Molecular hierarchy of mammary differentiation yields refined markers of mammary stem cells (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Emerging Picture of the Mouse Mammary Stem Cell
Stem Cell Reviews, 2007
The isolation and characterisation of mammary stem cells is an important step towards elucidating the hierarchy of epithelial cell development in the mammary gland and identifying cells that are targets of breast carcinogenesis. Mammary stem cells have recently been prospectively isolated through the identification of specific cell surface markers and in vivo transplantation into cleared fat pads. These cells were demonstrated to reconstitute an entire mammary gland comprising all mature epithelial cell types and to be capable of self-renewal on serial transplantation, thus possessing the defining features of stem cells. Notably, mouse mammary stem cells were found to share the hallmark properties of the basal subtype of breast cancer. This review will summarize the strategy used in the identification of mouse mammary stem cells and their characterisation.
Stem cells in mammary development and carcinogenesis
2005
Recently, substantial progress has been made in the identification and characterization of stem and progenitor cells in the mouse and human mammary gland. Furthermore, there is increasing evidence that a variety of neoplasms, including breast cancer, may result from transformation of normal stem and progenitor cells. Consistent with this model of carcinogenesis, a breast cancer stem cell population, with the phenotype CD24-CD44 + lineage, was recently identified utilizing flow-cytometry based cell sorting and nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice xenografts. As few as 200 cells of this cancer stem cell population were capable of generating tumors in animals, whereas the bulk of the tumor population was tumorigenic only when implanted in high numbers. Like their normal counterparts, the cancer stem cells have the ability to self-renew, driving tumorigenicity and possibly recurrence and metastasis, and have the ability to differentiate, generating the heterogeneity of the tumors. This stem cell model of carcinogenesis has important implications for understanding the basic biology of breast cancer, as well as other cancers. Furthermore, the concept of cancer as a disease of stem and progenitor cells has profound implications for the development of new strategies for cancer prevention and therapy. Index Entries: Stem cells; cancer stem cells; breast cancer.
Stem Cells in Mammary Development and Carcinogenesis: Implications for Prevention and Treatment
Stem Cell Reviews, 2005
Recently, substantial progress has been made in the identification and characterization of stem and progenitor cells in the mouse and human mammary gland. Furthermore, there is increasing evidence that a variety of neoplasms, including breast cancer, may result from transformation of normal stem and progenitor cells. Consistent with this model of carcinogenesis, a breast cancer stem cell population, with the phenotype CD24-CD44 + lineage, was recently identified utilizing flow-cytometry based cell sorting and nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice xenografts. As few as 200 cells of this cancer stem cell population were capable of generating tumors in animals, whereas the bulk of the tumor population was tumorigenic only when implanted in high numbers. Like their normal counterparts, the cancer stem cells have the ability to self-renew, driving tumorigenicity and possibly recurrence and metastasis, and have the ability to differentiate, generating the heterogeneity of the tumors. This stem cell model of carcinogenesis has important implications for understanding the basic biology of breast cancer, as well as other cancers. Furthermore, the concept of cancer as a disease of stem and progenitor cells has profound implications for the development of new strategies for cancer prevention and therapy. Index Entries: Stem cells; cancer stem cells; breast cancer.
Cell Stem Cell, 2012
Gene expression signatures relating mammary stem cell populations to breast cancers have focused on adult tissue. Here, we identify, isolate and characterize the fetal mammary stem cell (fMaSC) state since the invasive and proliferative processes of mammogenesis resemble phases of cancer progression. fMaSC frequency peaks late in embryogenesis, enabling more extensive stem cell purification than achieved with adult tissue. fMaSCs are self-renewing, multipotent, and coexpress multiple mammary lineage markers. Gene expression, transplantation, and in vitro analyses reveal putative autocrine and paracrine regulatory mechanisms including ErbB and FGF signaling pathways impinging on fMaSC growth. Expression profiles from fMaSCs and associated stroma exhibit significant similarities to basal-like and Her2 + intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. Our results reveal significant links between development and cancer and provide resources to identify new candidates for diagnosis, prognosis and therapy.
Growth and differentiation of progenitor/stem cells derived from the human mammary gland
Experimental Cell Research, 2004
Estrogen is necessary for the full development of the mammary gland and it is also involved in breast cancer development. We set out to identify and characterise progenitor/stem cells in the human mammary gland and to explore the role of estrogen in their proliferation and differentiation. Three candidate stem cell populations were isolated: double positive (DP) cells co-expressed the luminal and myoepithelial markers, EMA and CALLA, respectively, whereas double negative (DN) cells did not express these cell surface markers; side population (SP) cells were characterised by their differential ability to efflux the dye Hoechst 33342. The ABC transporter, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) was more highly expressed in SP cells than in non-SP cells and a specific BCRP inhibitor, Ko143, reduced SP formation, suggesting that BCRP confers the SP phenotype in mammary epithelial cells, as has been demonstrated in other tissues. Interestingly, SP cells were double negative for the EMA and CALLA antigens and therefore represent a separate and distinct population to DP cells. Single cell multiplex RT-PCR indicated that the SP and DN cells do not express detectable levels of ERa or ERh, suggesting that estrogen is not involved in their proliferation. DP cells expressed ERa but at a lower level than differentiated luminal cells. These findings invoke a potential strategy for the breast stem/progenitor cells to ignore the mitogenic effects of estrogen. All three cell populations generated mixed colonies containing both luminal and myoepithelial cells from a single cell and therefore represent candidate multipotent stem cells. However, DN cells predominately generated luminal colonies and exhibited a much higher cloning efficiency than differentiated luminal cells. Further characterisation of these candidate progenitor/stem cells should contribute to a better understanding of normal mammary gland development and breast tumorigenesis.
Mammary gland stem cells: More puzzles than explanations
Journal of Biosciences, 2012
Mammary gland stem cells (MaSC) have not been identified in spite of extensive research spanning over several decades. This has been primarily due to the complexity of mammary gland structure and its development, cell heterogeneity in the mammary gland and the insufficient knowledge about MaSC markers. At present, Lin-CD29 hi CD49f hi CD24 +/mod Sca-1cells of the mammary gland have been reported to be enriched with MaSCs. We suggest that the inclusion of stem cell markers like Oct4, Sox2, Nanog and the mammary gland differentiation marker BRCA-1 may further narrow down the search for MaSCs. In addition, we have discussed some of the other unresolved puzzles on the mammary gland stem cells, such as their similarities and/or differences with mammary cancer stem cells, use of milk as source of mammary stem cells and the possibility of in vitro differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells into functional mammary gland structures in this review. Nevertheless, it is the lack of identity for a MaSC that is curtailing the advances in some of the above and other related areas.