‘The Origins of the Indic Languages: the Indo-European model’ in Angela Marcantonio and Girish Nath Jha (eds.) Perspectives on the origin of Indian civilization, New Delhi, 259-287. (original) (raw)
Related papers
Indo-European origin: locating the ancestral homeland of the of Proto-Indo-European speakers
Voprosy Istorii, 2023
The article considers a complex of problems related to the Indo-European origin. The study made it possible to determine the place where the ancestral homeland of the Proto-Indo-European language carriers was located. The time of the origin of the Proto-Indo-European language is determined: approximately 6,000 years ago. The information obtained is in good agreement with the conclusions of independent researchers. In addition, the results indicate a correlation between genetics and languages of the Indo-Europeans, i.e., correspond to the modern global systematic assessment of genetic and linguistic coincidences.
SCIENTIFIC CULTURE, 2022
This interdisciplinary study allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BC and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had an ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroups F and K, from which stem all European haplogroups, and the haplogroup H could appear in India. Cette étude interdisciplinaire m’a permis de démontrer, sur la base de données linguistiques, génétiques, archéologiques, historiques et religieuses, que les correspondances linguistiques entre le gaulois et le slave étaient liées à des migrations Néolithiques d’Inde et du Pakistan du Nord-Ouest vers l’Iran, la Mésopotamie, l’Anatolie, le Caucase, le Nord de la Mer Noire, l’Europe danubienne et balkanique, la Gaule et l’Ibérie, où les agriculteurs néolithiques ont contribué à former la civilisation mégalithique qui s’est développée en Gaule à partir de -5.000 et apporté une langue archaïque issue d’une langue originelle trans-eurasienne. Cela explique les correspondances linguistiques que j’ai établies entre le gaulois et les langues dravidiennes - 250 mots communs sur les 500 mots étudiés (et 160 avec le bourouchaski), ainsi qu’avec les langues altaïques, ouraliennes, karvéliennes, anatoliennes et moyen-orientales. Cela explique aussi les similitudes constatées dans l’organisation de la société et la religion, qui amènent certains chercheurs à suggérer, sur la base de la diffusion du très ancien haplogroupe H2 P-96 de l’Inde à l’Europe de l’Ouest, que les premiers Européens et les proto-Dravidiens avaient une origine commune très ancienne, les macro-haplogroupes F et K, desquels descendent tous les haplogroupes européens, et l’haplogroupe H ayant pu apparaitre en Inde.
Why Linguistics necessarily holds the key to the solution of the Indo-European Homeland question
Among the many controversies in Indian history, the most consequential one, head and shoulders above all others, pertains to the officially sanctioned Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT). This hypothesis posits a Homeland of the Indo-European (IE) language family outside India, necessitating an invasion to explain the presence of its Indo-Aryan branch inside India. In India, though so far rarely outside of it, this hypothesis is challenged by the rival Out-of-India Theory (OIT), which posits India itself as the Homeland. This is less the consequence of the enormously important and many-sided political abuses of the AIT, than of archaeological, genetical and textual findings. These prove to be unanimously in favour of India as Homeland, as well as fast accumulating in number.
The Opaque History of Indo-European Languages
This paper is about the early history of the Indo-European language family: about its probable 'Homeland', break-up, and branching. There are many different models and theories that claim to trace this process and many more variations of these models. But none of these have managed to build a respectable consensus in favor of it. The history of a language or the pattern of movements of its past speakers can be 'proved' only if we have direct evidence or clear attestation of it from the relevant period. The earliest available texts in IE languages are all from periods millennia after the breakup of its proto form. These archaic forms are mostly incomprehensible and are more mythological than historical. If there are any relevant historical content in these, we have not found the means to identify them. Thus, any theory on these processes can only be based on indirect evidence and subjective inferences.
Indo-European Languages; the Perpetual Dilemma
This paper is intended as a short preliminary draft. Hence I have not given detailed explanations on issues discussed in it or source of references. It is only intended to highlight some facts that appear to be inconsistent with the currently popular models of the origin and expansion of the language group.
Scientific Culture, 2022
This interdisciplinary study, published in Scientific Culture, journal supported by the European Academy of Sciences and Arts, allowed me to establish, on the basis of linguistic, genetic, archaeological, historical and religious data, that linguistic concordances between Gaulish and Slavic were linked with Neolithic migrations from NorthWestern India and Pakistan to Iran, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, the Caucasus, the North of the Black Sea, Danubic and Balkan Europe, Gaul and Iberia, where Neolithic farmers contributed to the formation of the megalithic civilisation which developed in Gaul from 5.000 BC and brought an archaic language stemming from a Trans-Eurasian original language. This explains the linguistic concordances I established between Gaulish and Dravidian languages-250 common words from the 500 words I studied (and 160 with Burushaski), as well as with Altaic, Uralic, Kartvelian, Anatolian and Middle-Eastern languages. This also explains similarities I have found in the organisation of the Society and religion, which lead certain researchers to suggest, on the basis of the spread of the very ancient haplogroup H2 P-96 from India to Western Europe, that first Europeans and proto-Dravidians had a very ancient common origin, as the macrohaplogroup F and the haplogroup H could appear in India.