Response: Commentary: Evaluating Sensory Integration/Sensory Processing Treatment: Issues and Analysis (original) (raw)

The commentary evaluates the paper by Camarata et al. on sensory integration treatments, arguing that it misrepresents evidence and improperly evaluates Ayres Sensory Integration (ASI). It emphasizes the complexity of ASI, criticizes the conflation of ASI with other sensory interventions, and calls for more focused research based on accurate interpretations and effective methodologies. The authors advocate for advancing knowledge on ASI through rigorous study designs that acknowledge its theoretical foundations.