Effect of Luteal-Phase Support on Endometrial L-Selectin Ligand Expression after Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Ganirelix Acetate forin VitroFertilization (original) (raw)
Related papers
Impact of ovarian stimulation on mid-luteal endometrial tissue and secretion markers of receptivity
Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2008
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of ovarian stimulation for IVF on endometrial secretion and tissue markers of receptivity in the mid-luteal phase. In 10 oocyte donors, endometrial secretions and biopsies were sampled 5 days after spontaneous ovulation and oocyte retrieval in consecutive cycles. Four subjects received progesterone in the luteal phase of the stimulated cycles. Mid-luteal endometrial maturation in the stimulated cycle was compared with the spontaneous cycle, by histological dating, Ki-67, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression, secretion levels of leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), glycodelin A (GdA) and progesterone, and protein profile. No significant differences in histological markers, expression of Ki-67, PR, ER, secretion protein profiles or concentrations of LIF, GdA, or progesterone were observed when comparing natural with stimulated cycles. Progesterone supplementation of stimulated cycles was associated with significantly lower Ki-67 (P = 0.03) and ER (P = 0.04) expression compared with the non-supplemented stimulated cycle. In this pilot study, ovarian stimulation was not demonstrated to alter the studied markers of endometrial maturation in the mid-luteal phase.
Luteinizing hormone affects uterine receptivity independently of ovarian function
Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 2003
Luteinizing hormone affects uterine receptivity independently of ovarian function Jan Tesarik obtained his MD degree in 1979 and PhD in 1982. He realized the first successful gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) and the first childbirths after oocyte fertilization with round spermatids (1995) and with in-vitro cultured spermatids from a man with meiotic maturation arrest (1998). He developed an original technique for nuclear transfer in mature human oocytes (2000).
Luteal Cytoplasmic Estradiol and Progesterone Receptors in Human Endometrium
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1989
Luteal cytoplasmic estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) receptor levels were measured from the 22nd to the 25th days of the menstrual cycle in endometrial samples obtained from seven patients in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program who received no embryo replacement after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate/human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin, and from seven normally menstruating women. Serum levels of E2 , P, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and prolactin (PRL) were measured in blood samples collected at the time of biopsy. The E 2 (P < 0.01) and PRL (P < 0.001) levels were higher in stimulated than in spontaneous cycles. The level of cytoplasmic P receptor was decreased in endometrium in stimulated cycles, but cytoplasmic E2 receptor remained unchanged. These alterations in the luteal phase of cytoplasmic P receptor in the endometrium could be involved in the low rate of success following the IVF program. Fertil Steril51:976, 1989
Human Reproduction, 2005
BACKGROUND: Ovarian stimulation for IVF profoundly alters the early luteal phase endometrial development. It has been hypothesized that this process has already started in the late follicular phase, as the endometrium has already been exposed to high steroid concentrations since that phase. The aim of the present study was to prospectively investigate the effect of multi-follicular ovarian stimulation for IVF on the late follicular phase endometrium histology and the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR). METHODS: In a crossover study, 11 infertile women with normal ovulatory function, participating in an IVF programme and treated with GnRH antagonist/recombinant FSH ovarian stimulation, were enrolled in the study. Endometrial biopsies were taken in a natural cycle on the day of the onset of the surge of the LH, and in a subsequent stimulation cycle on the day of hCG administration for final oocyte maturation. Endometrial histological dating was carried out according to Noyes' criteria. Immunohistochemistry was performed, using commercially available antibodies for ER and PR endometrial expression. The immunohistochemical signal was recorded in 1000 epithelial cells in each compartment (glands and stroma). Endometrial expression for each of the two receptors was graded on a scale of 0 -3, based on the intensity of nuclear staining. Then a score range between 0 and 3000 was recorded, and expressed as a mean score per 1000 stroma or glandular cells per sample (range: 0 -3). RESULTS: Histological examination of biopsies both in natural and stimulated cycles showed no secretory changes. However, in stimulated cycles, PR expression was significantly up-regulated compared to natural cycles in both glands (1.67 versus 1.34, P < 0.05) and stroma (1.98 versus 1.62, P < 0.05), whereas ER was down-regulated in glands (1.15 versus 1.43, P < 0.05). In IVF cycles, the progesterone measurements, although within normal values (range 0.8-1.4 mg/l), were significantly higher than in natural cycles (0.99 vs 0.63 mg/l, respectively, P 5 0.008). An ongoing pregnancy rate of 37.5% was achieved in the stimulated cycles. DISCUSSION: Although the current study found no early secretory transformation in stimulated endometria before hCG administration, the ER and PR expression in these endometria is similar to the one described during the first days of the luteal phase in natural cycles. Supraphysiological concentrations of estradol and subtle progesterone rises in the late follicular phase might be responsible for this modulated steroid receptor profile. This phenomenon indicates accentuated maturation of the endometrium in IVF cycles from the pre-ovulatory phase onwards.
JBRA Assisted Reproduction
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of three different luteal phase support protocols with estrogen on the pregnancy rates and luteal phase hormone profiles of patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles. A secondary objective was to evaluate which ovarian reserve markers correlated with pregnancy rates. Methods: This retrospective observational study was carried out at a private tertiary reproductive medicine teaching and research center. The study enrolled 104 patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) on an antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). The women were divided into three groups based on the route of administration of estrogen (E2) for luteal phase support: oral (Primogyna); transdermal patches (Estradott); or transdermal gel (Oestrogel Pump). The administration of estrogen provided the equivalent to 4 mg of estradiol daily. All women received 600mg of vaginal progesterone (P) per day (Utrogestan) for luteal phase support. Blood samples were drawn on the day of hCG administration and on the day of beta hCG testing to measure E2 and P levels. Clinical pregnancy rate (PR) was the main endpoint. Results: The patients included in the three groups were comparable. No significant differences were found in implantation rates, clinical PR, miscarriage rates, multiple-pregnancy rates, E2 or P levels on the day of beta hCG measurement. Concerning ovarian reserve markers, significant correlations between testing positive for clinical pregnancy and AMH (r = 0.66, p<0.0001) and E2 levels on beta hCG measurement day (r = 0.77; p<.0001) were observed. Conclusions: No significant differences were seen in the pregnancy rates of patients submitted to IVF-ET cycles with GnRH antagonists given oral, transdermal patches, or transdermal gel E2 during the luteal phase. A correlation was found between clinical pregnancy rate and AMH and E2 levels on beta hCG testing day.
European Journal of Endocrinology, 2006
Objective: The luteal phase after ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) is insufficient. Therefore, luteal phase supplementation is routinely applied in IVF. It may be postulated that premature luteolysis after ovarian hyperstimulation is due to supraphysiological steroid levels in the early luteal phase. In the present study, high doses of steroids are administered after the LH surge in normo-ovulatory volunteers in order to investigate whether this intervention gives rise to endocrine changes and a shortening of the luteal phase. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: Forty non-smoking, normal weight women, between 18 and 37 years of age, with a regular menstrual cycle (24-35 days), received either high dosages of estradiol (E 2 ), progesterone (P), E 2 CP or no medication. Blood sampling was performed every other day from the day of the LH surge until LHC 14. Duration of the luteal phase and endocrine profiles were the main study outcomes. Results: Early luteal phase steroid concentrations achieved by exogenous administration were comparable with levels observed following ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF. No difference in the luteal phase length was observed comparing all groups. However, a significant decrease in LH levels could be observed 6 days after the mid-cycle LH surge (P!0.001) in women receiving P, resulting in accelerated decrease of inhibin A production by the corpus luteum (PZ0.001). Conclusion: The present intervention of high-dose steroid administration shortly after the LH surge failed to induce a premature luteolysis regularly in cyclic women. It seems that the induced transient suppression in LH allowed for a timely recovery of corpus luteum function. Other additional factors may be held responsible for the distinct reduction in luteal phase length observed after ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF.
Human Reproduction, 2007
BACKGROUND: There are concerns of reduced pregnancy rates with the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists (GnRH antagonists) in IVF/ICSI cycles. Sex steroids and their metabolizing enzymes in the endometrium may play a vital role in embryo implantation. This study has evaluated the levels and localization of sex-steroid receptors and metabolizing enzymes, 3b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (3bHSD) and selected 17b-HSD (17bHSD), in mid-luteal endometrium of women treated with GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) and recombinant FSH (rFSH; Gonal-F) with luteal phase progesterone supplementation. METHODS: Mid-luteal phase endometrial biopsies were obtained from oocyte donors undergoing ovarian stimulation and from control women with regular periods. Immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative-polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) were used to compare protein and mRNA expression of progesterone receptor (PR), estrogen receptor a (ERa), estrogen receptor b (ERb), androgen receptor (AR), 3bHSD1, 3bHSD2, 17bHSD2 and 17bHSD5. RESULTS: Cetrorelix-rFSH treatment caused a mid-luteal suppression of PR protein expression in the endometrial stroma, surface epithelium and glands, although expression in the glands of control samples was variable. In contrast, the treatment caused an increase in PR staining in perivascular cells. No other significant differences in protein expression were observed between the two groups. mRNA levels of AR, ERa, 3bHSD1 and 17bHSD2 were significantly reduced in the treatment group. PR mRNA levels were also reduced by GnRH antagonist -rFSH treatment, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the expression of sex-steroid receptors and metabolizing enzymes may lead to alterations in the activity and intracellular availability of estrogens, progestogens and androgens in endometrium of women treated with Cetrorelix and rFSH. Their impact on embryo implantation merits further evaluation.