Exploring the Metropolitan Trap: The Case of Montreal (original) (raw)
2011, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
This article analyses the normative dimension of metropolitan governance in the case of Montreal. According to the main schools of thought (the reform school, the public choice school, new regionalism and the rescaling approach), there is an ideal scale at which to achieve specific goals such as equality, efficiency, democracy and economic competitiveness. These ideologically oriented conceptions of metropolitan governance are assumed by actors and used as symbolic resources to build their own strategies, i.e. to support or contest institutional reforms-what we call the metropolitan trap. The case of Montreal, which underwent two successive institutional reforms between 2000 and 2006, provides empirical evidence for this idea. Our analysis reveals that the Government of Quebec and local elected councils of Greater Montreal are trapped by these normative conceptions, especially the old regionalisms. However, scalar strategies do not compete equally, as the institutional context legitimates specific approaches to metropolitan governance. I would like to thank the Foundation for Urban and Regional Studies for awarding me third prize in the 2008 Competition for the Best Essay on Urban and Regional Themes by Young Authors for an earlier version of this article. I am also grateful to the three IJURR reviewers whose comments were essential in improving this text.
Related papers
New State Spaces in Canada: Metropolitanization in Montreal and Toronto Compared
Urban Geography, 2007
This paper compares the transformation of metropolitan institutions in two Canadian city-regions (Toronto and Montreal). Taking Neil Brenner’s argument about new state spaces as a starting point, we discuss comparatively how governance restructuring in recently consolidated Toronto and Montreal has been part of more general changes to the architecture of governance in Canada. We look specifically at changes to the mediation channels between civil society and metropolitan institutions. A “nationally” scaled comparison, this project must take into account the specific differences between Francophone and Anglophone Canada, between the different civic traditions in Montreal and Toronto and different traditional significance attributed to the scale and nature of metropolitan governance structures and variously scaled agency in both cities. This makes our case in many ways more like an international comparison.
In search of a stable urban regime for Montreal: issues and challenges in metropolitan development
Urban Research & Practice, 2008
As with many major North American urban areas since the 1960s, Montreal has faced contextual changes that have brought to the fore the question of its development. However, because of its history and the uncertainties linked with Quebec's constitutional future, attempts to stimulate its development have required certain compromises, often with unexpected results. In order to evaluate the performance of coalitions formed with the objective of meeting the challenges associated with urban and metropolitan development, we have drawn upon the concept of urban regimes. Focusing specifically on Montreal, we ask whether it is possible to transpose urban regime analyses that consider both structural and cultural factors specific to local organized forces. Revealing though they might be, these analyses nevertheless possess certain limitations, notably the underestimation of the weight and increasing importance of players and forces occurring on a metropolitan scale. This is particularly true in the case of Montreal.
Theme and Variations: Metropolitan Governance in Canada
IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance, 2020
This paper takes stock of current practices of metropolitan governance in Canada to identify patterns of institutional and policy development. While Canada was best known in the postwar decades for innovating two-tier metropolitan local governments in Toronto, Montr al, Winnipeg, and other cities, this model no longer exists at the metropolitan scale anywhere in the country. Instead, we see five distinct models in operation, sometimes in combination with one another: the “unicity,” or single-tier municipal model; the compulsory regional intergovernmental organization; the voluntary intermunicipal partnership; the metropolitan single-purpose body; and the provincial policy overlay. This diversity of institutional forms found across Canada reflects variation in both provincial systems of local government and geographies of urban settlement. It also points to both the flexibility of Canadian governance and policy making and the central role provincial governments play in establishing these systems.
Montreal: Merging Cultural Politics and Metropolitan/Regional Governance
Antipode, 2004
Regionalism is probably one of the most popular concepts in Canada, at least in Quebec, after sovereignty or ''distinct society''. Yet, the paradigms are certainly related. Quebec regionalism has long been contentious in relation to its demographic weight, political power, and cultural differentiation within Canada. This is the ''two solitudes'' metaphor of two cultural worlds (British and French) coexisting over time (MacLennan 1945). Regionalism in Quebec has long been concerned with the precarious balance of urban and rural regions, setting up the city/region of Montreal as the economic and cultural heart in a predominantly rural Quebec. This is the ''two Quebecs in one'' metaphor of urban and rural regional disparities in Quebec (Conseil des affaires sociales 1989). Yet, despite a strong role as a city/region, Montreal has historically experienced a weak form of metropolitan governance in which insular geography and language issues constantly confer a unique perspective to power relations between suburbs and city core. This is the ''one island, one city'' metaphor that recurrently appeared in the history of the city/region as an antidote to the historically weak regional governance, and that was very recently achieved by state-imposed legislation creating the mega-city of Montreal. 1 These three scales of regional dialectics demonstrate that urban and regional politics in Quebec are inevitably articulated around issues of identity (language) and the often correlated desire for autonomy. However, the state often finds itself in the paradoxical situation of being very protective of this autonomy and identity Ó 2004 Editorial Board of Antipode.
Regionalism from above: intergovernmental relations in Canadian metropolitan governance
Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 2022
This article surveys recent developments in Canadian metropolitan governance. Canada was admired in the postwar period for the effectiveness of its two-tier and unitary metropolitan governments; however, few survive today as urbanisation patterns have become increasingly polycentric and intergovernmental relations more conflictual. Three models have emerged in Canada, sometimes in combination with one another: the multipurpose regional intergovernmental organisation, the single-purpose metropolitan agency, and the provincial metropolitan policy overlay. Examples of each are discussed, with an emphasis on the interplay of horizontal (intermunicipal) and vertical (provincial-municipal) intergovernmental relations. Ultimately, provincial governments are by virtue of their constitutional authority and spending power the only actors capable of establishing and maintaining durable institutions and policies of metropolitan scope, and they have chosen to do so in Canada's largest and most urbanised provinces.
The Politics of Territorialization: Regionalism, Localism and Other Isms … the Case of Montreal
Journal of Urban Affairs, 2003
In a general context of state reforms, there is an emerging consensus on the strategic role of city-regions in the global economy. As it is the case in other city-regions, stateled regional reforms in Montreal are enmeshed in a series of clashes between the Left and the Right, the Provincial government and local municipalities, and the inner city and the suburbs. However, Montreal also presents an intriguing case of territorial struggles centered on cultural identities nested in multiple scales. Beyond the more recurrent arguments for and against consolidation, Montreal is also the theater of a struggle for linguistic rights. The use of territorial claims as a political strategy for influencing city-regional governance reforms and by the same token gaining more local autonomy to protect life in English in Montreal is explored as an indicator of the rescaling of claims for political autonomy.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.