Is it actually possible to measure knowledge sharing? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Evaluating knowledge sharing in research: the International Farmers' Conference organized at ICARDA
Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 2009
and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution , reselling , loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Trends in Knowledge Sharing and Assessment
2010
Product or company names used in this set are for identification purposes only. Inclusion of the names of the products or companies does not indicate a claim of ownership by IGI Global of the trademark or registered trademark. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Collaborative search and communities of interest : trends in knowledge sharing and assessment / Pascal Francq, editor. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Summary: "This book offers indepth analysis of the different forms of collaborations on the Internet presenting several dimensions including sociological, psychological, and technical perspectives"-Provided by publisher.
Theory of Sharing Knowledge: An Introduction
We do not know how the knowledge passed down a generation to the next in the classical era, but now a lot of media that can represent how it happened. This paper aims to introduce a theory for sharing knowledge can be measured.
Effective Knowledge Sharing A Guide to the Key Enablers and Inhibitors
This chapter explores the enablers and inhibitors to effective knowledge sharing practices within different contexts and fields of work. It covers the benefits of knowledge sharing and explores some of the most commonly used methods referencing the experiences within the banking and financial sector, the higher education sector, the automotive industry, and within the field of community development. Reference is also made to the experiences of knowledge sharing in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The chapter concludes by asserting that a 'one size fits all' approach to knowledge sharing and knowledge management is not feasible, but argues that there is equally strong evidence to support the view that knowledge sharing should be a key priority for all organizations in order for them to be sustainable and relevant in the longer term.
Does Knowledge Sharing Really Increase Knowledge?
Knowledge is vital resource in the organizations in this era. Knowledge sharing is one of the mechanisms used by organizations to capture, disseminate, transfer and apply knowledge usefully. This study is done to examine if the specific type of knowledge gives significant impact to knowledge sharing practices among business faculty members in the universities. A questionnaire was distributed to respondents and data gathered was analyzed using factoring analysis and logistic regression. Study shows that only explicit knowledge give significant positive impact to the sharing of knowledge among the faculty members.
Role of individual, organizational and technical factors affecting knowledge sharing
African Journal of Business Management, 2019
The main purpose of sharing knowledge is to provide the necessary ground for realization of knowledge management, and then, a transformation of organization knowledge into an effective organizational source. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of individual and organizational technical and cultural factors affecting knowledge sharing among physicians of BUMS, in 2017. This is a descriptive-analytical survey where a self-administered questionnaire is used as a research tool. The research population is constituted of 30 general practitioners, 124 specialists and sub-specialist, and 30 fellowships. Sampling is performed by proportional stratified random method. The results are analyzed SPSS software, version 19. The findings of this study indicated that, in respective order, individual factors, with mean value of 3.54, and cultural factors, with mean value of 3.47, have the highest and lowest effect on knowledge sharing of physicians of BUMS in 2017. In the meanwhile, credit gain index in the organization with mean value of 3.88, and the loss of individual power with mean value of 2.88 have the highest and the lowest impact on knowledge sharing of this group, respectively. According to the findings of this study and positive attitude of physicians of BUMS toward knowledge sharing and its role in obtaining academic authority, it is worthwhile for health and medical educators to pay more attention to this issue and ask medical informants and librarians' help to promote knowledge sharing. This article assessed the role of knowledge sharing among BUMS' physicians which is based on their viewpoints and the role of medical informants in 2017, whose data have been collected using a quantitative and descriptive-analytic method. .
A descriptive single-case study using a qualitative design method was employed to explore the knowledge sharing behaviors of medical doctors in a community hospital located in the Northeastern United States. The topic was timely given that effective collaboration and coordination among healthcare providers was recognized as a vital component of quality patient care. Thus, the purpose of this study was to better understand the communication processes and knowledge flow among doctors and other healthcare professionals to gain insight into the nature of their social interactions. Habermas' (1984) theory of communicative action provided a non-positivist approach in interpreting human interactions where the objective, subjective, and social worlds were integrated to attain intersubjective mutuality. The theory emphasized social pragmatics and rational reconstruction among individuals who engaged in dynamic interplay to co-construct their environment. Since the purpose of the study was to explore the dialogical exchange among doctors and other healthcare professionals, Habermas' (1984) theory served as an appropriate lens to interpret the findings. A qualitative design using three data collection techniques (documentation, nonparticipatory observations, and semi-structured interviews) served as the strategy of inquiry and provided triangulation. Each phase was iterative and informed subsequent phase(s) of the study. A purposeful sample was employed to recruit participants. Thirty-two of 242 doctors were targeted, 14 of the 32 participated. The results from the data analysis identified four broad themes (collaboration and coordination emphasizing evidence-based medicine, verbal and electronic communication, transparent organizational culture, and reflective learning) which led to six key findings: doctors engaged in interdisciplinary collaboration that emphasized evidence-based medicine, doctors took initiatives to clarify and corroborate data to ensure knowledge acquisition and knowledge application were interpreted and applied as intended, social conversation created personal communication channels, electronic system facilitated communication across the organization, organizational culture strongly influenced knowledge sharing behaviors, and reflective learning was perceived as vital to individual and organizational learning. The study concluded there was evidence that doctors at this community hospital collaborated with other healthcare professionals to effectively coordinate patient care. Notably, the types of actions displayed by doctors were consistent with Habermas' (1984) theory of communicative action. The study was completed over a period of six months.
Factors of Knowledge Sharing: A Literature Review
2019
Since both academia and practitioners believe that knowledge sharing has become one of the critical ingredients for any organization to have competitive edge, knowing it with its totality is highly imperative. The purpose of this paper is to provide a more inclusive insight about various factors of knowledge sharing that has so far been discussed and empirically tested. A theoretical ground is provided in the introduction to provide strong justification for certain important factors so that the reader can get better idea of the initial concepts. Then, detail literature is reviewed to get better understanding of knowledge sharing itself and the factors affecting knowledge sharing from theoretical and empirical studies. The study is conducted with the help of collecting data from search engines such as Google scholar, papers published in renowned journals, conference proceedings and books. The results show that knowledge sharing factors such as shared goals, social network, social tru...