Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management: A Bibliometric Analysis (original) (raw)
Related papers
Bibliometric Analysis of Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 2008-2012
2013
The present study Bibliometric analysis of Journal of Knowledge Management Practice covers the 180 articles of 21 volumes in 5 years from 2008-2012. The investigators attempted to reveal the year wise distribution of articles, authorship pattern of articles, citation pattern, country wise distribution of articles, average number of citation per articles and length of papers etc. Results showed that, in the year 2011, highest 42(23.3%) articles were published out of 180 articles in 5 years. Single author contribution has predominant with 42.7%. Average numbers of citations per article are 19. In geographical distribution of articles, USA has contributed highest 34 articles with 18.8% and highest 69.4% articles are
Two-decade bibliometric overview of publications in the Journal of Knowledge Management
J. Knowl. Manag., 2021
Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to accomplish a bibliometric analysis, investigate the underlying knowledge structure, founding and development, and evolution of the Journal of Knowledge Management (JKM) through its articles published between 1997 and 2020. Design/methodology/approach-A total of 1,346 research papers from JKM were selected and VantagePoint V R software was used to generate bubble maps, auto-correlation maps, and matrix maps through techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA) and natural language processing (NLP). The analysis gives insights about the foundation of knowledge structure, its evolution and the development of JKM. Findings-The systematic mapping of research illustrates topics emerging as new offshoots, global favourites, saturated and plateaued and reached academic maturity. The USA, the UK,
International Journal of Information, Library & Society 8 (1) 2019, 54-63, 2019
This article deals with the mapping of publication pattern of the Journal of Knowledge and Communication Management from the marked period (2011-2017) on the basis of various bibliometric patterns in which total 92 articles were published. This research articles analyse the authorship pattern, distribution of articles, most prolific contributors, authors productivity, the degree of collaboration, and found that the highest number of research results is 47, constituting (51.08%) contributed by two authors, followed by single author with 33, (35.86%) articles. India occupied first place with 91, constituting (90.09%) contributions. K.M. Shibu was the most prolific author with 5, constituting (17.85%) publications. The author productivity shows that a total of 165 authors produced 92 articles with an average of 0.55 per authors.
International Journal of Information, Library & Society 8 (1) 2019, 54-63, 2019
This article deals with the mapping of publication pattern of the Journal of Knowledge and Communication Management from the marked period (2011-2017) on the basis of various bibliometric patterns in which total 92 articles were published. This research articles analyse the authorship pattern, distribution of articles, most prolific contributors, authors productivity, the degree of collaboration, and found that the highest number of research results is 47, constituting (51.08%) contributed by two authors, followed by single author with 33, (35.86%) articles. India occupied first place with 91, constituting (90.09%) contributions. K.M. Shibu was the most prolific author with 5, constituting (17.85%) publications. The author productivity shows that a total of 165 authors produced 92 articles with an average of 0.55 per authors.
Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 2020
Knowledge Management Research and Practice (KMRP) is a reputed international journal in the field of knowledge management. Motivated by the stature of the journal, this study aims to analyse the journal's impact, prominent themes, and frequently contributing authors and their affiliated institutions and countries using bibliometric analysis. Network analysis is used to observe the trends in collaboration in the journal. Bibliographic coupling analysis grouped the journal's publications into four different groups with the objective of identifying the leading trends and the evolution of the journal. The study uses the Scopus database to extract the bibliographic data of the journal along with VOSviewer and Gephi software for graphical visualisation of the bibliographic data.
Knowledge Management Research & Practice
Knowledge Management Research and Practice (KMRP) is a reputed international journal in the field of knowledge management. Motivated by the stature of the journal, this study aims to analyse the journal's impact, prominent themes, and frequently contributing authors and their affiliated institutions and countries using bibliometric analysis. Network analysis is used to observe the trends in collaboration in the journal. Bibliographic coupling analysis grouped the journal's publications into four different groups with the objective of identifying the leading trends and the evolution of the journal. The study uses the Scopus database to extract the bibliographic data of the journal along with VOSviewer and Gephi software for graphical visualisation of the bibliographic data.
Procedia Computer Science, 2019
Understanding the knowledge and managing its assets effectively offer various advantages for organizations which lift them to the horizon of success. Since knowledge management (KM) is still regarded as an "embryonic", it is vital to find out KM patterns which would be helpful for both practitioners and academics. This descriptive study aims to offer a general review of KM literature. To do so, 637 articles published in Journal of Knowledge Management (JKM) have been analyzed based on their keywords, titles, number of citations and pages. The data obtained from Web of Science has been analyzed by Wordstat, "a" text mining software, in order to uncover the main knowledge management themes. Our results have showed that KM should be evaluated as a scientific field rather than a management fad. As also suggested in the literature, we have found a significant contribution of KM to the industry, since the "case study" appears as one of the most frequently repeated one among 3144 keywords. We have also found an unexpected result that appears significant negative correlation between the number of publications' pages, and citations. The research is expected to provide insights academics and practitioners interested in KM field.
Research Trends in Knowledge Management seen through Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis
2019
The study presents the trends of research in Knowledge Management during 2014-2018. The data has been extracted from the Web of Science database on the affiliation of basic search. The research output has been derived on the basis of 963 publications receiving 4148 citations with a 4.87 percent average citation per paper. The authorship pattern was dominated by two authors securing 35.099% and collaboration coefficient of 0.488. The country-wise publication was dominated by the United States contributing 159 papers. Out of the total 963 publications, 881(91.5%) are article which seems to top the list. The Journal of Knowledge Management seems to be the often sought journal for publishing KM articles occupying 25.54% of the total publication. However, the highly cited paper appears in MIS Quarterly authored by Kane, G.C et al. The major subject category was the application of Information Communication and Technology (ICT) in KM. Finally, the co-occurrence of keywords throws light on the research interest of the researchers.
Global Research Productivity in Knowledge Management: An Analysis of Scopus Database
Library Philosophy and Practice, 2020
The main objective of this study is to investigate and analyze global research productivity in knowledge management (KM) research published from 1960 to 2017 and indexed in Scopus database. It is the first scientometric study investigating and analyzing 56 years of KM literature indexed in Scopus. The study used scientometric approach to identify and analyze bibliographic information of 63474 documents retrieved, in August 2018, from Scopus database. KM research productivity has grown from a single digit in 1960 to four digits in 2003. The results of the study indicate that, for the past 20 years (1997-2017), KM research recorded 63141 documents compared to 333 documents in 36 years (1960-1996), and the year 2009 emerged as the most productive year. China appeared leading the world in respect to the institutional productivity and took the second position, after the USA, as the most productive country in KM research. Findings of the study showed conference proceedings leading the types of publications followed by the journals, and book series. The "Journal of Knowledge Management" leads the top 10 journals in the number of publications, while the journal of "Expert Systems with Applications" top the list in the number of citations. A total of 4134 unique contributors produced an average of 15.35 papers from 1960-2017; and the top three authors are from Australia, USA, and Norway. Findings of the study could be a useful report for knowledge workers, academic institutions, and government agencies who are interested in improving KM projects and scientific research.