Implications of Brexit for environmental assessment in the United Kingdom – results from a 1-day workshop at the University of Liverpool (original) (raw)

EU environmental law and policy post-Brexit: models for engagement between the EU27 and the UK

Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 2018

The UK's departure from the EU will have significant impact on the existing EU environmental protection regimes. This article examines the possible options for the new relationship between the EU27 and the UK and how the environment might be protected under this. This is done through an analysis of how environmental law is dealt with under the EU's existing relationship models with non-member states. These models are examined in conjunction with the negotiating lines that have been set down by both the UK and EU to see which is most politically feasible, and what impact it will have on how the EU protects the environment.

Brexit and environmental protection in the United Kingdom: governance, accountability and law making

Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 2018

The European Union (EU) has been a central actor in the protection of the UK environment for over four decades. Much environmental law and policy is established at the EU rather than the UK level. As the UK prepares to leave the EU, we need to consider the ways in which we shall develop domestic environmental standards and policies. Equally importantly, we need to replace the dense and extensive governance and legal framework that ensures the accountability of government for its environmental commitments. This paper explores the gaps that will arise on Brexit, and outines some possible responses. necessary element of accountability. 4 The party being required to account, for current purposes, is the government, central and local, and the agencies and bodies that deliver and advise on government policy. A number of parties may seek to hold government to account, including parliaments, environmental NGOs, businesses, citizens, and any of a range of institutions that might be established specifically for the purposes of accountability. The heavy demands that accountability makes of the various parties doing the holding to account should not be overlooked. Providing support for those accountability relationships is an important role for law, and for the governance frameworks it creates. Leaving the European Union An enormous proportion of governmental, parliamentary and civil society time and energy is currently devoted to the task of taking the UK out of the European Union. The primary constitutional mechanism for this withdrawal is the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill. The Withdrawal Bill provides for the repeal of the European Communities Act 1972, the Act of Parliament that establishes the central place of EU law in the UK's domestic system. But EU law is so deeply embedded in UK law 5 that the loss of EU law overnight by repeal of that Act would leave a gaping hole. So the Bill creates a new category of 'retained EU law', which allows for the body of existing EU law to survive in UK law on exit dayfor amendment or repeal if desired thereafter. Retained law includes secondary legislation that was passed under the European Communities Act 1972, EU rules contained in EU Regulations, which are not transposed into domestic law, but have effect in domestic law, and Court of Justice

Brexit and Environmental Law: Challenges and Opportunities

2016

The prospect of the UK leaving the European Union poses significant challenges for UK environmental law. Fundamentally, this is because environmental issues, both legal and physical, cannot be hermetically sealed within a single jurisdiction. Environmental law is an inherently multi-jurisdictional and transnational enterprise, making the EU a highly competent regulatory actor in pursuing many environmental objectives. Initially, Brexit appears to pose mainly technical challenges for UK environmental law, but these challenges reflect more fundamental normative and institutional issues. There is a complex legal task ahead in translating and disaggregating an extensive and intricate EU environmental acquis into ‘sovereign’ UK environmental law. Whilst the UK government has indicated that current EU law, including EU environmental law, will initially be ‘converted’ into domestic UK law by legal mechanisms introduced through a ‘Great Repeal Bill’, this apparently simple technical manoeuv...

Brexit and the Environment

2018

Environmental law and policy was not a prominent feature of debate or discussion during the Brexit referendum campaign of 2016. Nor has it been a significant feature of the post referendum discourse on the future of the UK’s relationship with the European Union (EU). However, the lack of media attention given to this aspect of the UK’s current membership of the EU belies the fact that the EU’s environmental acquis has had an increasingly significant influence in shaping UK environmental policy since its accession in 1973. EU law and policy are key to the UK’s approach to water, air and nature conservation. Consequently, the forthcoming rupture in relations that will be a consequence of even a soft Brexit raises important questions for those concerned to at least maintain current levels of UK environmental protection post Brexit. This paper explores the potential impact of Brexit on environmental protections within the UK. To do so it will address two issues. Firstly, it will provide...

The UK in EU Environmental Policy: commonresponses to common problems. IES Policy Brief Issue 2016/10• April 2016

2016

By bundling the manifold policy expertise of the researchers of the Institute for European Studies (IES), this paper forms part of a series of analyses investigating the potential implications of a ‘Brexit’ scenario for different EU policies. All papers ask the same three questions: 1) What is the state of the EU policy in focus? 2) What is the UK’s role/interest in this policy field? 3) What are the potential implications of a ‘Brexit’ scenario at the policy-level? After Claire Dupont and Florian Trauner introduce the project, Richard Lewis sets the historical and cultural context and explains how the UK and the EU have come to such a low-point in their relations. Next, five policy fields are analysed: justice and home affairs; free movement policies; EU external representation; the (digital) single market; and environmental policy.

Brexit as critical juncture: factors for UK's environmental policy amendment

Climate Change, 2018

The United Kingdom (UK)'s political divorce of the European Union (EU),or 'Brexit' will have some implications for many policy areas because of the complex institutional web of the EU not least the fact that the EU's environmental policy is integrated into the UK's policy. Thus, disentangling and reconfiguring the UK's environmental policy seems necessary to circumvent environmental regulatory gaps. Scholars argue Brexit will provide the UK with the opportunity to amend its environmental policy not only to fill loopholes but also ensure that environmental protection is guaranteed. This paper highlights the factors that could influencethe UK's environmental policy amendment because of Brexit. Gaps in the European Union Withdrawal Bill, trade deals, economic outlook and other circumstances are pivotal.

THE IMPACT OF BREXIT ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN SCOTLAND: SOME EARLY REFLECTIONS

Edinburgh Law Review, 2018

With much of UK and Scottish environmental law presently originating in Brussels, 1 experts have long warned of the specific challenges associated with Brexit in this sector. 2 These concern the loss of the well-established and comparatively stable regulatory, enforcement and support frameworks provided by EU law. While nobody is seriously suggesting that in future the UK and Scotland will be incapable of upholding the rule of law on environmental matters, Brexit will nevertheless entail the loss of a powerful means to scrutinise and enforce environmental protection standards. Brexit is also likely to entail the loss of access to EU funding and to cooperation programmes that, for good or ill, presently are the lifeblood of UK environmental policy tools, like farm payments, conservation and research-related initiatives. Scotland has benefitted greatly from EU funds for environmental protection and the development of new low carbon technologies, like tidal energy. It also receives a disproportionately large share of EU farm payments. Ahead of Brexit, finding replacements for these means of support will be crucial. Finally, Brexit raises sensitive questions on the allocation of repatriated EU law and policy-making powers between UK and devolved administrations. When the unifying frame of EU law is removed, existing regulatory and policy differences between Scotland and the rest of the UK – on matters such as genetically modified organisms, fracking and renewable energy – are likely to increase. Such fragmentation in standards across the UK may well threaten the maintenance of present levels of environmental protection. Even more significantly, the spat on the European Union Withdrawal Bill (EUW Bill) has shown that the UK and the Scottish Governments hold rather diverging views on who should assume the regulatory competences presently exercised by the EU after Brexit. 3 Whoever is in charge of environmental affairs after Brexit, one thing is already clear. The approach envisioned in the EUW Bill could be a viable solution for some areas of * Lecturer in Environmental Law, University of Stirling. This article draws on the report A Cardesa-Salzmann and A Savaresi (eds) The Implications of Brexit

The Implications for UK Environmental Policy of a Vote to Exit the EU

The planned referendum on whether the UK should exit the European Union raises a great many questions about the UK's relationship with the European Union (EU) and of the costs and benefits of EU membership. In the field of environmental policy, perhaps more than in any other area, the EU has had an overwhelmingly positive effect. Through its EU membership the UK government has been required to put in place a host of policies with strict targets that are legally binding, and to provide regular publicly available reports upon its performance in relation to those targets. If the UK exits from the EU but remains part of the European Economic Area the huge progress made in improving the UK environment could be lost in the absence of external pressure and auditing from EU actors, particularly in the areas of habitats, birds and bathing water, whilst the UK would still be subject to a wide range of EU laws but with little influence over their content. A total withdrawal suggests a much wider erosion of environmental policy, which is perhaps the intention of the right within and without of the Conservative Party, but one which risks significant environmental damage to the UK.

The implications of Brexit for environmental law in Scotland

2016

This report maps the possible implications of Brexit for environmental protection in Scotland, identifying core questions as well as solutions that may be adopted, with the objective of initiating a conversation about this complex subject matter. The report has been prepared as a joint endeavour by a group of environmental law experts based at Scottish Universities. Each section was drafted by a lead author, with inputs from the rest of the group. The paper is meant for a broad audience and intentionally uses a non-technical writing style. The paper is divided in two sections. The first section addresses cross-cutting questions affecting environmental governance after Brexit, focusing on the main Brexit scenarios and their trade, competition, and law enforcement implications. This analysis identifies a series of common challenges for nvironmental law in Scotland after Brexit, which relate to: •Loss of scrutiny and enforcement powers associated with the operation of EU law and instit...