A Probe into Impediments of Benefit Gain in Investment Contracts of Oil and Gas Industries (original) (raw)
Related papers
Reflections on the law applicable to international oil contracts
The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 2013
Business activity in the hydrocarbon sector, involving the extraction of natural resources essential to maintain our modern lifestyle, begins with the negotiation of oil and gas exploration and exploitation contracts. Apart from the traditional role of the parties' contractual autonomy, determining the legal regime of these contracts necessitates considering the role of international law, the development of oil sector-specific international rules (lex petrolea), and the impact of the imperative norms of national legal systems, especially in expropriation cases and in those situations in which investments or commercial transactions in a particular State are subject to limits or prohibitions relating to economic coercion measures.
Contractual Systems in the Oil and Gas Sector: Current Status and Development
Energies
Production activities in the oil and gas industry are capital-intensive and associated with high technology, with these assets not always being available to oil-producing countries or national companies. Any form of interaction between the parties involved in natural resource extraction requires clear regulation regarding contractual relationships. This study attempts to analyze Indonesia’s production sharing contract system in order to assess its applicability to other conditions. The article covers the key aspects of contract theory, provides a classification of contractual systems in the oil and gas sector, and discusses the most common types of contractual agreements. It also considers the key principles of production sharing contracts (PSCs), analyzes the development of PSC practices in Indonesia over the past sixty years, and highlights PSC advantages and disadvantages.
Rethinking the Stability of Petroleum Contracts amidst a Dynamic Legal Environment
The conflict between sovereignty and investor’s interest in the global petroleum industry continues to be worrisome to the legitimate expectations of foreign investors. On the one hand, states seek flexibility in petroleum contracts entered with investors. On the other hand, investors seek a stable regime. Different stabilisation frameworks have been explored, with no (or too little) avail. Consequently, this article argues that the use of Negotiated Economic Balancing Clauses may portend a better interest-balancing regime between sovereign states and foreign investors.
Constitutionality In Production Sharing Contracts: Legal Policy On Petroleum And Natural Gas
Prophetic Law Review, 2020
This research is focused on constitutionality issue of Law No. 22 Year 2001 on Petroleum and Natural Gas and its relation to Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution and constitutionality of production sharing contract in relation to Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. This research uses normative juridical method. This research founds: first, the current Law on Petroleum and Natural Gas and its relation to Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution is conceptually still problematic. This is evidenced by the several law articles which had been quashed by the Constitutional Court because they contradict the 1945 Constitution. Second, the petroleum and gas business contracts still contradict the spirit of Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution, this can be seen by the granting of requests for judicial review of the Law on Petroleum and Gas in the Constitutional Court.
An economic analysis of Iranian petroleum contract
Petroleum Science, 2020
Following three generations of buyback contracts, the new model of Iranian petroleum contracts (IPC) was introduced by the Iranian cabinet to incentivize investments in the country. This paper analyzes the fiscal terms of the contract with technical information from one of the candidate fields for licensing. The financial simulation shows that, in general, the IPC resembles more a service contract than a production sharing contract as the contractor’s take is relatively low—below 5% across different scenarios of crude oil price. Second, the IPC is progressive in that as the overall profitability of the project improves the government takes an increasing share of the economic rent. The results are confirmed in a sensitivity analysis of each party’s profitability and takes on oil price, CAPEX, OPEX and the fee.
The Nature of Iranian Petroleum Contracts in Upstream Section
International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 2014
Petroleum contracts are an important and sensitive issue in Iranian petroleum industry. Monitoring on petroleum contracts especially in upstream section is too important due to length of term and high financial volume. After Islamic revolution in Iran, a challenging discussion between the Parliament and Government was the supervision and approval of petroleum contracts by Parliament. Article 77 of Iranian Constitutional Law permits the Parliament to monitor on international agreements directly. Therefore, determining the nature of petroleum contracts would highly impact on this kind of supervision by the Parliament. However, Parliament can monitor on these contract properly by using its authorities mentioned in the Constitutional Law and by codification or modifying relevant laws including the Law to Modify Petroleum Law.
Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization
The operating activities of the petroleum sector require large amounts of money and high levels of experience and technology that cannot be provided exclusively by most oil-producing countries or their public companies. Therefore, concluding a petroleum exploration and production contract is necessary to address the rights and obligations of the host State and international oil companies; while, various types of petroleum contracts have been developed to address those rights and obligations. In the Kurdistan Region, as an oil-producing region, oil and gas resources are being explored and produced by international oil companies, under production sharing contracts. This study attempts to appraise traditional and modern types of petroleum exploration and production contracts in detail, to examine the fundamental differences and similarities between them; and also to analyse the Kurdistan Region's production sharing contracts. This research has clarified that the traditional contracts of different types of petroleum contracts are quite different, however, the modern contracts have many provisions in common. Therefore, currently, the choice of contract type might be less important than the content of particular contractual provisions. Finally, the research has clarified that the Kurdistan Region's production sharing contracts comprise several positive provisions that have attracted a wide range of international oil companies to invest in the Kurdistan Region.
Arbitration of oil contracts in oil-producing Arab countries
Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), 2020
In this article, the principles of governing arbitration in Arab oil contracts are investigated.It focused on the independent nature of arbitration and the distinguished characteristics that make an arbitration the most preferable means to settle international economic disputes. As well asitsheds light on the arbitration agreement which included in the oil contracts in a way that excludes this agreement from the legal rules that usually prevent such agreements from developing in scope and content on the one hand, whereas, on the other hand, the article takes a look on the arbitration tribunal (An arbitral tribunal) that resulted from the arbitration agreement that included in the oil contracts which have a special characteristics that distinguishes them from any other contracts in other economical and trading ventures. The article concluded it is better for the disputes resulting from the oil contracts to be resolved via arbitration thus, arbitration remains the most popular method for resolving international trade disputes. Additionally, settlement of disputes for issuing the arbitration decision should be acceptability by both parties in conflict, if arbitration is established by agreement, it is more flexible there is a greater chance of implementation. Finally, the researcher recommends arbitration as the only viable tool in settling conflicts/disputes of oil contracts in oil-producing Arab countries because it is generally faster and less expensive than going to court, most reliable, less expensive and save a lot of time by allowing resolution in weeks or months.
Investigating and Comparing Petroleum Contract Models from Effective Control Lens in Contracts
The Asian Institute of Research, 2020
Selecting the suitable petroleum contract pattern is one of the most sensitive in oil activities after the initial petroleum negotiations, whereas different petroleum contracts have emerged due to the willingness of the host government to grant control and oversight of petroleum activity to the International Oil Company. The right to control effectively is the key to earning more and longer-term profit and impact on project economics for each of the parties. Occasionally, this right to effective control creates a major challenge for host countries and international and transnational oil companies. In the meantime, domestic law requirements play an important role along with the willingness of governments to maintain or grant effective control.