Public Humanities and Publication: A Working Paper (original) (raw)
Related papers
Reframing the Public Humanities: The Tensions, Challenges & Potentials of a More Expansive Endeavor
Daedalus
This essay assesses the so-called crisis in the humanities from the vantage point of the state humanities councils, looking at the richness and increasing diversity of public humanities work happening outside the academy. The essay posits that the humanities are flourishing in a variety of public spaces, where voices outside the academy are more effectively questioning what it means to commemorate the past and build in community and meaning through that process. But even with such work thriving, the humanities face challenges. Some of those challenges are related to definitional and communications issues in and between both the academic and public sectors. Other challenges are related to access and allocation of resources. While this essay does not pretend to have “answers “ to these perennial issues, it suggests that both the academy and the public might benefit from and create more lasting and relevant impact from bridge-building that marries the expertise and knowledge from both ...
Reconnecting the humanities with the public: on how (not) to publish at European universities
Curating the European university : exposition and public debate, 2011
When academics publish, they literally make something public. But for what audience do they publish? The general public or just their peers? Recently, European policy makers have tried to make academics in the humanities more accountable to the public by imposing criteria from the natural sciences onto the humanities. In order to obtain government research funding, European humanists are now required to publish articles in Anglophone peer-reviewed journals intended for their peers abroad rather than publish books. Yet by forcing the humanities to imitate the natural sciences, policy makers are in fact doing the public a huge disservice rather than serving it. Unlike the natural sciences, where these criteria arguably generate an indirect benefit for the public or the economy in the form of inventions, patents, medicines or spin-offs, academics in the humanities on whom these criteria are imposed alienate themselves from the public. In what follows, I show why Europe borrows evaluation practices from the natural sciences and how it forces humanists to publish for their peers abroad rather than for the public. This leads, among other things, to the devaluation of local languages, a discrimination against certain disciplines, and a reduction of intellectual diversity in the European humanities. As a result, European scholars are separating themselves from the public even more than their American counterparts. I therefore propose an alternative that allows academics to reconnect with the public. While I mainly discuss the humanities, much of what I say can be applied to the qualitative social sciences as well.
Citizen Humanities as a Fusion of Digital and Public Humanities?
2020
Digital and public humanities have gained a foothold in academia, but very little is known about citizen humanities, which is referring to the engagement of the general public in scholarly research. Although the term is new, public participation in the humanities, either as the citizens’ contribution of intellectual effort or knowledge to academic research, or as the contribution of resources and tools, looks back on a long tradition. The citizen humanities range from the creation of dictionaries, the transcription and annotation of historical records to the decoding of ancient Egyptian papyri. While the digital humanities provide the citizen humanities with data, tools and techniques, the public humanities offer the means of engaging diverse publics in research activities. After embedding the citizen humanities theoretically in the responsible research and innovation paradigm, this paper will illustrate how digitisation and public involvement laid the foundations for today’s citize...
Publication practices in the Humanities
Nordic Journal of Library and Information Studies, 2021
This paper is a case study of research publication practices at the Faculty of Arts and Humanities at Linnaeus University, a young, mid-sized university in the south-east of Sweden. Research output was measured from publications in the local institutional repository following the guidelines of local research policy as defined in university documentation. The data collection comprised 3,316 metadata records of publications self-registered by authors affiliated with the faculty during the period of 2010–2018. A statistical analysis of research output was conducted, focusing on preferred publication types, disciplinary specificity, level of co-authorship, and the language of the publication as registered in the local repository. The analysis focused on two main research questions: 1) how do the local research practices stand in relation to traditional publication patterns in the humanities? 2) how do the observed publication patterns relate to local university policy on publication and...