-III-Session-8\_Abstracts-1.pdf
(2022) Why Zoom Is Not Doomed Yet: Privacy and Security Crisis Response in the COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic brought Zoom explosive growth and a major privacy and security crisis in March 2020. This research advances a producer's perspective that directs attentions to institutional and organizational actors and draws on theories of privacy management and organizational crisis communication to examine Zoom's response to its privacy and security crisis. We primarily use data from 14 weekly Ask Eric Anything webinars from April 8 to July 15, 2020 to illustrate the strategies of Zoom's crisis response, especially organizational representation, the contours of its analytic account acknowledging and reducing responsibility, and patterns of corrective and preventive action for user education and product improvement. Results demonstrate the usefulness of the producer's perspective and shed light on how Zoom navigated the privacy and security crisis through mobilizing networks of executives, advisors, consultants, and clients for expertise, endorsement, and collaboration. Moreover, its response strategies have built on and contributed to Zoom's organizational mission and culture, reframing the crisis as a growth opportunity for prioritizing privacy and security rather than mere growing pains. Zoom's nimble, reasonable, collaborative, interactive and curated organizational response to its privacy and security crisis as an unintended consequence of its sudden rise to prominence amid a global pandemic offers a useful model for tech firms' crisis response at a crucial moment for the tech industry around the world. Implications are relevant to understanding the sociotechnical and economic consequences of this ongoing global pandemic.
Transversal Politics of Big Tech
International Political Sociology
Our everyday life is entangled with products and services of so-called Big Tech companies, such as Amazon, Google, and Facebook. International relations (IR) scholars increasingly seek to reflect on the relationships between Big Tech, capitalism, and institutionalized politics, and they engage with the practices of algorithmic governance and platformization that shape and are shaped by Big Tech. This collective discussion advances these emerging debates by approaching Big Tech transversally, meaning that we problematize Big Tech as an object of study and raise a range of fundamental questions about its politics. The contributions demonstrate how a transversal perspective that cuts across sociomaterial, institutional, and disciplinary boundaries and framings opens up the study of the politics of Big Tech. The discussion brings to the fore perspectives on the ontologies of Big Tech, the politics of the aesthetics and credibility of Big Tech and rethinks the concepts of legitimacy and ...
Networked liabilities: Transnational authority in a world of transnational business
European Journal of International Relations, 2016
The proliferation of production networks and cross-border contracting is frequently cited as empowering globally active corporations to skirt, and shape, national regulations. While scholars often focus on the political gains from these new forms of business organization, we shift the conversation to the potential political costs of global firm reorganization. The spread of corporate subsidiaries and global supply-chain networks leave firms vulnerable to a host of jurisdictional claims, and by targeting a domestically rooted affiliate, states can bring the global practices of the multinational corporation in line with their interests. In other words, states can take advantage of the transnationalization of the firm to transnationalize their authority beyond traditional jurisdictional boundaries. We label this process “networked liabilities.” Specifically, the combination of a firm’s sunk costs and the country’s jurisdictional substitutability determines the ability of governments to...