‘In toto orbe primus omnium sacerdotum’: Pope Vigilius, Arator and the Petrine Primacy, in S. Blank & C. Cappuccio (ed.), L'universalità del papato medievale (sec. VI-XIII). Nuove prospettive di ricerca, Milano 2022, pp. 31-48. (original) (raw)
Arator’s Historia Apostolica was a product of papal literary patronage and part of an ideological strategy aimed at different but convergent purposes. It should demonstrate that the primacy of Peter had been already sanctioned by the evangelist Luke by overstating the role of the first apostle to the detriment of Paul. Peter’s primacy applied of course also to his successors, as is clear from the very beginning of the Historia Apostolica, where pope Vigilius is called “the first of all priests in the whole world”. Then, Arator’s books should strengthen papal authority in the West and for this reason they were sent also to Northern Italy and Gaul. The poem showed also that the pope was the real heir of imperial Rome, because he (through Arator) was able to master classical poetry and to support his ambitions with intertextual relations with classical authors of the Augustan period, thereby depriving Justinian of his role of defender of Rome.
Related papers
Bartolomeo Platina, Lives of the Popes, Paul II: An Intermediate Reader of Renaissance Latin
This edition aims to enable intermediate-level students of Latin to read the text in its original language. There is a substantial introduction that provides background on fifteenth-century Rome and on Latin in the Renaissance, as well as new research on the constitution of the text. The Latin text includes a running glossary and grammatical commentary on every page.
Petrine Primacy in Jeromes Commentary on Matthew
The question of the primacy of Peter and of its present day continuation in the persons of the bishops of Rome stands as probably the most challenging issue with consideration of ecumenical dispute. Even within the Catholic Church, the doctrine of papal primacy has proven to be viewed as a stumbling block, stemming anywhere from ignorance to blatant defiance, “from the medieval struggle between the imperium and sacerdotium to the present day demands for independence from central authority.” This internal struggle, coupled with the admittedly unreasonable protestant backlash against Peter’s primal role both beg further elucidation into the patristic stance behind the Catholic doctrine of Petrine primacy, without the repudiation of his fallen humanity. It is precisely because of this that prudence demands scholars to lend an attentive ear “to the witness of Sacred Scripture and to examine, with a sense of care, the faith of the nascent Church regarding this issue.” In that light, one considers how, across his Commentary on Matthew, St. Jerome attributes a significant number of mentions to St. Peter, implying, per Dr. Thomas Scheck, that “he assigned a sort of primacy to [Peter] among the apostles.” Jerome finds Peter to be a man of intensely burning faith and full of affection for Jesus. He is the one on whom Christ will build his Church; he did not remain in the darkness of denial. Yet on repeated occasions Jerome dismisses the interpretation of Hilary and others who had minimized Peter’s faults.” Thus, this paper will examine how, in his Commentary on Matthew, St. Jerome holistically presents St. Peter in a place of primacy amongst the apostles whilst not negating his weaknesses.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Related papers
P. Buzi, A. Camplani & F. Contardi (eds.), Coptic Society, Literature and Religion from Late Antiquity to Modern Times. Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Coptic Studies …, Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 247, Leuven, Paris & Bristol 2016, 969–978, 2016