Communication spaces (original) (raw)
Related papers
Conceptualizing Social Interactions in Networked Spaces
This chapter argues for the rigid dichotomies between online and offline in current discourse on social interactions to be reconsidered. By identifying that space is produced by the intersection of interactions it can be said that online and offline narratives are situated relationally rather than dichotomously. Drawing on the concept of affordances (Gibson, 1977, 1986; Norman, 1988; Hogan, 2009) and the work of Doreen Massey (1994, 2005, 2009), it can be shown that subjects act on perceived affordances in narratives of online and offline relations which intersect to produce the spaces in which social interactions are situated. This chapter proposes the concept of ‘networked spaces’ as a strategy for resolving the problematic binary of online and offline. Networked spaces are dynamic, the contexts or narratives within them relational. It is through the lived experiences of interactions in these spaces that the contexts of social interactions are suggested to be best examined.
Agency of interactive space in social relationship
2019
Embedded computation allows built space to be intelligent and get smarter, becoming interactive and gaining agency with ability not to merely adapt to changing conditions, but to process information and react, observe and learn, communicate and make decisions. The paper investigates agency of interactive space based on interpretation of input data, like users‘response to the spatial agency, data from environment or other actors, and ability to change its performance accordingly. The research is focused on the role of interactive space as an active participant in social relationship communicating with users, constantly changing and having its’ attitude. The research is aimed at defining social role of interactive environments and explains how they interact with users, what qualities are enabled by interactive behaviour and how do they influence space perception, revealing the significance of bi-directional communication between society and smart spaces. Interactive space does not jus...
Conceptualising Social Space in Cyberspace: A Study of the Interactions in Online Discussion forums
2005
The study introduces an alternative analytic framework for the investigation of online discussion forums. It focuses on the social dynamics occurring in online discussion threads situated within a tertiary e-learning context, and advocated by social learning theories. Online discussion forums are perceived as conducive environments for the evolvement and support of collaborative and socio-constructivist learning. However, the literature reviewed, revealed a growing need for finding empiric frameworks for ascertaining the ...
Space in social interaction. An introduction
Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquee
This issue addresses the relation between language and space by studying everyday settings of social interaction. 1 All contributions analyse videorecorded instances of interaction and focus, to different degrees, on the ways in which the available multimodal resources -talk, gaze, gesture, body positioning, objects, etc. -are used and coordinated for the practical purposes of the interaction. The authors employ research methods developed in empirically grounded approaches to interaction such as conversation analysis, interactional linguistics and multimodal interaction analysis. This issue is organised around four main thematic areas -Spatialities, Interactional space, Place names and deictics, Evolving spaces -that are also the fil rouge of the following state of the art developments on the relevance of space in linguistic investigations.
Is Cyberspace A Space? A preliminary exploration of the spatial phenomena in the internet
This study attempts to join the current interdisciplinary discussion on the issue of ''space'', and to obtain new definition as well as insightful understanding of "space". As a preliminary exploration, the main objective of this study is to discover the elements involved in Internet space creation and to examine the relationship between human participants and Internet spaces. In addition, this study also attempts to investigate whether participants from different academic disciplines define or experience Internet spaces in different ways, and to find what spatial elements of Internet they emphasize the most. We hope that our findings would ultimately be also useful for contemporary architectural designers and scholars in their designs in the real world and virtual world.
Informal Interaction in Virtual Spaces
The most significant feature of cyberspace is that it is a shared artificial space--a social space. As more human interaction takes place in this space of electronic connectivity, we should expect to see more of the everyday phenomena of social interaction reproduced. Conversations must be initiated, their agendas negotiated, and their termination agreed upon. Participants must achieve their conversational goals while maintaining their status and without giving risking offense to the status of their coparticipants. Shared meanings ...
Structuring a communication space on the Internet
RESEAUX- …, 2000
In Internet communication, electronic writing is the only way to conduct relationships, in contrast to other communication situations such as telephone and face-to-face conversations. This means that participants are obliged to explain and manifest the structural elements of their interactions in writing. Written conversations have to formulate explicit substitutes for communication cues, such as tone of voice, body language and dress, that are implicit in everyday social interaction. From this point of view, the study of such conversations may throw some light on the mechanisms used for structuring social relations in general. Citer ce document / Cite this document : Baudouin Valérie, Velkovska Julia, Ridel Pauline. Structuring a communication space on the Internet. Newsgroups, web sites and email.
Journal of Work-Applied Management, 2021
PurposeHow can social presence, participation and a sense of community be formed in an online setting without compromising on social connectedness through physical distancing? Under consideration of the goals for an Education for Sustainable Development, transformative science and the social techniques of Theory U, developed by Otto Scharmer (2016), an online Community of Inquiry of researchers, practitioners and learners was to be developed, followed and observed to discuss the question whether and how it was possible to create an awareness-based, future-oriented and socially committed online community that would enrich social transformation processes.Design/methodology/approachMethods of 1st, 2nd and 3rd person research were applied, as well as group discussions, one Mentimeter survey and one standardised questionnaire with an open question.FindingsResults indicate that it is not only possible to create a feeling of community in an online setting, but also point to the terms and c...
Space and Place in Human Communication
Office hours after class or Friday 11-12 mcc-ue-1002-001 m-w 11am-12:15 12WV L111 space and place in human communication Course Description: How do we conceptualize and represent space? How do we locate ourselves and Others in space ("here" and "there")? How do we divide spaces into socially significant regions, or, to put it another way, how do we construct places? How do we identify ourselves and others through places and regions? How do we order and control spaces and places? Answers to these questions vary depending on where and when "we" are. In this class we look at some classic arguments on space and place derived from investigations into: 1. Language-the diversity of expressions of spatial and directional concepts in different languages (including deixis) 2. Communication-face-to-face and mediated interactions that depend on and construct spatial frames, divisions, and orientations. 3. Spatial representations-paintings, photographs, paper maps, film, interactive satellite maps, etc. 4. Spatial structures-buildings, roads, bridges, doors, fences, etc. 5. Spatial practices-territory and sovereignty; land as power, land as wealth; policing, regulating. Course Goals: 1. Develop a sophisticated understanding of how conceptions of space, spatial divisions, and places (as social structures, that may or may not be realized architecturally) are formed and organized through social and communicative practice (and, ipso facto, language). 2. Develop a basic familiarity with a range of research methods used in social science, including ethnographic observation, archival research, textual analysis, and data collection.