OLYMPIC RULE 50 AND POLITICAL NEUTRALITY: IS IT TIME FOR A TURNING POINT? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Olympic Rule 50: Bane toward Human Rights implications for the Athletes
Linguistics and Culture Review, 2021
In the Tokyo Olympics, Raven Saunders, Bao Shanju and Zhong Tianshi were questioned by the IOC and got warnings due to their “performance of political demonstration” at the Olympic podium. We saw something similar during the 2012 London Olympic Summer Games when an indigenous boxer of Australia, Damien Hooper, was nearly disqualified from the Olympic competition for entering the ring wearing the Aboriginal flag shirt of Australia. The Olympics has had a history of maintaining a hypocritical form of political neutrality over the years. The Olympic Charter talks about sport being an essential medium in advancing the human rights of various individuals from different countries. However, it also chooses to stay neutral and gives preference to host nations. “Freedom of opinion and expression”, is a fundamental right enshrined in core international and regional human rights treaties and national laws. But it is also to be taken note that this freedom is restricted due to the “legitimate aims” of these treaties and laws. The Olympic Charter has followed suit and enacted a certain rule that prevents athletes from making demonstrations at the Olympic sites under the threat of disciplinary sanctions.
Neutrality of the Olympic Movement and Freedom of Expression: Legal and Practical Dilemmas.
Verfassungsblog, 2022
The relationship between sports and neutrality belongs to the most hotly debated topics in international sports law. This blog post illustrates the application of the neutrality principle in practice and argues that the athletes’ freedom of expression in sport is emerging as a ‘concession’ rather than as a ‘right’, suggesting that a reform of the regulations imposed by the Olympic Movement is urgently needed.
Despite Protest Rules the Olympics Have Never Been Neutral TIME
TIME, 2024
Since the 1955 Olympic Charter, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has sought to govern demonstrations and protest at the Games, which is now known as Rule 50 in its bylaws. While the wording, scope, and punishment around protest at the Games has since evolved, athlete protest has recently taken on renewed importance, and in recent years athletes have increasingly pushed the IOC to reevaluate Rule 50.
Olympism and the role of politics concerning the International Olympic Committee
Publications on general Interests , 2022
This paper will touch lightly on the current establishment of the International Olympic Committee, its counterparts, and its purpose. Throughout this paper, there will be thoughtfully curated arguments presenting a standing more closely against the IOC as an institution. The paper will focus mainly on the philosophy of Olympism and talk heavily about the political status of the IOC. Research will mainly support the consensus that the IOC is at fault for the political travesties of the Olympics for lack of policy to limiting countries' expression rather than athletes.
When the World Gathers: a political review of the Olympic Games
2019
“When the world gathers, there is always a chance for political change”1. Unluckily, in many occasions, international sport gatherings have produced boycotts, bans and even terrorist attacks, proving how sport has been linked to politics since its origin. Specifically, from their creation in the 8th century before Christ until today, the Olympic Games have been the site of increasingly visible protests and demonstrations by a wide array of international actors. In fact, the Olympic Games are the perfect context in which to understand the reflection of the real, social and political reality of the time, and, in many ways, they present a metaphor on the society within which they are celebrated. In the present essay, we qualitatively study press articles and existing bibliography to analyse the fronts of conflict and protests since the beginning of the modern Olympic Games, to try to understand why they have been such arenas for contention, in what ways this conflict has materialized within the functioning of the Games, and around what topics and societal cleavages these confrontations have arisen. Without entering into deep detail, the present essay provides a holistic overview of political conflict in the Olympic Games.
Olympics and Rule 40: A Critical Examination
Christ University Law Journal, 2016
The most awaited event in the world of sports has given rise to a controversy, following the recent amendment in the form of the much discussed, Rule 40, of the Olympic Charter. This move has been criticized due its various drawbacks. In the wake of the same, an attempt has been made to critically examine the situation, considering the aspects of commercial marketing, intellectual property attributes relating to the event, rights of athletes and most importantly the effective implementation of this rule. In the London Olympics, rule 40 had secured a mention due to the protests initiated by athletes, on various public platforms. In furtherance of a critical evaluation, controversies have been summarized and examined. In the effort to depict the failed attempts at bringing about a harmonious balance between rights of athletes and getaways available to the independent sponsors, possible impacts in various dimensions have been addressed. The recent advertisement campaign of Nike, which ...
The Sochi Winter Olympics were a triumph in the eyes of Russia and the International Olympic Committee (IOC). Yet, a controversy around the introduction of anti-propaganda laws in Russia that had been criticised for being discriminatory marred the efforts of the IOC to fulfil its self-proclaimed aspiration of ‘encouraging the harmonious development of man’. This article discusses the controversy utilising a legally pluralist approach to sports governance, and providing a critical reading of the practices of neoliberal globalisation that marked the issue of sexuality at the Sochi games. The paper argues that the legal influence of the IOC on domestic and international legal norms is contradictory and inconsistent. This, when considered alongside the aspirations of the IOC is significantly problematic and demonstrates the importance of investigating the underlying power structures of this influential international governing body.
The Olympic Movement in International Law
AJIL Unbound
The Olympic Movement has been self-regulated from the beginning, and its private ordering is governed by the domestic law of the nations in which its organizations are domiciled and operate. Nevertheless, it is also an institution of global governance, with important ties to international law. This essay examines the nature of those ties and the push for additional alignment between the norms of the Movement and international legal norms. I first provide a taxonomy of Olympic Movement organizations, centered on the attributes that are helpful to understanding the place of each in the global governance of sport and the value the organizations produce for their diverse stakeholders. I then describe demands from international law for additional alignment with human rights and governance norms and the standard response from sport. In the final section, I argue that regulatory autonomy is necessary for sport to produce the values expected by its stakeholders; domestic law, including as i...