Role of Economics in the Teaching of Land-Use Law (original) (raw)
Related papers
Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 2019
Many legal scholars have critiqued the dominant law and economics paradigm. However, important work is all too often neglected because it is not popularized in an accessible form. This Article features experts who synthesize their key insights into memorable and concise vignettes. Our 11 Things project is inspired by the work of the Cambridge economist Ha-Joon Chang, who distilled many facets of his work into a book called 23 Things They Don't Tell You About Capitalism. That book was a runaway success, translated for markets around the globe, because it challenged conventional economic reasoning with a series of short and memorable analyses and narratives that translated academic research into accessible language.
Positive, Normative and Functional Schools in Law and Economics
European Journal of Law and Economics, 2004
During its relatively short history, the law and economics movement has developed three distinct schools of thought. The first two schools of thought, often referred to as the Chicago or positive school and the Yale or normative school, developed almost concurrently. The functional school of law and economics, which developed subsequently, draws from public choice theory and the constitutional perspective of the Virginia school of economics to offer a third perspective which is neither fully positive nor fully normative. Various important methodological questions have accompanied the debate between these schools concerning the appropriate role of economic analysis in the institutional design of lawmaking and the limits of methods of evaluation of social preferences and aggregate welfare in policy analysis. These debates have contributed to the growing intellectual interest in the economic analysis of law.
Law and Economics in the Legal Academy, Or, What I Should Have Said to Discipulus
University of Toronto Law Journal, 2010
Is there a future for law and economics scholarship within the legal academy that does not involve formal modelling? To reach a positive answer to this question, I provide a brief sketch of the development of the subdiscipline, showing how, in the most recent period, the dominance of economists, working with their own agenda and career motivations, has created obstacles for the dissemination of law and economics within the legal academy and to legal policy makers more generally. I argue that drawing out and communicating to this broader readership the major insights of law and economics remain important tasks. So also, from a normative perspective, to relate efficiency analysis to whatever non-economic goals may also influence particular areas of law. Across the huge range of his publications, Michael Trebilcock has provided a model for the law and economics scholarship that I am advocating.
Crossing Lines: Integrating Law and Economics in Farmland Leasing Workshops
The Journal of Extension, 2018
Farmland leasing involves both legal decision making and economic decision making, which often are addressed through separate educational programs. In response to high demand for farmland leasing information in a period of leasing uncertainty, we integrated law and economics into a single farmland leasing curriculum. "Crossing the lines" and combining our areas of expertise yielded a comprehensive program that followed the actual farmland leasing decision-making process. Attendees of 11 Ohio Farmland Leasing Workshops reported positive knowledge change and high program value. Extension educators can apply our integrated approach to other issues that possess both legal and economic dimensions.
A view from the outside The role of cross-national learning in land-use law reform in the USA
2005
In this brief paper, I offer a few observations about American land-use law as viewed from the outside. These thoughts are based on my ongoing comparative research into planning law and practice in various countries. I hope that this comparative view might add an additional perspective to the discussion of directions for reform in American landuse law in the 21 st century. I will not comment on substantive policies, but on the legal instruments. Most of the proposals for reforming American land-use law aired in this symposium did not suggest to "reengineer" the entire framework-and rightly so 2. Had a similar debate taken place in some other (democratic) country, one would have frequently heard the phrase "a different planning system". The term "planning system" is not part of the professional vocabulary in the USA, and for good reason: The USA does not have "a planning system", where most elements that regulate the use of land are expected to link into a single over-arching concept. In the US, planning law developed through evolution, not revolution. Reforms are therefore likely to be partial, either issue-led or location-led. The cross-national transfer of planning laws 1 Professor Rachelle Alterman holds the David Azrieli Chair in Town Planning at the Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning-Technion, Israel Institute of Technology. A planner and lawyer trained in Canada and Israel, Dr. Alterman is internationally known as an authority on comparative land policy, planning law, and planning theory. She has published several books and many academic papers on these topics.
1. The case for Law and Economics: beyond disciplinary Nirvanas?
The Law and Economics movement has reached in recent years a widespread diffusion 1. As Mercuro and Medema (1997) have pointed out," Law and Economics has developed from a small and rather esoteric branch within economics and law to a substantial movement that has helped to both redefine the study of law and expose economics to the important implications of the legal environment" 2. While the standard Law and Economics approach refers typically to legal rules 3, recent developments have been concerned with a more ...
Law and Economics: Contexts and Criticisms
The purpose of this paper is trying to reach a brief understanding and overview of the law and economics methodology through exploring its history and origin, and how it was developed. Also this paper will highlight the sub fields of the law and economic methodology and how it operates. finally, it will present the criticisms of that methodology and the counter responses to such criticisms.