Time to Re-engage with Kosovo and Serbia: Strengthening EU Foreign and Security Policy amidst Internal Contestation (original) (raw)

The Potential and Limits of the European Union as a Mediator in the Dialogue Between Serbia and Kosovo*

Rome, IAI, March 2022, 23 p. (IAI Papers ; 22|03), ISBN 978-88-9368-240-4, 2022

The dispute between Serbia and Kosovo over the status of the latter has the potential to destabilise other European states, including EU member states, which have unresolved ethnic, national minority or religious issues. The European Union has been acting as a facilitator of dialogue between Serbia and Kosovo since 2011. Both countries have a European perspective. Serbia is a candidate country while Kosovo is still a potential candidate for EU membership. The EU has made use of political, legal and financial instruments to shape its relations with the parties and has relied on the principle of conditionality, linking progress in the association and accession process with progress in the dialogue on normalisation of relations between the two. However, this strategy has shown certain limits. The EU’s contribution as a facilitator of dialogue has been affected by internal divisions among the EU member states over the recognition of Kosovo’s independence and by differences between EU institutions on the status of this country.

Kosovo’s European Road and the EU Role in Improving Relations with Serbia

Urban Studies and Public Administration

Compared to other Western Balkan countries, the Kosovo case is of particular importance, on the one hand, by the fact that it is the youngest state in the region and, on the other hand, the integration of Western Balkan countries could not be sustained without resolution of Kosovo’s status.This paper aims to analyze the progress made in the relations between the two countries. The normalization of relations between Kosovo and Serbia is an important factor in regional co-operation, as well as an important condition for stabilizing the Balkans.To make possible the realization of this objective Kosovo has undertaken a number of initiatives, which could facilitate the process of European integration. National Strategy for European Integration aims at supporting Kosovo’s aspirations for membership and EU integration, so that by 2020 Kosovo may have “completed its homework” for EU integration.Following the declaration of independence, Kosovo’s main objective is Euro-Atlantic integration. ...

THE CONFLICT IN KOSOVO and the EUROPEAN UNION

As we all know, after the dissolution of Yugoslavia there have been many unfortunate crises emerged in the 90s. Kosovo is one of them which ended up with NATO's humanitarian intervention to stabilize the region. However, NATO itself was not the only entity which claimed its concerns about such conflicts. EU as a significant regional organization also had that intention to find a solution for the war in Kosovo. In this paper, it is explained that EU's reactions and policies toward the crisis with its both successes and failures.

EU-mediated Kosovo-Serbia dialogue: A new attempt or resumption with the old approach

2020

This paper aims to analyze the process of mediation of the dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia by the EU, through the common foreign and security policy, highlighting the advantages and limitations of the approach used by the EU High Representatives. First of all, understanding the competencies of the High Representative, according to the Lisbon Treaty on which the legacy analysis of the two mandates of the EU ‘foreign ministers’ in the various stages of this process is built, the limits of mediation approach from the EU, where the role of the member states is addressed, especially the role of Germany and France. The paper also addresses EU cooperation with the US as part of the process, highlighting recent developments around the US approach. Based on the analysis, the paper provides a series of recommendations for the current stage when the EU has already appointed a special envoy for the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue and other Western Balkan issues, underlining the need for greater support for this process by the member states, the clearer positioning of the EU within the process that goes beyond the neutral role and the provider of the ‘goodwill table’ but that in reality connects the process with the provision of Kosovo’s European perspective. All this under the enhanced role of the US and the need for the coordination of the international factor for the further progress of the process.

Forging EU Foreign Policy Unity from Diversity: The ‘Unique Case’ of the Kosovo Status Talks'

This article explores the way in which the European Union (EU) attempted to forge a united position on the question of Kosovo over the course of the latter stages of the status process, which ran from late 2005 until the end of 2007. Following an overview of the development of EU foreign policy decision-making processes, the work analyses how these were applied in the case of Kosovo. It shows that while significant efforts were made to reach a united position on the question of recognition, these efforts eventually proved to be unsuccessful. The EU Member States ultimately agreed to the establishment of a law and order mission for Kosovo. To some, this was a success, but it cannot disguise the fact that procedural changes in the EU’s foreign policy decision-making do not cover up for diverging Member State interests and that the EU was unable to take charge of what was essentially a European issue.

The EU’s Affair with Kosovo

SpringerBriefs in population studies, 2018

In the 1990s, as part of efforts to build a new, post-Cold War identity the EU made a significant endeavour to become seriously involved in the successful management and resolution of conflicts in its close vicinity (Keukeleire and MacNaughtan 2008, 242). The turbulent region of South East Europe, and the so-called Western Balkans within it, thus seemed to be an appropriate testing ground for 'testing' the power and credibility of the EU. 1 Several studies had focused on the EU's efforts to stop war in former Yugoslav countries, showing the EU had reacted poorly to the outbreak of those conflicts (