Supporting the Creation of Scholarly Bibliographies by Communities through Online Reputation Based Social Collaboration (original) (raw)
Related papers
Sociobiblog: A decentralized platform for sharing bibliographic information
2007
Sharing of bibliographic information is very important in a research community. SocioBiblog is a semantic blogging system that provides a decentralized environment to share bibliographic information. It uses the SWRC ontology for adding metadata about publications in blogs and aggregates publications from the social network neighborhood and coauthors of the researcher. RSS aggregation has been extended to handle embedded publication metadata in BuRST feeds. The FOAF network of the researchers is crawled to gather FOAF profiles for discovering aggregation feeds. Interoperability with other systems has been maintained by adopting standard formats. The aggregated collections may be searched and filtered flexibly by defining metadata criteria. The aggregated and filtered results can be redistributed as new feeds which can further be used by other systems. Thus, a decentralized ecosystem can be formed where each unit can publish, aggregate and redistribute information.
New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation
The article reports on a study of the views and actions of nearly a hundred scholars -mostly academic researchers from four European countries and four disciplines -in regard to scholarly reputation in the Science 2.0 age. It specifically looks at the role that 'emerging' reputational mechanisms and platforms are playing in building, maintaining, and showcasing scholarly reputation in the digital age. Popular examples of such platforms are ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Data were obtained through one-to-one interviews and focus groups, supported by desk research. The main findings were: (a) it is early days and uptake is light and patchy with platforms largely used for non-reputational purposes, such as sharing documents; (b) most users were passive and did not fully engage with the social aspects of the platforms; (c) the reputational focus was very much on just one scholarly activity (research), on just two outputs of that activity (publications and conferences) and one measurement of that activity (citations), but there are the stirrings of change; (d) young researchers are set to profit most from the emerging platforms.
Social media as a source of bibliographic information in the Humanities. Research report
Purpose/thesis: The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a pilot study on the certain elements of information’ behavior of Polish humanists, employees of Polish universities, effectuated in social networks. The central idea of the presented paper is the use of the social networks as a source of bibliographic information on new publications in one’s own discipline. The concept/research methods: The pilot study of this type of information’ behavior was conducted in May 2016 using a questionnaire made available on Facebook. It was addressed to Polish scholars representing the humanities and social sciences. There was also carried out a research to find foreign articles devoted to this issue, to present a global state of research on this matter. Furthermore, on this background it was to outline the state of research in Poland. Results and conclusions: Foreign researchers are unanimous about the fact that the use of the social media increases the number of citations and improves the overall social impact of academics actively using this form of popularization. Polish scientists are increasingly eager to use social media seeking information and creating a network of contacts, but still the possibilities offered by the new new media are not fully used. Originality/the cognitive value: In Poland so far no research on this form of informal communication behavior of universities’ employees were conducted.
This article explores building blocks in extant and emerging social media toward the possibilities they offer to the scholarly edition in electronic form, positing that we are witnessing the nascent stages of a new ‘social’ edition existing at the intersection of social media and digital editing. Beginning with a typological formulation of electronic scholarly editions, activities common to humanities scholars who engage with texts as expert readers are considered, noting that many methods of engagement both reflect the interrelated nature of long-standing professional reading strategies and are social in nature; extending this frame work, the next steps in the scholarly edition’s development in its incorporation of social media functionality reflect the importance of traditional humanistic activities and workflows, and include collaboration, incorporating contributions by its readers and re-visioning the role of the editor away from that of ultimate authority and more toward that of facilitator of reader involvement. Intended to provide a ‘toolkit’ for academic consideration, this discussion of the emerging social edition points to new methods of textual engagement in digital literary studies and is accompanied by two integral, detailed appendices, published in Digital Humanities Quarterly under the title ‘Pertinent discussions toward modeling the social edition: Annotated bibliographies’ (http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/6/1/000111/000111.html): one addressing issues pertinent to online reading and interaction, and another on social networking tools.
Procedia Technology, 2013
The current impact of financial crisis on societal and scien volumes of data in a socially-mediated interaction contex scale. Existing mechanisms are inefficient for a single hu a large number of publications. This time-consuming and effort grounded on scientific metrics and theoretical foun representations. This paper reports on a work in progress semantic analytics focused on what scientific research da of intellectual labor among social, computer, and citizen to traditional bibliometric approaches, attempting to unco connections can be examined to demonstrate how a scient ntific frameworks has raised the need to harvest and evaluate vast xt to reduce knowledge gaps and accelerate innovation at a global uman to classify and transform data into knowledge patterns from computationally difficult activity requires a substantial cognitive dations to produce quality metadata through different knowledge community self-organizing bibliographic information system for ata mean, and how they can be best interpreted through a division scientists. Such a crowd labor ecosystem should be not restricted over patterns and trends in publication data sets whilst intellectual tific field is conceptually, intellectually, and socially structured.
Network-Driven Reputation in Online Scientific Communities
The ever-increasing quantity and complexity of scientific production have made it difficult for researchers to keep track of advances in their own fields. This, together with growing popularity of online scientific communities, calls for the development of effective information filtering tools. We propose here an algorithm which simultaneously computes reputation of users and fitness of papers in a bipartite network representing an online scientific community. Evaluation on artificiallygenerated data and real data from the Econophysics Forum is used to determine the method's best-performing variants. We show that when the input data is extended to a multilayer network including users, papers and authors and the algorithm is correspondingly modified, the resulting performance improves on multiple levels. In particular, top papers have higher citation count and top authors have higher h-index than top papers and top authors chosen by other algorithms. We finally show that our algorithm is robust against persistent authors (spammers) which makes the method readily applicable to the existing online scientific communities.
Scholarometer: A Social Framework for Analyzing Impact across Disciplines
2012
The use of quantitative metrics to gauge the impact of scholarly publications, authors, and disciplines is predicated on the availability of reliable usage and annotation data. Citation and download counts are widely available from digital libraries. However, current annotation systems rely on proprietary labels, refer to journals but not articles or authors, and are manually curated. To address these limitations, we propose a social framework based on crowdsourced annotations of scholars, designed to keep up with the rapidly evolving disciplinary and interdisciplinary landscape. We describe a system called Scholarometer, which provides a service to scholars by computing citation-based impact measures. This creates an incentive for users to provide disciplinary annotations of authors, which in turn can be used to compute disciplinary metrics. We first present the system architecture and several heuristics to deal with noisy bibliographic and annotation data. We report on data sharing and interactive visualization services enabled by Scholarometer. Usage statistics, illustrating the data collected and shared through the framework, suggest that the proposed crowdsourcing approach can be successful. Secondly, we illustrate how the disciplinary bibliometric indicators elicited by Scholarometer allow us to implement for the first time a universal impact measure proposed in the literature. Our evaluation suggests that this metric provides an effective means for comparing scholarly impact across disciplinary boundaries.
Scholarly activities and reputation in the digital age: A conceptual framework
The paper, which should be seen as a work in progress, provides a conceptual framework of the tasks and activities that comprise the present-day scholarly undertaking and their potentially reputation building, maintaining and enhancing components. Guided by Boyer's (1990) categorisation of scholarly activities, the framework was derived from an analytical literature review and takes cognizance of the rise of Web 2.0, and the collaboration and sharing paradigm it has brought with it. The resulting schema lays down a blueprint for the assessment of scholarly reputation, consisting, as it does, of the range of traditional and novel, offline and online activities typically undertaken by scholars as they go about their pursuits in an increasingly open-values based digital and networked environment.
Scholarly social media profiles and libraries: A review
LIBER Quarterly
This article aims to point out emerging roles and responsibilities for academic librarians with the potential of better integrating the library in the research process. In order to find out how to enhance the online reputation and discoverability of individual faculty members as well as their affiliated institutions, the authors worked side-by-side with researchers in the United States and Europe to explore, create, revise, and disambiguate scholarly profiles in various software applications. In an attempt to understand and organize scholarly social media, including new, alternative metrics, the authors reviewed and classified the major academic profile platforms, highlighting the overlapping elements, benefits, and drawbacks inherent in each. The consensus is that it would be time-consuming to keep one’s profile current and accurate on all of these platforms, given the plethora of underlying problems, also discussed in detail in the article. However, it came as a startling discover...