Wage inequality and economic growth in Mexican regions (original) (raw)
Related papers
Assesment of the relationship between Inequality and Economic Growth: A panel Data Approach
2004
The relationship between income distribution and economic growth has been found to depend on several factors such as capital markets imperfections, moral hazard, indivisibility in investments, and existence of dual economic characteristics. In recent literature the importance of geography has been emphasized in defining this relationship due to it's relevance to trade and openness. The current work assesses how income inequality influences growth estimating a reduced form growth equation. Using dynamic panel data analysis for the 32 States of Mexico with both, urban personal income for grouped data and household income from national surveys, it is found that inequality and growth are positively related. When analysing different periods, two different relationships emerge: 1) a negative influence of inequality on growth in a period of low trade policies, and a positive influence in a period more open trade, when urban personal income is considered, and 2) the relationship is reversed when monetary household income is used. To complete the research, we also estimated a structural form equation taking into account the fiscal effects of inequality on growth, finding that the relationship is positive but requires improvement of the explanatory variables involved. 1 1 I would like to thank the participants of the Fourth Summer School: Polarization And Conflict /XX Summer Courses / XIII European Courses in Basque Country University, also the participants of the IESG 26 th Annual Conference: Trade Liberalisation, Growth & Poverty at the University of Wales Conference Centre, Gregynog; and the participants of I Mediterranean Summer School in Theoretical and Applied Economics: Inequality, Welfare and Redistribution at the Universitat de les Illes Balears for their invaluable comments. I would like to thank to Professor John Black for his help on language usage corrections in the first version of this paper. My sincere thanks to all academic staff at UNU-WIDER for their excellent comments, specially to Professor Tony Shorrocks for an excellent prompted and discussed in page 24. Any error in this piece of work is my own. * This paper represents one chapter of the dissertation towards a PhD in Economics "Inequality and Growth in Mexico".
Growth and inequality in the Mexican states: Regimes, thresholds, and traps
Papers in Regional Science, 2021
Using the interregional economic inequality index and the gross state product per capita for the Mexican states over the period 1940-2015, we apply regime dynamics and hierarchical cluster analysis for segmenting the sample into regimes of Mexican states with similar performance. Robust econometric models are studied showing the direction of causality between economic inequality and income per capita, and the existence of a U-shaped curve for the interdependence between economic growth vs economic inequality, and threshold levels. We additionally demonstrate the existence of inequality traps. The education literacy rate as a control variable indicates an inverted U-shaped curve.
Growth, inequality and poverty dynamics in Mexico
Latin American Economic Review, 2018
This study investigates the contribution of both growth and redistribution to poverty reduction in Mexico during the period from 1992 to 2014. Moreover, by controlling for the potential bias due to intertemporal changes in the official poverty lines and the spurious correlation bias that can occur if the same microdata are used to generate measures of growth, inequality, and poverty, this study intends to shed new light on the dynamic relationships that exist between growth, inequality and poverty in Mexico. This study thus helps validating important and hotly debated hypotheses in development economics. In the development economics literature, there is a general consensus that growth is good for the poor (Besley and Burgues 2004; Dollar and Kraay 2002) and that a reduction in inequality contributes to a decline in poverty (Bourguignon 2004; Dagdeviren
The impact of Inequality on Economic Growth: Evidence for Mexico 1895-1994
Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference
The aim of the paper is to explore the influences of initial inequality on the long run distribution of wealth. The paper presents two mathematical models that analyse the occupational choice of individuals in the presence of capital constraints and risk in entrepreneurial activities. The models show that inequality and particularly polarization hinder economic growth. The higher the initial level of polarization is, the lower the long run aggregate wealth of the economy and the higher the long run polarization will be. The models are calibrated using numerical simulations. The implications of the models are assessed empirically using data on economic growth, and income distribution in Mexico, during the period 1895-1994, as well as the "Doing Business" databases of the World Bank. Policy-wise it is found that a more egalitarian wealth distribution and less poverty can be achieved through wealth redistribution policies and by improving the business climate. This can be done by reducing the cost of setting-up firms (technology,bureaucratic and administrative costs), introducing labour-market reforms encouraging the hiring of those typically excluded such as the poor, improving the access to credit markets by reducing the costs of creating and/or registering collateral and broadening the credit bureau coverage.
Inequality, Living Standards and Growth: Two Centuries of Economic Development in Mexico
Historical wage and incomes data are informative both as normative measures of living standards, and as indicators of patterns of economic development. We show that, given limited historical data, median incomes are most appropriate for measuring welfare and inequality, while urban unskilled wages can be used to test dualist models of development. We present a new dataset including both series in Mexico from 1800 to 2015 and find that both have historically failed to keep up with aggregate growth: per worker GDP is now over eight times higher than in the nineteenth century, while unskilled urban real wages are only 2.2 times higher, and median incomes only 2.0 times. From the perspective of inequality and social welfare, our findings confirm that there is no automatic positive relationship between economic growth and rising living standards for the majority. From the perspective of development, we argue that these findings are consistent with a dual economy model incorporating Lewis...
Mexico’s inter-regional inequality: a convergent process?
Empirical Economics
Using a recently proposed Euclidian measure to quantify interregional inequality in per capita GSP (gross state product), we study the convergence among Mexican states during the 1940-2010 period. In ten cases, we find that GSP inequality diverges while the rest of the states' GSP inequality can be described as the following catching-up or lagging behind processes. For the later processes, we also find evidence of structural breaks. The shifts in the evolution of regional inequality in Mexico for various cases coincide with two distinct periods: the "Mexican Miracle" phase and the "oil/debt crisis" phase. Keywords Interregional inequality • Euclidean inequality measure • Mexico • Unit roots • Deterministic trends • Structural breaks JEL Classification O10 • O40 • R1 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (
Regional income distribution in Mexico: new long-term evidence, 1895-2010
In the last years, Economic History literature has paid close attention to the long-term changes undertaken by regional income inequality in different countries after the integration of their domestic markets. Nevertheless, this literature has mainly focused on developed economies (US and Europe). New evidence is required from peripheral economies, where economic growth has had different features, and income inequality may have been dominated by other forces and followed different trends. The aim of this paper is to analyse several dimensions of the long-term evolution of Mexican regional income inequality, from the early stages of domestic markets integration to the present (1895-2010). This analysis may be taken as basis for further explanatory analysis and may contribute to the emergence of new hypothesis to explain the long-term changes in regional inequality in peripheral economies.
Explaining regional inequality from the periphery: The mexican case, 1900-2000
2016
Economic Historians have paid close attention to the long term evolution of regional inequality. Nevertheless, so far research has largely focused on industrialised economies, neglecting to a large extent the experience of low- and middle-income countries. This paper aims to provide, using a new regional labour productivity database, evidence on the determinants of regional income inequality changes in Mexico from 1900 to the present. Different forces have driven regional inequality in each historical period. During the primary-export led-growth period of the first globalization (1900-1930) differences across regions in the intensity of structural change caused an increasing divergence. From 1930 to 1980, during the State-led Industrialisation, internal migrations contributed to a strong process of regional convergence in productivity, both in the within and the between-sector components of regional inequality. Finally, the increasing regional divergence that has taken place from 19...
The interaction of inequality and growth and the direction of causality in this relationship have been an extensively discussed topic with several questions but without clear answers both in the theoretical and empirical literature. The current paper contributes mainly into the new economic geography (NEG) literature by focusing on the member states of the European Union. The purpose of the paper is to shed light on the effect of the economic development level and speed of growth on the relationship between economic growth and regional inequality. The research hypothesis of a significant interrelation between regional inequality and economic growth is discussed based on the models of NEG. The empirical part of the paper relies on the regional data of the 27 European Union member states at the classification level NUTS 3 over the period 1996–2006. The results of the empirical analysis allow us to conclude that regional inequality has a pro-cyclical character: regional inequalit...