A survey of the attitudes of chronic psychiatric patients living in the community toward their medication (original) (raw)

Perception of Depot Antipsychotics by Mental Health Professionals

Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 2003

Long acting injectable antipsychotic medications ("depot antipsychotics") were first developed in the 1960s. These agents immediately found a role in ensuring that those with persistent psychoses who had been discharged from institutions were more able to remain in the community. 1 Non-compliance with antipsychotics has been described as a "threat to the legitimisation of de-institutionalisation and functioning of community mental health policies." 2 Thus, the main role of depots has been to enhance compliance, as community-based psychiatry has become the predominant model of care for those with serious mental illness in most Western countries. Although depots are safe and effective in terms of global outcomes and may have advantages over oral drugs for preventing relapse, 3 it has been estimated that only 5% of patients with chronic schizophrenia in the United States receive depot antipsychotics. 4 In Britain, it is estimated that about 29% of patients in the community receive depots. 5 Australia has embraced the Perception of Depot Antipsychotics by Mental Health Professionals Objective: This study examines attitudes of mental health professionals about the use and usefulness of depot antipsychotic medications and determines similarities and differences in attitudes between professional groups. Methods: Mental health professionals working with patients with severe mental illness completed a questionnaire designed to evaluate their opinions concerning rate of depot use, indications for use of depots, problems with use of depots, common side effects of depots, barriers to switching from depot to oral atypical antipsychotics, impact of staffing levels on drug choice, and relative confidence in various antipsychotics for the management of chronic psychosis. Results: Overall, all professional groups perceived depot antipsychotics as a requirement for the treatment of those with serious mental illness who were poorly adherent. However, there were a number of professional differences in responses to certain items in the survey that probably reflected the degree of direct contact with patients. Medical staff were remarkably uniform in their opinions on the use and usefulness of depots. Mental health staff from all the professional groups surveyed considered extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) a major concern, while few rated cognitive side effects, sexual side effects, and weight gain as significant concerns, even though these problems are reported to be a principal concern of patients. Although all professional groups indicated an awareness of the potential toxicity of depot antipsychotics and there was an overall consensus that atypical antipsychotics are likely to be beneficial in chronic psychosis, limitations in resources were seen as a barrier to switching. Conclusions: Attitudes concerning the usefulness and rationale for use of depot antipsychotics differ by medical profession. Nursing and allied health workers are more likely than medical staff to note patient specific variables such as weight gain, injection site reactions, and patient preferences as problems with depots. The results also suggest that, in a community-based psychiatric care system, the use of newer and potentially better agents for the management of psychosis is impaired by resource limitations in service delivery as well as by educational disparities between the professions.

Attitudes towards long-acting depot antipsychotics: a survey of patients, relatives and psychiatrists

Psychiatry research, 2010

In many countries fewer than 20% of individuals with schizophrenia receive depot antipsychotic medication. Frequently stated reasons are psychiatrist's, patient's and relative's objections to depot treatment. This is the first study that directly compares the attitudes to depot antipsychotics of psychiatrists, patients and relatives. A semi-structured questionnaire about their attitudes towards depot antipsychotics was completed by 255 participants (83 patients diagnosed with schizophrenic disorder, 81 psychiatrists in private practice and 91 relatives, not directly related to the patients). Patients were more negative towards depot injections than psychiatrists and relatives. They particularly fear to be constricted in their autonomy when treated with depot antipsychotics and that injections might be painful. About 67% of all patients in our sample did not receive information about depot antipsychotics from their psychiatrist. Less than 10% of psychiatrists offer depot ...

Adherence to depot versus oral antipsychotic medication in schizophrenic patients during the long-term therapy

Vojnosanitetski pregled, 2013

Background/Aim. There is a high rate of schizophrenic patients who do not adhere to their prescribed therapy, despite the implementation of antipsychotic long-acting injections and the introduction of atypical antipsychotics. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in sociodemographic, clinical and medication adherence variables between the two groups of schizophrenic patients on maintenance therapy with depot antipsychotic fluphenazine decanoate and oral antipsychotics only as well as a correlation between the medication adherence and other examined variables. Methods. A total of 56 patients of both genders, aged < 60 years, with the diagnosis of schizophrenia (F20) (ICD-10, 1992) clinically stable for at least 6 months were introduced in this cross-sectional study. The patients from the depot group (n = 19) were on classical depot antipsychotic fluphenazine decanoate administering intramuscularly every 4 weeks (with or without oral antipsychotic augmentation) a...

Treatment patterns and clinical characteristics prior to initiating depot typical antipsychotics for nonadherent schizophrenia patients

BMC Psychiatry, 2009

Background: Nonadherence with antipsychotic medication is an important clinical and economic problem in the treatment of schizophrenia. This study identified treatment patterns and clinical characteristics that immediately precede the initiation of depot typical antipsychotics in the usual treatment of schizophrenia patients with a recent history of nonadherence with oral antipsychotic regimens. Methods: Data were drawn from a large, multisite, 3-year prospective noninterventional observational study of persons treated for schizophrenia in the United States, which was conducted between 7/1997 and 9/2003. The analytical sample included patients who, in the 6 months prior to enrollment, were considered nonadherent with oral antipsychotics and were not treated with depot antipsychotics (N = 314). Patients who were subsequently initiated on typical depots during the 3-year follow-up were compared with patients who continued therapy with only oral antipsychotic agents. Group comparisons were made on patient baseline characteristics and precedent variables that were assessed 1 to 6 months prior to depot initiation. Patient assessments were made at predetermined intervals throughout the 3-year study using standard psychiatric measures, a patient-reported questionnaire, and medical record information. Results: A small proportion of patients (12.4%) who were recently nonadherent with oral antipsychotics were subsequently initiated on depot therapy during the 3-year study. Compared to patients treated with only oral antipsychotics, those subsequently initiated on a depot were significantly more likely to be hospitalized at depot initiation or the previous 30 days, to have recent involvement with the criminal justice system (arrests), recent illicit drug use, recent switching or augmentation of oral antipsychotics, and recent treatment with oral typical antipsychotics. Conclusion: Despite prior nonadherence with oral antipsychotic medication, only a small proportion of nonadherent schizophrenia patients were initiated on depot antipsychotics in this 3-year prospective study. Patients subsequently initiated on depot had a more severe treatment pattern and clinical profile immediately preceding depot initiation. This profile may have triggered the decision to initiate a depot. Findings have important clinical and economic ramifications for practitioners, policy makers, and other decision makers, highlighting the need for early identification of and tailored therapeutics for schizophrenia patients with a history of nonadherence with their recent oral antipsychotic regimens.

Attitudes towards the administration of long-acting antipsychotics: a survey of physicians and nurses

BMC Psychiatry, 2013

Background: Discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia can interrupt improvement and exacerbate the illness. Reasons for discontinuing treatment are multifactorial and include adherence, efficacy and tolerability issues. Poor adherence may be addressed through non-pharmacological approaches as well as through pharmacological ones, ie ensured delivery of medication, such as that achieved with long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. However, attitudes of healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards LAI antipsychotics may influence their prescribing decisions and may influence medication choices offered to patients. We therefore conducted a survey to investigate factors driving LAI use as well as physician and nurse attitudes to LAI antipsychotics and to different injection sites. Methods: An independent market research agency conducted the survey of HCPs across Europe. Participants were recruited by telephone and completed the survey online. Using conjoint analyses (a multivariate statistical technique analysing preferences on the basis of ranking a limited number of attributes which are presented repetitively), attitudes to oral versus LAI medication and gluteal versus deltoid injection routes were assessed.

Comparison of the effectiveness of depot antipsychotics in routine clinical practice

The Psychiatrist, 2010

Aims and methodTo compare effectiveness of long-acting injections in schizophrenia and related psychoses in Lanarkshire, Scotland, from 2002 to 2008. We retrospectively assigned Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores and examined discontinuation and hospitalisation rates.ResultsRisperidone, zuclopenthixol and flupentixol were associated with CGI improvement in 72-74% of individuals. Zuclopenthixol was associated with lower rates of discontinuation as a result of inefficacy compared with risperidone (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.11, 95% CI 0.05-0.27) and flupenthixol (HR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.05-0.39), and lower rates of hospitalisation compared with risperidone (HR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.17-0.56) and flupentixol (HR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.71). ‘Very much improved’ or ‘much improved’ on the CGI was seen in risperidone (29%), zuclopenthixol (16%) and flupentixol (37%), P<0.001.Clinical implicationsNo long-acting injection was clearly superior in all our outcome measures, supporting the continued nee...