Interdisciplinarity and institutional context: a commentary on the REF (original) (raw)
Related papers
Rethinking interdisciplinarity in social sciences: Is it a new revolution or paradox
Present paper interrogates and discusses the place of interdisciplinary inquiry in the field of social sciences. The focus is on origination, need and the nature of interdisciplinary inquiry and the emerging movements towards the integration of the disciplines. In addition to looking into the politics of interdisciplinarity, present viewpoint tried to problematize classism, Eurocentrism and dominant meta-theory in the disciplinary constructions, showing the paradox inherent in its formation. KEYWORDS: interdisciplinarity, paradox, knowledge, metatheory, classism
Introduction: The Social Sciences in a Cross-disciplinary Age
Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 2015
As studies of the history of social science since 1945 have multiplied over the past decade and a half, it has not been unusual for commentators to present cross-disciplinary ventures as a byproduct of the disciplinary system and to contrast the stability of disciplines with the highs and lows of interdisciplinary relationships. In contrast, this special issue takes the view that cross-disciplinary ventures should be considered not so much as efforts to loosen up the disciplinary yoke, but as an alternative formof production and dissemination of social scientific knowledge. Paradoxically, the relationship between cross-disciplinary ventures and the disciplinary system appears as one of complementarity and not of dependence. The essays in the special issue provide examples of ways to reconsider what can be called the interdisciplinary chaos.
European Educational Research Journal, 2016
This paper investigates the interactions between policy drivers and academic practice in international research collaboration. It draws on the case of the Open Research Area (ORA), a funding scheme in the social sciences across four national research agencies, seeking to boost collaboration by supporting “integrated” projects. The paper discusses the scheme’s governance and its place within the European policy space before turning to awarded researchers’ perceptions of its originality and impact on their project’s emergence and development. Drawing on Bourdieu’s field theory, we analyse the scheme’s capacity to challenge researchers’ habitual collaborative practice as well as the hierarchical foundations of the social science field. We relate the discourses of researchers, located in France, Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom, to such structural dimensions of the academic profession as, disciplinary cultures, institutional environments and national performance managemen...
Institutional Perspectives: Working towards Coherence or Irreconcilable Diversity
The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutionalism (eds Morgan et al.), Chapter 1, 2010
This article starts with a description in broad strokes of the intellectual heritage shaping institutionalism in different social science disciplines. Then, a number of debates serve as points of entry to approach the question of coherence or diversity. The definition of institutions, the double issue of change and emergence, and the question of action and agency are explored in turn. Those are key questions today, with which scholars are grappling across and beyond disciplinary boundaries. A red thread throughout the article is to ponder whether the exploration of these questions reveals enduring and tight boundaries, or whether it shows instead increasing coherence and proximity within the broad institutionalist family. In the concluding section, the article goes back to this thread. Keywords: intellectual heritage, social science, coherence, diversity, proximity
Shaping Human Science Disciplines, 2019
An outline of the approach of the four years-collaborative research project International Cooperation in the Social Sciences and Humanities (INTERCO-SSH) from which the book has emanated. The focus is on the changing institutional infrastructures of the social and human sciences since 1945 in eight countries of Europe and beyond. While arguing that the organizational structures of scholarly disciplines allow a more rewarding analysis than studying ideas directly, the heuristically most productive implication of the institutional perspective appears to be its openness to international and interdisciplinary comparisons. After establishing in some detail the semantic scope of the key concepts ‘discipline’ and ‘institutionalization’, the authors present the research design and selected data upon which the following chapters rest.