Legal Implications of Regulating the Authority of The Regional Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia (DPD RI) in Supervising Draft Regional Regulations and Regional Regulations (original) (raw)
Related papers
JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik)
The Regional Representative Council has 3 powers as regulated in Articles 22D, 23E and 23F of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, namely the powers of Legislation, Consideration and Supervision. The authority of the Regional Representative Council is expanded and added in Law No. 2 of 2018 concerning the People's Consultative Assembly, the People's Representative Council, the Regional Representative Council, and the Regional People's Representative Council, namely in Article 249 paragraph (1) letter j related to the Monitoring and evaluation of the Draft Regional Regulations and Regional Regulations. Normative juridical research method with a statutory approach. The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze constitutionally and legal problems that arise regarding the new authority of the Regional Representative Council. Based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the new authority of the Regional Representatives Council is in th...
Jurnal Politik Profetik/JPP: Jurnal Politik Profetik, 2023
This research examines the cancellation of regional regulations reviewed in the Indonesian constitutional system after the Constitutional Court decision. Through the decision of the Constitutional Court, the Constitutional Court stated "Granted the Petitioner's petition throughout the review of Article 251 paragraph (2), paragraph (3), and paragraph (8) and paragraph (4) along the phrase "cancellation of Regency/City Regional Regulations and Regent/Mayor Regulations as intended in paragraph (2) is determined by the governor's decision as a representative of Central Government Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government." The legal consequence of the Constitutional Court's decision is that the Minister of Home Affairs no longer has the authority to cancel regional regulations that violate higher regulations or at the level of implementation are considered problematic or contrary to the public interest. This research is qualitative research using normative juridical methods, or looking at applicable laws and regulations. This research uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a philosophical approach in explaining the research problems raised. The legal materials used include primary materials and secondary materials, with data collection techniques, namely inventory of legal materials using the library method, namely searching for legal texts, books, regulations, articles and essays which are analyzed in depth qualitatively and then the search results. and analysis is presented in detail. descriptive analytical-prescriptive. The conclusion of this research is regarding the annulment of regional regulations following the decision of the Constitutional Court, even though based on article 18 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, regions are given the widest possible autonomy to administer government, the person ultimately responsible is the person in charge. the administrator of the government remains the President. Thus, the role of the Central Government through the Minister of Home Affairs in supervising Regional Governments through executive reviews is deemed necessary and can be carried out preventively regarding draft Regional Regulations. This is more accurately called an executive preview, in this case an examination of draft regional regulations. This means that the Government needs to be more serious and strict in supervising or supervising the making of these Regional Regulations to perfect the draft Regional Regulations before they become Regional Regulations.
Formation of Academic Papers of Regional Regulations in the Indonesian Constitutional System
Proceedings of the 3rd Green Development International Conference (GDIC 2020), 2021
Regional Regulations have a very strategic role in the implementation of regional governance. Various efforts to improve the quality of the Regional Regulation keep continuing, including through Law Number 12 in 2011 concerning the Formation of Laws and Regulations which require the preparation of Academic Papers (AP). This study aims to identify and analyze the urgency and implementation of AP drafting in the formation of regional regulations based on legislation. The research method used was normative juridical research, by examining the prevailing norms in the preparation of a guideline in the form of a paper with a statutory and historical approach. The results showed that AP has a very important urgency to create a good and quality regional regulation. AP is very important in the process of forming laws and regulations when faced with statutory problems that are considered unresponsive, egalitarian, futuristic, and unqualified. Through AP, each Evaluation of regional regulation that gets a scientific touch can produce a higher quality Regional Regulation and can be categorized as good legislation. Given its very vital urgency, it is hoped that the drafters of Regional Regulation (Regional Government and DPRD) formulate AP first before compiling the draft and provide legal standing for AP compilers in the formation of Regional Regulation which need to be regulated in Legislation
Strengthen the Authoritative Function of the Regional Representative Councils in Legislation
Medico-Legal Update
The existence of the Regional Representative Council (DPD) in the constitutional structure in Indonesia can strengthen the parliamentary system which in turn can strengthen democracy. The substance of regional representation in the DPD is the accommodation of regional interests which is guaranteed constitutionally and elaborated with laws and regulations. This study is to analyze the reconstruction of DPD's regulatory functions in the fields of legislation, supervision and consideration. The regulation of DPD functions in the field of legislation, supervision, must be reconstructed in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia with the formulation of "legislative and oversight power exercised by the DPR and DPD" which is to replace the regulation of the DPD function in the legislative field which is limited to filing bills and participating in discussions at level I, but do not have authority for the decision making stage. Also the DPD does not have a supervisory function, because the DPD cannot follow up on the results of supervision and the follow-up to the results of supervision is a political and legal determination by the DPR (House of Representatives).
Pancasila and Law Review, 2021
The consequence of the state of the law is legislation to be an essential instrument in regulating public life. However, in some parts of Indonesia, they can make their regional regulation slightly different from the constitution, wherein this article will focus on Qanun in Aceh Province. The research used in this paper is normative law research. This research used sequential data or library data. Secondary data consists of primary law materials, secondary law materials, and tertiary law materials. The approach method used is the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. The formulation of the problem in this paper is how the standard pattern of consideration in the Law, Regional Regulations, and Qanun is based on legislation. The results show that in the Law in Consideration, Consider using the word "membentuk" or "form" because the law-making institution consists of legislative institutions and executive institutions. Regional regulation considers using...
This article describes the need for management reform of judicial review for Regional Regulation in Indonesia. After a long period of dualism in the testing system that attaches authority to the Government (i.e. the Ministry of Home Affairs) and the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court finally imposes a single review on the Supreme Court. With this new mechanism, the Supreme Court's management measures in handling judicial review cases of Regional Regulations urge improvements to ensure institutional accountability and independence.
The Review of Regulations Through Ministry of Law and Human Rights
2020
Indonesia has identified itself as the state of law (rechtsstaat). The principle of the rule of law undoubtedly underlies the life of the state and nation by embodying hierarchical legal norms culminating in constitution. However, the inconsistency between the laws and regulations is inevitable in constitutional practice thus the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court are ruled to examine legal products from the legislative and executive institutions under the mandate of the Act of 1945. Nevertheless, in the progress, Ministry of Law and Human Rights issued a policy that norm disputes under the Laws can be reviewed judicially through mediation by the Ministry. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the legality and fulfillment of the value of justice in the practice of norm dispute resolution through mediation. This study uses normative research method and is based on the theory of hierarchical relation of legal norms and the theory of concept of law. The result of the study is in sp...
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH
The mandate for law-making in Indonesia before the amendment was highly dominated by the President as if the function of the house of representative of the Republic of Indonesia (hereinafter DPR) was limited to assisting the President in the process of establishing laws. After the amendment, the authority of the legislators changed from the previous format. The President and DPR have the same authority in terms of the law-making, and even the function of the law-making is also given to the Regional Representative Council (hereinafter DPD) as a regional representative in Indonesia. The problem is that in several law-making processes, often the President and the DPR do not include those mandated by the constitution. This article will discuss the following two issues. First, who is the legislator in Indonesia according to the 1945 Constitution after the decision of the Constitutional Court? Second, how is the position of the DPD in the implementation of the legislative function after t...
IOSR Journal, 2023
In the Indonesian constitutional system, the President is given the authority to issue regulations in extraordinary circumstances called Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws (Perpu). However, the limits of this authority are quite abstract so that the phrase "a matter of compelling urgency" in the Indonesian constitution has become moot. This paper aims to analyze the basic meaning of the phrase "a matter of compelling urgency" in the Indonesian Constitution, and whether the Perpu is a regulation issued by the President as Head of State or Head of Government. The method used is normative-juridical research which is analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that the phrase "matters of compelling urgency" in the Constitutional Court Decision does not specifically explain the meaning of coercive circumstances. In addition, the establishment of a Perpu in the Indonesian constitutional system mixes the authority of the President as head of state and head of government.