Professional learning for academics teaching first-year undergraduate students (original) (raw)

Abstract

Professional learning is an essential component of the institutional conditions required for a high-quality first-year student experience. Initiatives to improve students' determinative first year in higher education have expanded but one area notably absent in the literature pertains to professional learning tailored to meet the needs of academics teaching first-year students. The aims of this study were to explore what academics need to do and understand to effectively teach first-year students and design professional learning that would support them in their teaching role. Evidence-based practice was the methodology chosen for the project as this enabled relevant literature to inform academic practice. Findings from the study revealed that professional learning is intrinsic to being an academic. To be effective teachers and make a positive impact on first-year students' learning necessitates that academics have an ability to draw on key knowledge, skills and attributes. However, these constructs are not finite and to be responsive to the evolving needs of students, professional learning for academics should be multi-faceted, ongoing and integral to everyday practice. Based on these findings two frameworks are presented that could be used by staff teaching first-year students to guide their professional learning.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (95)

  1. Contemporary assessment and evaluation research and theory to inform and expand practice: Brown et al. 2010; Chickering and Gamson 1991; Friesen 2009; Fullan and Langworthy 2014; Higher Education Academy 2011; Nelson et al. 2014; Yorke and Longden 2008.
  2. Design and plan learning activities: Chalmers et al. 2014; Fullan and Langworthy 2014; Hattie 2015; Lawrence et al. 2016; Scott 2015.
  3. Teach critical thinking, problem-solving, creativity, collaboration, cooperation and communication: Allen and Coleman 2011; Chickering and Gamson 1991; Florida, Gates, Knudsen and Stolarick 2006; Kivunja 2014a, Kivunja 2014b; Evans, Mujis and Tomlinson 2015; Hattie 2015; Scott 2015.
  4. Liaise with support services in areas such as careers, student welfare and learning skills: Baik et al. 2015; Pegg et al. 2012.
  5. Deploy information and educational technologies and social media to enhance students' learning and academic practice: Darling-Hammond, Hyler, Gardner 2017; Fullan and Langworthy 2014; Higher Education Academy 2011; Loucks-Horsley et al. 1998; Raghunatha, Anker, and Nortcliffe 2016; Scott 2015.
  6. Engage in active listening and communicate at a high level in verbal and written formats: Chalmers et al. 2014; Davies et al. 2011.
  7. Interact effectively with learners from a variety of cultures, identify language, literacy and numeracy needs and seek advice where required to meet learner needs: Leask and Carroll 2013; Ryan 2012.
  8. Organise work activities, manage time effectively and administer resources: Davies et al. 2011.
  9. Work cooperatively with others in groups, teams and communities: Bovill et al. 2011; Brown et al. 2010; Darling-Hammond et al. 2017; Hattie 2015;
  10. van Waes, van den Bossche, Moolenaar, Stes and van Petergem 2015.
  11. Engage and motivate students in their learning: Chalmers et al. 2014; Chickering and Gamson 1999; Fullan and Langworthy 2014; Hattie 2015; Leask and Carroll 2013.
  12. Pursue a commitment to ongoing professional learning: Chalmers 2007; Chalmers et al. 2014; Higher Education Academy 2011; Tinto 2009.
  13. Be adaptable and flexible when responding to the needs of students: Chalmers et al. 2014.
  14. Establish, respectful, inclusive, cooperative and professional relationships;
  15. Davies et al. 2011
  16. Critically reflect on practice: Ashwin et al. 2015; Moon
  17. Ahn, B. and Cox, M., 2016. Knowledge, skills, and attributes of graduate student and postdoctoral mentors in undergraduate research settings. The research journal for engineering education, 105, 605-629. doi:10.1002/ jee.20129
  18. Aitsl, 2014. Designing professional learning. Melbourne: Aitsl. Available from: https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default- source/default-document-library/designing_professional_learning_report.pdf?sfvrsn=4
  19. Allen, B. and Colemen, K., 2011. The creative graduate: cultivating and assessing creativity with eportfolios. In: G. Williams, et al., eds. ASCILITE. Hobart: ASCILITE, 59-69.
  20. Almarghani, E. and Mijatovic, I., 2017. Factors affecting student engagement in HEIs -it is all about good teaching. Teaching in higher education, 22 (8), 940-956. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1319808
  21. Ambler, T., Harvey, M., and Cahir, J., 2016. University academics' experiences of learning through mentoring. The Australian educational researcher, 43, 609-627.
  22. Arkoudis, S., et al., 2014. English language proficiency and employability framework: for Australian higher education institutions. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
  23. Ashwin, P., et al., 2015. Reflective teaching in higher education. New York: Bloomsbury.
  24. Australian Government, 2015. Higher education standards framework (Threshold standards). Canberra.
  25. Baik, C., Naylor, R., and Arkoudis, S., 2015. The first-year experience in Australian universities: findings from two decades, 1994 -2014. Melbourne: U.O. Melbourne.
  26. Becher, T. 1999. Professional practices: commitment and capability in a changing environment. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  27. Bovill, C., Bulley, C., and Morss, K., 2011. Engaging and empowering first-year students through curriculum design: perspectives from the literature. Teaching in higher education, 16, 197-209. doi:10.1080/ 13562517.2010.515024
  28. Brown, N., et al., 2010. A professional development framework for teaching in higher education. In: M. Devlin, J. Nagy, and A. Lichtenberg, eds. Research and development in higher education: reshaping higher education. Melbourne: HERDSA, 133-143.
  29. Calnin, G., 2006. Principles of effective professional learning. Melbourne: Association of lndependent Schools of Victoria, AISV Research Paper: lssue 1.
  30. Chalmers, D., 2007. A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and teaching. V1.2. Canberra: Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC).
  31. Chalmers, D., et al., 2014. Australian university teaching and standards project final report. Sydney: Office for Learning and Teaching, Ref: SP12-2335.
  32. Chickering, A., W., and Gamson, Z., F., 1987. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3-7.
  33. Chickering, A. and Gamson, Z., 1991. Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  34. Chickering, A. W., and Gamson, Z. F., 1999. Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New directions for teaching and learning, 80, 75-81. doi:10.1002/tl.8006
  35. Cocharan-Smith, M. and Lytle, S., 2009. Inquiry as stance. Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
  36. Cordingley, P., 1999. Constructing and critiquing reflective practice. Educational action research, 7, 183-191. doi:10.1080/09650799900200089
  37. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., and Gardner, M., 2017. Effective teacher professional development[online].
  38. Davies, A., Fidler, D., and Gorbis, M., 2011. Future work skills 2020. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for the Future for University of Phoenix Research Institute.
  39. Davies, S., Mullan, J., and Feldman, P., 2017. Rebooting learning for the digital age: what next for 654 technology- enhanced higher education?Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.
  40. De La Harpe, B. and Mason, T., 2014. A new approach to professional learning for academics teaching in next generation learning spaces. In: K. Fraser, ed.. The future of learning and teaching in next generation learning spaces. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 219-239.
  41. Denison, N. and Zhang, S., 2010. The impact of student experiences with diversity on developing graduate attributes. Studies in higher education, 35, 529-543. doi:10.1080/03075070903222658
  42. Dewey, J., 1938. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
  43. Evans, C., Tomlinson, M., and Muijs, D., 2015. Engaged student learning. High-impact strategies to enhance student achievement. York: H.E. Academy.
  44. Evans, L., 2019. Implicit and informal professional development: what it 'looks like', how it occurs, and why we need to research it. Professional development in education, 45 (1), 3-16. doi:10.1080/19415257.2018.1441172
  45. Florida, R., et al., 2006. The university and the creative economy. Carnegie Mellon University. Available from: http:// creativeclass.com/rfcgdb/articles/University%20For%20City%20and%20Community%204.pdf
  46. Friesen, S., 2009. What did you do in schooltoday? Teaching effectiveness: a framework and rubric. Toronto: Canadian Education Association.
  47. Fullan, M. and Langworthy, M., 2014. A rich seam: how new pedagogies find deep learning. London: Pearson.
  48. Gyurko, J., et al., 2016. Why colleges and universities need to invest in quality teaching more than ever. Washington: ACE. Available from: http://acue.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ACUE-White-Paper1.pdf
  49. Harvey, M., Ambler, T., and Cahir, J., 2017. Spectrum approach to mentoring: an evidence-based approach to mentoring for academics working in higher education. Teacher development, 21, 160-174. doi:10.1080/ 13664530.2016.1210537
  50. Hattie, J., 2015. The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of teaching and learning in psychology, 1, 79-91. doi:10.1037/stl0000021
  51. Hénard, F. and Roseveare, D., 2012. Fostering quality teaching in higher education: policies and practices. Paris: OECD. Higher Education Academy, 2011. The UK professional standards framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education. York, UK: HEA.
  52. Hitch, D., Macfarlane, S., and Nihill, C., 2015. Inclusive pedagogy in Australian universities: A review of current policies and professional development activities. The international journal of the first-year in higher education, 6, 133-145. doi:10.5204/intjfyhe.v6i1.254
  53. Jenkins, A. and Healey, M., 2015. International perspectives on strategies to support faculty who teach students via research and inquiry. Spring ed. Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research, 31-37.
  54. Jurasaite-Harbison, E., 2009. Teachers' workplace learning within informal contexts of school cultures in the United States and Lithuania. Journal of workplace learning, 21 (4), 299-321.
  55. Kennedy, A., 2005. Models of continuing professional development: a framework for analysis. Journal of in-service education, 31, 235-250. doi:10.1080/13674580500200277
  56. Kensington-Miller, B., 2017. Surviving the first year: new academics flourishing in a multidisciplinary community of practice with peer mentoring. Professional development in education, 44 (5), 678-689. doi:10.1080/ 19415257.2017.1387867
  57. Kift, S., 2015. A decade of Transition Pedagogy: A quantum leap in conceptualising the first-year experience. Townsville: HERDSA, 51-86.
  58. Kivunja, C., 2014a. Do you want your students to be job-ready with 21st century skills? Change pedagogies: a paradigm shift from Vygotskyian social constructivism to critical thinking, problem solving and siemens' digital connectivism. International journal of higher education, 3, 81-91. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v3n3p81
  59. Kivunja, C., 2014b. Innovative pedagogies in higher education to become effective teachers of 21st century skills: unpacking the learning and innovations skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International journal of higher education, 4 (3).
  60. Knight, P., 2002. A systematic approach to professional development: learning as practice. Teaching and teacher education, 18, 229-241. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00066-X
  61. Knight, P., Tait, J., and Yorke, M., 2006. The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Studies in higher education, 31, 319-339. doi:10.1080/03075070600680786
  62. Krause, K., 2007. New perspectives on engaging first year students in learning [online]. Available from: https://www. griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/37490/FYEEngagemtGriffith2007.pdf
  63. Krause, K.-L. and Coates, H., 2008. Students' engagement in first-year university. Assessment and evaluation in higher education, 33, 493-505. doi:10.1080/02602930701698892
  64. Lave, J. and Wenger, E., 1991. Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
  65. Lawrence, J., 2005. Addressing diversity in higher education: two models for facilitating student engagement and mastery, in Higher education in a changing world. In: Proceedings of the 28th HERDSA Annual Conference, 3-6 July 2005, Sydney, 243p.
  66. Lawrence, J., et al., 2016. A framework for first-year curriculum design and pedagogy: intersecting the Threshold Learning Outcomes, disciplinary knowledge and the first-year pedagogy principles. Students Transitions Achievement Retention and Success (STARS) Perth: STARS.
  67. Leask, B. and Carroll, J., 2013. Learning and teaching across cultures: good practice principles and quick guides. Melbourne: International Education Association of Australia. Available from: https://www.ieaa.org.au/docu ments/item/397
  68. Loucks-Horsley, S., et al., 1998. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  69. MacPhail, A., et al., 2018. The professional development of higher educationbased teacher educators: needs and realities. Professional development in education. doi:10.1080/19415257.2018.1529610
  70. MarlandP. 2007. Learning to teach: a primer for pre-service teachers. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education.
  71. Mcaleese, M., 2014. Report to the European Commission on improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe's higher education institutions. Belgium: E. Publications.
  72. Mithyane, G. and Habedi, D., 2018. The experiences of nurse educators in implementing evidence based practice in teaching and learning. Health SA gesondheid, 23, 1-9.
  73. Moon, J., 2004. A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. London: Routledge Falmer.
  74. Nelson, K., et al., 2014. Transition pedagogy handbook: a good practice guide for policy and practice in the first-year experience at QUT. 2nded. Brisbain: QUT.
  75. Olson, M., 2000. Linking personal and professional knowledge of teaching practice through narrative inquiry. The teacher educator, 35(4),109-127. doi:10.1080/08878730009555241
  76. Olson, M., and Craig, C., 2001. Opportunities and challenges in the development of teachers' knowledge: the development of narrative authority through knowledge communities. Teaching and teacher education, 17, 667- 684. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00023-3
  77. Pegg, A., et al., 2012. Pedagogy for Employability. York: Higher Education Academy.
  78. Raghunath, R., Anker, C., and Nortcliffe, A., 2016. Are academics ready for smart learning? British journal of educational technology, 49, 182-197. doi:10.1111/bjet.12532
  79. Ryan, J., 2012. Cross-cultural teaching and learning for home and international students: internationalisation of pedagogy and curriculum in higher education. Abingdon: Routledge.
  80. Saroyan, A. and Trigwell, K., 2015. Higher education teachers' professional learning: process and outcome. Studies in educational evaluation, 46, 92-101. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.03.008
  81. Scott, C.L., 2015. The future of learning 3: what kind of pedagogies for 21st century? Education research and foresight: working papers. UNESCO, 1-21.
  82. TEQSA, 2017. Guidance note 1.3 -staffing, learning resources and educational support. Sydney: A. Higher Education (ed.), 1-7.
  83. Thomas, G., 2002. Theory's spell -on qualitative inquiry and educational research. British educational research journal, 28, 419-434. doi:10.1080/01411920220137476
  84. Tinto, V., 2009. Taking student retention seriously: rethinking the first-year of university. FYE curriculum design symposium. Brisbain, 1-8.
  85. Trautwein, C., Nückles, M., and Merkt, M., 2015. Complex dynamics in academics' developmental processes in teaching. Higher education research & development, 34 (3), 641-657. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.973376
  86. Trinder, L. and Reynolds, S., 2000. Evidence-based practice: a critical appraisal. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.
  87. Van Schalkwyk, S., et al., 2015. Reflections on professional learning: choices, context and culture. Studies in educational evaluation, 46, 4-10. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.03.002
  88. Van Waes, S., et al., 2015. Know-who? Linking faculty's networks to stages of instructional development. Higher education, 70, 807-826. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9868-8
  89. Vesico, V., Ross, D., and Adams, A., 2007. A review of the research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teacher education, 24, 80-91. doi:10.1016/ j.tate.2007.01.004
  90. Warren-Little, J., 1993. Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 15, 129-151.
  91. Williams, D. and Coles, L., 2007. Evidence-based practice in teaching: an information perspective. Journal of documentation, 63, 812-835. doi:10.1108/00220410710836376
  92. Yair, G., 2008. Can we administer the scholarship of teaching? Lessons from outstanding professors in higher education. Higher education, 55, 447-459. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9066-4
  93. Yorke, M. and Longden, B., 2008. The first-year experience of higher education in the UK. York, UK: HEA.
  94. Zuber-Skerritt, O., Fletcher, M., and Kearney, J., 2015. Professional learning in higher education and communities: towards a new vision for action research. New York: Palgrave.
  95. Zukas, M. and Malcolm, J., 2017. Learning academic work practices in discipline, department and university. Journal of workplace learning, 29, 512-523. doi:10.1108/JWL-04-2016-0025