THE IDENTITY CONSTRUCTION OF GEORGE W. BUSH IN 'STATE OF THE UNION (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Representation of a Presidential Speech: A Critical Discourse Analysis
One of the main functions of critical discourse analysis (CDA) is to chain linguistic categories to ideological functions. The way social actors are ideologically and grammatically represented, and the interaction between ideology and discourse are taken into account in the realm of critical discourse analysis. The present study set out to critically analyze Palestinian and Israelis representation in George W. Bush's political discourse. The present study employed the analytical framework developed by Van Leeuwen (1996) in order to investigate the passive and active representations of these two communities. Besides the analytical framework, the study also benefited from the political discourse analysis (PDA) meticulously developed by Van Dijk (1998). The quantitative analysis of data indicated that there were significant differences between Israeli and Palestinian activation and beneficialisation in terms of distribution. Ideologically speaking, the results also suggested that t...
Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Studi Amerika
This paper investigates the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) in studying the inauguration speech of Donald Trump at the Capitol Hill, Washington DC on January 20, 2017. The objective of the study is to uncover the hidden messages regarding ideologies shared and critiques appointed to Obama’s presidency. The paper uses the theory of CDA by Norman Fairclough by focusing on the three aspects of research which are (1) micro or linguistic analysis, (2) Mezzo or discursive analysis, and (3) macro or contextual analysis. The three dimensional model of CDA is aimed to uncover the ideologies shared and critiques appointed to based on linguistic features, socio-political aspect, and discursive practice. The American Dream is represented in seven issues risen which are (1) US economic condition during Obama’s presidency, (2) US political condition during Obama’s presidency, (3) US social condition during Obama’s presidency, (4) The concept of making America great again, (5) Anti-radical Musli...
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s Inaugural Address in 2017
International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 2020
The current research work is a critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump's Inaugural Address (2017). The researcher has made use of Ruth Wodak’s Discourse Historical Model (2004) to study the inaugural address. Moreover, the current research work is qualitative in its approach and analysis, as it answers the research questions in accordance with Ruth Wodak’s Discourse Historical Model (2004). Furthermore, research design used in this research is both descriptive and explanatory; and, it also contains purposive sampling as a data collection method. Although much CDA research has been already carried out on Trump’s speeches, the current research studies Trump’s speech in the context of history and power using Ruth Wodak’s Discourse Historical Model (2004). The researcher has focused lexical and syntactic items in Trump’s speech. Besides, the researcher has found out that power relations, historical norms, ideological constraints, and American values have played a significant rol...
Critical Discourse Analysis of Obama's Political Discourse
This paper examines the persuasive strategies of President Obama's public speaking as well as the covert ideology of the same, enshrined in his inaugural address. Our analysis is grounded in Norman Fairclough's assumptions in critical discourse analysis, claiming that "ideologies reside in texts" that "it is not possible to 'read off' ideologies from texts" and that "texts are open to diverse interpretations" .The selected corpus' ideological and persuasive components are assessed, thus revealing Obama's persuasive strategies.
The Representation of Iran and United States in Donald Trump’s Speech: A Critical Discourse Analysis
2020
Speech plays an important role to shape public perception as it is delivered by an influential figure and reflects the points of view of its speaker. This study discusses a speech delivered by the United States President, Donald Trump, which discusses the conflict between Iran and America. This study was conducted to reveal the representation of Iran and the United States in one of Donald Trump’s speeches. The method used in this study is the descriptive qualitative method. The data in this study are in the form of words, phrases, clauses, and sentences that indicate the position of Iran and the United States taken from the speech transcript from the official website of The White House. Data were analyzed under the framework of Van Djik’s Socio-Cognitive Approach, consisting of text, socio-cognitive, and social context. Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that Iran is described as a country that has nuclear ambitions and acts of terror that support the existence of terrorists...
Critical Discourse Analysis of Trump Across Time
Sustainable Multilingualism
Summary This study explores the discourse of Trump as a businessman and as a president regarding the topic of immigration. Data for this research were gathered from four speeches and four interviews delivered by Trump in the eighties-nineties and four speeches and four interviews after being elected president. The analysis focuses on the way Trump represents US (ingroup) versus THEM (outgroup) at the local semantic level through the use of pronouns and implicatures and, at the local form through the use of syntax, that is, the formal relationship between clauses and sentences. In particular, I want to shed light on the following research questions: (1) How does Donald Trump represent the topic of immigration as a businessman? (2) How does Donald Trump represent the topic of immigration as a president? On the basis of the results of this research, it can be concluded that the period in which the discourse was uttered seems to have a strong bearing on the discursive strategies employe...
A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Address of President Dr
2019
The purpose of this study is to find out the important themes and the ideologies behind the linguistic features used in the speech of President Dr. Mohammad Ashraf Ghani, the president of Afghanistan. The speech was delivered to the joint meeting of the US Congress on 25 March 2015 in the United States of America. This speech is important because it has been delivered in a critical time when Afghanistan was passing through a critical phase of taking the responsibility of the war against terrorism from the international forces. The researcher has analyzed the introductory part of the speech through the three-dimensional approach of Fairclough. The analysis of the linguistic features indicated that the speaker was not only seeking to strengthen the existing relations but also trying to establish new economical, educational, and political ties with the US. The speaker has also tried to convince the audience (The US Congressmen and women) that the US in harmony with the world has to tak...
Analyzing Discourse from a Critical Perspective
The aim of the present paper is to synthesize critical discourse analysis terminology and to utilize it in analyzing a political speech by President George W. Bush concerning the situation in Iraq. The speech is from 2004 and the reason why it was chosen is that it presents quite clearly the American presidency's ideology behind the war in Iraq and also the most relevant discourse techniques meant to attract the support of the population for this mission.
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama " s Speeches
The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the public speech, in which the speaker wins favorite response from the audience. This paper, based on Critical Discourse Analysis theory and Systematic Functional Linguistics, analyzes Barack Obama's presidential speeches mainly from the point of transitivity and modality, in which we can learn the language how to serve the ideology and power. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.