E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts (original) (raw)

Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study of university students’ learning

Computers in Education, 2013

University students are increasingly choosing to purchase e-textbooks for their mobile devices as an alternative to traditional textbooks. This study examines the relationship between textbook format and 538 university students' grades and perceived learning scores. Results demonstrate that there was no difference in cognitive learning and grades between the two groups, suggesting that the electronic textbook is as effective for learning as the traditional textbook. The mean scores indicated that students who chose e-textbooks for their education courses had significantly higher perceived affective learning and psychomotor learning than students who chose to use traditional print textbooks.

Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning

Computers & Education, 2013

University students are increasingly choosing to purchase e-textbooks for their mobile devices as an alternative to traditional textbooks. This study examines the relationship between textbook format and 538 university students' grades and perceived learning scores. Results demonstrate that there was no difference in cognitive learning and grades between the two groups, suggesting that the electronic textbook is as effective for learning as the traditional textbook. The mean scores indicated that students who chose e-textbooks for their education courses had significantly higher perceived affective learning and psychomotor learning than students who chose to use traditional print textbooks.

Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning. Computers

2012

a b s t r a c t University students are increasingly choosing to purchase e-textbooks for their mobile devices as an alternative to traditional textbooks. This study examines the relationship between textbook format and 538 university students' grades and perceived learning scores. Results demonstrate that there was no difference in cognitive learning and grades between the two groups, suggesting that the electronic textbook is as effective for learning as the traditional textbook. The mean scores indicated that students who chose e-textbooks for their education courses had significantly higher perceived affective learning and psychomotor learning than students who chose to use traditional print textbooks. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Benefits and limitations of e-textbook use

2017

E-textbooks are sometimes known as e-books, digital books, or online textbooks. E-textbooks are a growing alternative to printed textbooks at many academic institutions. At a university like the University of WisconsinStout, where every student receives a laptop computer, it is important to examine how e-textbooks are accepted and how e-textbooks may affect the study habits of undergraduate students. The purpose of this research is to identify students’ preference for e-textbooks or analog, printed books, analyze the perception of student benefits and limitations of the medium, and investigate potential impacts of e-textbook use on the academic experience of UW-Stout undergraduate students.

College Students’ Usage of and Preferences for Print and Electronic Textbooks

International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)

Although print textbooks have been central for schooling for more than two centuries, electronic textbooks (e-textbooks) are steadily growing in popu-larity among students at all levels of education. This sharp growth has esca-lated the need for further research to enable a better understanding of the changing patterns of students’ usage of print and electronic media. The study explores college students’ usage of and preference for print and elec-tronic textbooks in Bahrain Teachers’ College, in Bahrain. The sample of the study consisted of 271 undergraduate students selected from courses that utilized both formats of textbook as clearly indicated in their syllabi. De-scriptive analyses were used to analyze data collected. Results indicate that regardless of textbook format, the highest percentage of students use their textbooks only when their instructors require them to do so. For print text-books, results show that the highest percentage of students spend between 1 to 3 hours a w...

e-Textbooks: A Personalized Learning Experience or a Digital Distraction?

This article explores the digital reading preferences and strategies used by preservice teachers when reading an e-textbook in a literacy methods course. The use of e-textbooks is becoming more prevalent due to an increase in access to mobile devices, acceptance of e-books in general, and the high cost of print textbooks. To ensure comprehension, teachers need an awareness of e-textbook features and the processes for effectively reading text with embedded web links, video clips, and audio files. In this study, some participants described an increase in cognitive engagement due to the ability to both utilize e-textbook features and engage with media, in addition to text. Others found the process of reading an e-textbook challenging because of distractions on their device, eye-strain, and a feeling of being overwhelmed with choices. Overall the preservice teachers expressed a preference for choice between using print, electronic format, or both.

The Textbook Dilemma: Digital or Print? Evidence from a Selected US University

TEM Journal, 2022

The increasing price of textbooks impacts students of higher education in the world. E-textbooks are becoming popular among students at all levels of education, especially at the university level. There is a shift in students reading habits and preferences towards e-textbooks. This growing trend has encouraged researchers to gather information about students' experiences, attitudes, and perceptions regarding using e-textbooks and their impact on the learning process. This study surveys undergraduate students in a small mid-western university in the USA. Data is collected from students studying four different colleges. A total of 346 questionnaires were collected. The findings revealed that 34.39% of the current users in the total sample do not want to use e-textbooks in the future. The predominant factors influencing the adoption of e-textbooks over print textbooks are cost, learning and engagement in interactive exercises, convenience, and flexibility. The study suggests some i...

E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks

2010

Previous research has demonstrated that the experience of reading e-books is not equivalent to reading textbooks. This study examines factors influencing preference for e-books as well as reported use of e-book content. Although the present student cohort is the most technologically savvy to ever enter universities, students do not prefer e-books over textbooks regardless of their gender, computer use or comfort with computers. No significant correlations existed between the number of e-books previously used and overall preference of e-books: Participants who had previously used an e-book still preferred print texts for learning. Despite the ability to easily access supplemental content through e-books via hyperlinks and other features, students were more likely to use special features in print books than in e-books.

The Effects of E‑book Reading Purposes and Screen Formats on Reading Performance and Cognitive Loads of College Students

2014

<Abstract> As e‑books have become prevalent during the past few years screen design of e‑book readers (EBRs has also become a key issue for better readability; EBR screen design should be such that it supports the reading process. The purpose of reading is important in determining a reader’s strategy for text comprehension because readers adjust their thinking process to fit the purpose. This study therefore examines the effect of EBR screen formats designed to improve readability on reading performance and cognitive loads. The results revealed that reading for entertainment demanded the least mental effort. When participants were reading for study their self‑evaluation was higher than those of other groups. One interesting result was that the response time for secondary tasks was fastest when a reader’s purpose was study using a multiple screen format EBR. Multiple screen format yielded better results by increasing mental effort and perceived ease of use. This result indicates that...