Monitoring the independence of the media regulatory body as an effective verification of the implementation of the AVMSD (original) (raw)
Related papers
The current “Television without frontiers” (TVWF) Directive constitutes the basic regulation of the European Community’s broadcasting policy. Adopted in 1989, the Directive provides for the free movement of television broadcasting services in the Union as it requires Member States to guarantee the freedom of reception and transmission on their territory of television programmes which originate from other Member States. Consequently, the Directive harmonized certain national programming and advertising rules. With the aim of protecting the European TV market, it also introduced broadcasting quota for European and independent works. In the light of the rapid developments in the television sector, a revision of the Directive took place in 1997. Since 2002, the Commission is engaged in a new revision process in order to modernise the rules on televised services. It has also examined the possibility to extend the scope of these rules to cover all services which have an audiovisual conten...
Journal of Information Policy, 2014
Can a uniform policy for media pluralism be adopted across the 28 Member States of the European Union through the involvement of independent regulatory authorities? According to the authors, the chances remain remote due to political and stakeholder opposition grounded in diverse structural, cultural, political, and economic interests. Based on a review of key documents from diverse sources, and case studies in Hungary and Italy, it appears that the goal of an EU-wide collaborative network of financially and politically independent audiovisual regulatory authorities, with common standards, faces significant challenges. However, the authors see hope in the increased debate on the topic, and suggest that some movement in that direction may yet be possible.
Audiovisual Policy of the European Union
Przegląd Zachodni, 2013
The article provides a provisional systematisation of EU policy on mass media. The approach of the European Communities to the issue of mass media in the last decades can be divided into several stages. In the initial period, relatively the longest one, EC bodies were denied competences to interfere in this area. The 1980s and 1990s were characterised by an attempt on the part of the EU to work out adequate and distinct strategies regarding mass media. The moment the EC bodies ‘‘gained’’ the competences to regulate the principles underlying the functioning of the media, a boisterous development of the EU me- dia law started and became especially conspicuous with the emergence of global media. Regulations on mass media initially pertained to television but then expanded onto audiovisual media services followed by a growing significance of the so-called ‘‘new media’’. EU policy deals with the media in three differ- ent contexts: firstly, in the context of competition policy and principles governing the functioning of the internal market; secondly as an element of democratic and cultural infrastructure; and thirdly, on the level of building the so-called information society. A hypothesis is put forward that the EU audiovisual policy is dominated by a two track strategy of regulating the functioning of the media.
The Anti-Circumvention Procedure in the Audiovisual Media Services Directive
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies, 2019
Recent challenges in the EU business sector also comprise the revision of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (the new text in force since December 2018), the main media policy tool of the EU which establishes the legal framework for a convergent media landscape that comprises linear, non-linear audiovisual media services and, recently, also video-sharing platforms (VSPs) and user-generated content. One of the novelties in the revised text of the AVMSD is the new set of legal provisions enshrined in Art. 4 referring to the anti-circumvention procedure, a phenomenon the European media landscape has long been familiar with (i.e. broadcasters from another Member State circumventing the stricter rules of the target Member State). The need for a more transparent and efficient regulation originated in the practical difficulties of applying (pre-revision) Art. 4 by national regulating authorities (NRAs) as in many cases providers of audiovisual media services falling under another Mem...
Monitoring media regulators’ independence. Evidence-based indicators, Hungarian experience
The regulator’s independence in terms of the guarantees to prevent any interest group from exercising excessive influence over regulator’s decisions is essential in terms of ensuring the legitimacy of implemented policies and realising the constitutional objectives of media regulations. While acknowledging the role and significance of independence, we must also consider how accountability of these institutions could and should be provided in the framework of democratic governance mechanisms, therefore we’ve explored and identified key areas of regulatory performance of media authorities, elaborated performance indicators, and have made policy and legislative proposals. To measure whether all players have an equal chance in market entry procedures, sanctioning practices and in all fields of the application of media laws, we propose to complementing the independence indicators with conclusions derived from reviewing the authority's actual work and decisions. We propose the introduction of enforceable normative criteria in EU legislation too, which could be implemented by the mechanisms and tools available for the EC, the EP and the European Court of Justice. With the introduction of our proposed policy and regulatory measures, the accountability of these institutions will be significantly enhanced and thus their existence, operation and democratic legitimacy become more justified.
Converging Regulation for Convergent Media: an overview of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive.
Journal of Information, Law and Technology, 2008
Convergence and the Internet have changed the way creative content is now watched, and forced the Television without Frontiers Directive 89/552/EC (the TWFD) to be reformed into the Audiovisual Media Services Directive 2007/65/EC (AVMSD). Historically, the key regulatory broadcasting issue was ensuring the provision of stipulated content and implementing public policy. By contrast, telecommunications regulation centered on ensuring the provision of affordable network access for consumers. However; convergence, the coming together of different technologies, which have distinct functions, to create one medium which performs each divergent function, has now intertwined these regulatory issues. The former distinct sectors of broadcasting and telecommunications have become one with regulators placing increasing weight on facilitating access to public service content across broadcasting platforms and regulating content within telecommunications platforms. This work argues that convergence has altered the broadcasting landscape almost beyond recognition, causing new market opportunities alongside downward economic pressures. Without an adequate change in how the law regulates the new resulting creative content industry, both in terms of supply and the substance of such content, further harm would also have ensued for the entire industry. Due to fears that too much regulation would be detrimental to the competitiveness of the Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) market and hinder development; some argue that the reformed Directive should not have had a wider scope to cover on-demand content. It is suggested that while having merit, this thinking ignores the extent to which convergence has changed the broadcasting environment thus, non-linear content delivery services have to be included in the AVMSD.
Boone and Bane of fully independent Audiovisual Media Regulators
The following article discusses the idea of fully independent regulatory authorities as recently postulated by the EU Commissioner for Digital Economy & Society. By taking the renewed proposal for a directive on audiovisual media services (AVMSD) as a basis, this paper is discussing potential risks of absolute independence of regulatory bodies and argues that an independent regulatory authority can only be a necessary prerequisite to safeguard media freedom. It also needs journalistic responsibility in order to sufficiently achieve and exercise freedom of speech and protect media from undesired political influence. Therefore, one should focus on self-regulatory approaches and strengthen instruments of media accountability.
VOD service providers and regulation in the European Union: an audiovisual diversity approach
International Journal of Cultural Policy, 2020
A firm step in order to impose a quota for the catalogues of video-on-demand service providers has been given by the EU through the amendment of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive in 2018. This paper aims to analyse the potential implications of this change, in relation to the way the promotion of European works has been implemented so far, since some comments can be made in light of this revision. It will be argued that more interesting than the obligation to comply with a quota, defined by the geographical origin of audiovisual works, is the idea of making VOD service providers part of every national audiovisual production and financing system via direct or indirect financial contributions. It is concluded that indirect obligations could offer a wider room for manoeuvre to better help focus public policy decisions.