On the Need for Women’s Alliances in the Gendered Spaces of Doctoral Programmes and Academia: An Account of Challenges and Strategies (original) (raw)
Related papers
Which Role Shall I Perform? The Doctoral Experience of Women
2021
Aviva Vincent, PhD, LMSW, Case Western Reserve University Megan Webber, PhD, Case Western Reserve University Danielle Sabo, PhD Candidate, Case Western Reserve University (First published online, November 09, 2020) Doctoral women experience disparities in self-efficacy, degree completion, and mental fatigue compared to men-identified colleagues. Women pursuing doctorates express hardships mirroring those reported in the 1970s. Applied qualitative methodology yielded emergent themes, contextualized by the frameworks of role theory and academic resilience theory. The experiences shared by the women in this study support that the expectations of women regarding the doctoral process do not align with the situational reality, specifically regarding imposter syndrome, mentorship, family-planning, financial support, and social expectations. Recommendations for departments and universities are provided to create a more just experience.
This paper discusses three feminist research principles through three doctoral studies and their accompanying supervision and support group: (i) capturing women's experience; (ii) improving women's lives; and (iii) equalising power. These guiding principles assisted in understanding the connections between feminist theory and the respective studies on: older people experiencing family estrangement (Kylie); a mentoring program with women from disadvantaged backgrounds (Jennifer); and arts-based intervention research to raise awareness of domestic violence in a disadvantaged community (Leanne). It discusses the way in which these guiding principles informed the studies and the supervision process from the students' and supervisor's perspective.
Experiences of Select Women Doctoral Students: A Feminist Standpoint Theory Perspective
International Journal of Education, 2015
This mixed research study of the experiences of select women doctoral students was guided by feminist standpoint theory. Specifically, the standpoints of 8 women doctoral students were examined, with 2 men doctoral students included in the study for comparison purposes. This study involved the inclusion of participant-researchers in order to obtain emtic (i.e., both emic and etic) viewpoints. A fully mixed concurrent dominant status design was utilized. Findings revealed 4 themes which indicated that although the women doctoral students received support and encouragement to tackle the multitude of challenges that they faced, particularly in terms of balancing one's academic identity with other identities, they still felt a strong sense of remorse and guilt towards the sacrifices that they had to make in order to succeed within their doctoral programs-in contrast to the men doctoral students who, although they felt some guilt, faced their challenges more by focusing on achieving their goals and the implied results (i.e., career success) of that achievement. These findings have important implications-at least for these students-with regard to the structuring of doctoral programs.
2020
Directed by Professor Katalin Szelényi Grounded in the suggestion by Rhoten and Pfirman (2007) that the core practices of interdisciplinary research were embedded with gendered properties and thereby held the potential to offer more welcoming spaces for women's participation and advancement in scientific fields, this study investigated how women PhD students' participation in the specific context of interdisciplinary training programs influenced their educational and professional socialization. Narrative inquiry methodology guided in-depth interviews with 19 xiii CHAPTER Page 5. THE EXPERIENTIAL-EPISTEMOLOGICAL DIMENSION OF INTERDISCIPLINARY SOCIALIZATION .
The leaking pipe: Women in academia
Australian Women's History Network
Sonya Wurster explores why so many women continue to be diverted out of academia as they progress through a university career.
Gender Inequalities in Academia: Multiple Approaches to Closing the Gap
Sociologia del Lavoro, 2024
This special issue aims to contribute to the debate on gender inequalities in academia and the gender equality policies that address them. In this introduction we offer an overview of the debate and of the main research issues and theoretical perspectives, showing how a multiplicity of approaches are needed for both understanding and transforming higher education institutions. Macro, meso and micro level approaches illuminate the gendered individual, cultural and institutional factors that constrain and enable academic life, with special attention paid to how the neoliberal turn, and its organizational consequences, exacerbates gender inequalities. Women, gender, care, and intersectionality approaches allow scholars to focus on the different gendered or intersectional relationships within academia. Policy-oriented approaches allow us to analyse and assess progress in institutional efforts to close the gap on gender inequalities in academia. Actor-centred studies expose the power struggles between actors that oppose or promote gender equality policies in academia.
Gender equality in higher education and research
Journal of Gender Studies, 2022
While universities can be powerful institutions for promoting gender equality, diversity and inclusion in the higher education context and in society at large, they remain both gendered and gendering organizations. This Special Issue gathers a host of approaches that address, from a critical standpoint, the mechanisms that underpin the (re)production of gender inequalities in academia. Drawing on contrasting perspectives, such as feminist institutionalism, social constructivism, poststructuralism, matricentric feminism, feminist perspectives on care, interdisciplinary feminist epistemology, transnationalism and intersectionality, the assembled papers contribute to current academic debates and policy practice on advancing gender equality in higher education institutions and research. Using a wide range of both quantitative and qualitative methodological strategies, the original articles present, analyse and discuss several areas of intervention to be addressed by policy mechanisms such as Gender Equality Plans in the post-pandemic era.
The academia we have and the one we want: on the centrality of gender equality
This concluding essay challenges the tendency in academia to consider feminist epistemologies and gender equality as peripheral when instead they are central to the flourishing of tourism scholarship. We analyze pervasive misconceptions about gender in higher education and present an alternative way of doing academia based on dissent and critical engagement; commitment to democratic practices that allow for different points of view to be shared and accepted as trustworthy; engagement with value judgement in knowledge production; care and accountability in our ways of knowing and teaching, and the establishment of diverse career patterns and decent contractual conditions to researchers so freedom of thought can take place.