Panel discussion role of a phenomenological validation and integral experiments for maturing the predictive simulations (original) (raw)
Related papers
Using of BEPU methodology in a Final Safety Analysis Report
2015
The Nuclear Reactor Safety (NRS) has been established since the discovery of nuclear fission, and the occurrence of accidents in Nuclear Power Plants worldwide has contributed for its improvement. The Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) must contain complete information concerning safety of the plant and plant site, and must be seen as a compendium of NRS. The FSAR integrates both the licensing requirements and the analytical techniques. The analytical techniques can be applied by using a realistic approach, addressing the uncertainties of the results. This work aims to show an overview of the main analytical techniques that can be applied with a Best Estimated Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) methodology, which is „the best one can do‟, as well as the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle. Moreover, the paper intends to demonstrate the background of the licensing process through the main licensing requirements.
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2012
Design guideline safety factors (SF) are based on the accumulated experience of the industry and account for the uncertainty and variability inherent in the wastewater treatment process. Models on the other hand, as implemented in most commercial simulators, do not explicitly account for uncertainty. This paper discusses how to deal with variability and uncertainty in an explicit way when using a dynamic model combined with uncertainty analysis to perform a post-project evaluation. Through the use of time series, the response of the design to the variability of key inputs can be captured in the dynamic model. In order to incorporate uncertainty, selected model parameters can be described with probability density functions (PDF). Scenario analysis can be used to simulate discreet operational conditions or events. Uncertainty can then be propagated to the dynamic model outputs with the use of Monte Carlo simulations. To test this approach, the upgrade of the Eindhoven WWTP (Waterboard De Dommel, The Netherlands) was selected as a case study. The project focused on how variability and uncertainty are incorporated in design guidelines and highlighted key issues linked to the inclusion of the sources of uncertainty in the calibrated model.
Model-Based Safety Assessment Review of the Discipline and its Challenges
— Since its emergence in 1990s, Model-Based Safety Assessment (MBSA) has enjoyed significant interest from both academia and industry. The last decade has seen not only the development of a number of methods, techniques and tools, but also the gradual adoption of MBSA techniques by industry and its acceptance by regulators. However, the field of MBSA encompasses a large number of fundamentally dissimilar techniques. This paper presents a simple classification schema for MBSA techniques based on two criteria – provenance of the model and engineering semantics of component dependencies captured by the model. The classification organizes the existing techniques into a number of coherent families. Applicability, limitations and challenges of most prominent families of MBSA techniques are presented, and some of the common challenges faced by MBSA discipline are discussed.
Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2014
This paper describes a systematic framework for characterizing important phenomena and quantifying the degree of contribution of each parameter to the output in severe accident uncertainty assessment. The proposed methodology comprises qualitative as well as quantitative phases. The qualitative part so called Modified PIRT, being a robust process of PIRT for more precise quantification of uncertainties, is a two step process for identifying and ranking based on uncertainty importance in severe accident phenomena. In this process identified severe accident phenomena are ranked according to their effect on the figure of merit and their level of knowledge. Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) serves here as a systematic approach for severe accident phenomena ranking. Formal uncertainty importance technique is used to estimate the degree of credibility of the severe accident model(s) used to represent the important phenomena. The methodology uses subjective justification by evaluating available information and data from experiments, and code predictions for this step. The quantitative part utilizes uncertainty importance measures for the quantification of the effect of each input parameter to the output uncertainty. A response surface fitting approach is proposed for estimating associated uncertainties with less calculation cost. The quantitative results are used to plan in reducing epistemic uncertainty in the output variable(s). The application of the proposed methodology is demonstrated for the ACRR MP-2 severe accident test facility.
Simulation and Prediction in Safety Case Evidence
2008
The use of simulation in safety analysis is often criticised. We are faced, however, with safety critical systems of ever-greater complexity, and with the demand to extend safety engineering to cover large-scale sociotechnical systems such as hospitals and military forces. Simulation methods offer ways to analyse aspects of these systems that other, ‘traditional’ methods cannot, because of size, complexity or non-linear behaviour. It would be foolish to claim that simulation techniques aren’t frequently misused, or that there haven’t been serious errors influenced by poor simulation. Every method of analysis and prediction, however, has its own risks, flaws and limitations. The solution is twofold; first, an engineer must know the specific capabilities and limits of the methods that they use, and hence know what information they can give and how they complement each other. Second, an operator must update their predictions (from both accidents and near-miss incidents) as part of thei...
Initial Development of Statistically Based Validation Process for Computational Simulation
The initial development of a statistically-based process for validation of computational experiments is presented. The focus of this newer methodology is Uncertainty Quantification (UQ), Sensitivity Analysis (SA), and variance reduction. The two types of uncertainty (aleatory and epistemic) are incorporated into the methodology. For this investigation, the behavior of the simulation inputs is presumed unknown (aleatory due to lack-of-knowledge) and is therefore modeled using equally-probable uniform distributions. These distributions have known and quantifiable uncertainties that are used to determine the sampling residuals that are expected to follow a random normal distribution (epistemic with known mean and variance). Statisticallybased sample sizes and uncertainty propagation limits are determined based upon a priori tolerance specifications as well as Type I and Type II risks. Newer quasi-random sampling procedures are demonstrated to be superior to classical pseudo-random sampling procedures. A simple example is presented that outlines the methodology that is extensible to all validation processes.
Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Highlights Option 4 Deterministic Safety Analysis Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) methodology Extended BEPU Realistic safety systems configurations PSA-based configurations