We Refuse to Cope! The Vitruvian Nurse, the Code of Conduct, and Nurses’ Lived Knowledge (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Vitruvian nurse and burnout: New materialist approaches to impossible ideals
2022
The Vitruvian Man is a metaphor for the "ideal man" by feminist posthuman philosopher Rosi Braidotti (2013) as a proxy for eurocentric humanist ideals. The first half of this paper extends Braidotti's concept by thinking about the metaphor of the "ideal nurse" (Vitruvian nurse) and how this metaphor contributes to racism, oppression, and burnout in nursing and might restrict the professionalization of nursing. The Vitruvian nurse is an idealized and perfected form of a nurse with selfsacrificial language (re)producing self-sacrificing expectations. The second half of this paper looks at how regulatory frameworks (using the example of UK's Nursing and Midwifery Council Code of Conduct) institutionalize the conditions of possibility through collective imaginations. The domineering expectations found within the Vitruvian nurse metaphor and further codified by regulatory frameworks give rise to boredom and burnout. The paper ends by suggesting possible ways to diffract regulatory frameworks to practice with affirmative ethics and reduce feelings of selfsacrifice and exhaustion among nurses.
Interpreting Posthumanism with Nurse Work
2019
We argue that nurse work can illustrate posthuman theory, and we suggest that posthuman theory may have applications for the development of nurse work and care. We aim to contribute to philosophical conversations by making nurse work an accessible way to talk about posthumanism. First, we mobilise the humanistic perspective underlying nurse work. We draw attention to tensions in nurse work that are linked with humanistic thinking to make a case for the reconfiguration of nurse work with posthumanism. Next, we suggest how posthumanism may add to the understanding of nurse work. We do so in a first step by distinguishing posthumanism from transhumanism. In a second step, laying out three key features of posthumanism: all matter is one, monism and sympoiesis. We explore practical examples of nurse work with posthumanism to show theory in action and ways in which posthumanism can deterritorialise nurse work from humanism. Third, we look at what implications posthuman philosophy could have in nursing. In framing nursing and care practices in ways that do not necessarily have the human at the centre, we begin to create new possibilities for understanding nurse work.
In this paper, I discuss nurses' ongoing difficulty in engaging with politics and address the persistent belief that political positioning is antithetical to quality nursing care. I suggest that nurses are not faced with choosing either caring for their patients or engaging with politics. I base my discussion on the assumption that such dichotomy is meaningless and that engaging with issues of relationships firmly grounds nursing in the realm of politics. I argue that the ethical merit of nursing care relies instead on positioning nurses squarely at the centre of care activities, experiences, and functions. Such positioning makes possible what Foucault called 'practices of self-formation', that is, micro-level processes that balance out the ubiquitous economic, cultural, legal, and scientific technologies that steadily constitute subjects in this era of modernity. Nurses, then, become not a group that needs to be controlled and governed, but individuals who must care for their self before they may care for anyone else.
A case for the ‘middle ground’: exploring the tensions of postmodern thought in nursing
Nursing Philosophy, 2001
Diverse beliefs about the nature and essence of scientific truth are pervasive in the nursing literature. Most recently, rejection of a more traditional and objective truth has resulted in a shift toward an emphasis on the acceptance of multiple and subjective truths. Some nursing scholars have discarded the idea that objective truth exists at all, but instead have argued that subjective truth is the only knowable truth and therefore the one that ought to govern nursing's disciplinary inquiry. Yet, there has been relatively little critical debate or dialogue about the implications of adopting subjective and multiple truths as a maxim to govern the discipline. In this paper we examine what it might mean to adopt subjective forms of truth as the only knowable truths for nursing, and to accept the possibility of multiple co-existing realities. We understand the implications of such a philosophical stance for the epistemological basis of a practice science to be considerable, therefore we consider what it might mean for a practice-based discipline such as nursing to remain ambiguous on the question of truth, and examine the implications of failing to achieve consensus on what constitutes a truth claim. On the basis of this examination, we urge a cautious approach to the extremes of either position and argue for a more thoughtful and rigorous dialogue about 'truth' and knowledge in nursing practice, education, and research.
The last post? Defending nursing against the postmodernist maze
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 1996
Is postmodernism in many ways the empiricist-liberal tradition at the inevitable end of its intellectual and political tether? Or is postmodernism the ‘laughter of genius’ that art and argument in their traditional forms are dead? Can postmodernism be applied to social and economic issues whilst carrying a denial of the manner by which Western thought has shaped these issues? Can postmodernism provide moral pathways to help us with contemporary ethical issues? How can postmodernist thought encompass the activities of nurses, particularly in the area of psychiatric care? Can nurses afford postmodernist suppositions in the face of suffering and pain? If postmodernism exists, does it exist everywhere (as does nursing) or is it a more localized event?
Constructing a ‘plausible narrative of progress’ for nursing: a neopragmatist suggestion
Nursing Philosophy, 2009
Identity, difference, and the associated subject of cultural diversity pose challenges for nursing. As the demographics of the world change, demands are rising for nurses to provide sensitive, individualized care to people living in our ever-changing global community. Issues concerning gender, sexuality, disability, age, language, economic and occupational status, multiculturalism, and ethnicity are made more complex because many of these topics strike a personal chord for individual nurses. In order for nursing to provide appropriate care to the world's people and to meet future challenges, nursing must define itself in new ways. Kikuchi and Simmons have stated that the best way for nursing to approach this task is through the development of a ‘sound’ philosophy of nursing that will ‘accommodate diversity in nursing thought’. They contend that before we can establish a philosophy of nursing, nurses will have to agree upon the nature of reality, human beings, truth, and knowledge. This paper will suggest that neopragmatism, as described by Richard Rorty, is a way to assure diversity of thought in nursing. However, I will argue against the requirement for this philosophy to be ‘sound’ in the sense that Kikuchi and Simmons use this term. In place of their call for ‘truth and unity in nursing thought’. I will attempt to demonstrate how neopragmatic ideas relate to the construction of what Rorty called a unifying ‘plausible narrative of progress’. This change will allow nursing to abandon the dead end debate over epistemologies and instead focus on more important issues related to improving nursing practice.
Cruel Britannia: a personal critique of nursing in the United Kingdom
Contemporary nurse
The UK once led the world in nursing but because of the exigencies of the funding mechanisms of the NHS, it has fallen a long way behind other countries. We aim to raise awareness inside and outside the UK about the decline in nursing as a profession there. We are purposely contentious, in an attempt to raise questions, both for the UK and for countries which are recruiting British nurses who are leaving because of job losses caused by the funding crisis in the National Health Service (NHS). This paper discusses where the problems that have led to the decline have come from, where nursing is going and poses questions for the future. We hope that the UK government and those who influence the development of nursing will bring it back to the standard it once had.
2019
This thesis examines the occupational discourse(s) of a group of nurses working on a single medical unit in a Scottish NHS hospital, in light of debates concerning the contemporary function and focus of nursing. There are a number of (seemingly conflictual) impulses concerning how the work of nurses might be conceptualized and the study here aims to demonstrate how nurses’ discursive practices seek to negotiate these varying demands and expectations. Principally, the research comments on the relationship between ‘care’ and ‘profession’ which, as the thesis establishes, are mutable concepts whose discursive elaboration can be variously realized. Recent efforts to establish nursing as an independent profession have identified ‘care’ as the theoretical basis of professional knowledge, with the recent move to degree-level study seemingly providing the academic credentials to support this. Some have argued however that a professional, academic outlook is antithetical to authentic caring,...