The Eu’s Voice Beyond Its Borders: The European Union’s External Communication (original) (raw)

Political communication in International settings. The case of the European Union

"This paper takes a critical perspective on the current debate on EU communication problems, and looks at past EU information and communication activities and their results in respect to citizens’ support for the EU, its institutions and its policies as well as the general attitude of Europeans towards the EU project. It aims at demonstrating that international communications of supranational organizations like the European Union are extremely challenging and traditional public diplomacy and political communication practices may not necessarily produce the desired outcomes. It concludes by suggesting a more culture-centered type of communication that takes into consideration norms, beliefs and cultural experiences of people from different countries. "

EU Communication to the Public: Exacerbating Mistrust Instead of Bringing Europeans Together

2017

Mistrust of the European Union is increasing—but why? EU officials claim it is because insufficient information is creating a gulf between EU institutions and citizens. However, we argue in this paper that citizens mistrust the EU because it has sacrificed the will of the people on the altar of governance. If this is the case, there is little point in trying to convince citizens that a union built up without them is democratic. On the other hand, if we look at the lessons from the debate on the 2005 EU referendum, and if we therefore accept that democracy is an integrative battle that demands citizens’ participation, then we can put forward a different communication policy for the EU. We refer to this new approach as institutional communication, where the aim is to produce conflict, which we consider to be a “deliberative” approach, in contrast to the “marketing” approach where the aim is to produce consent.

The Trap of Geopolitics: Rethinking EU Strategic Communication

College of Europe Policy Brief Series, 2021

As part of the European Union’s current ‘geopolitical turn’, strategic communication – combining reactive messaging and proactive narrative-building – is a key element of the EU’s response to increasing global contestation. Through its reactive component, the EU’s strategic communication is very much focussed on Russia, but still largely neglects that many other foreign and domestic actors deploy disinformation techniques, too. Through its proactive component, the EU uses narrative-building and, in so doing, resorts to aggressive ‘othering’ – disregarding the role of ‘listening’ practices in building trust and mutual understanding with third parties. Instead of focussing on Eurocentric and securitising narratives, the EU should engage with the world on an equal footing in order to communicate even more strategically. To this end, a more self-reflexive top-level political discourse should be coupled with a joined-up approach to disinformation and a greater emphasis on ‘listening’ practices.

PUBLIC COMMUNICATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. HISTORY, PERSPECTIVES AND CHALLENGES

This book is an exposé of information and communication activities developed both by the EU institutions at the European, national and local levels and by public organizations and civil society actors. Specifically this volume is a collection of papers that analyses and discusses EU information and communication policies and activities from different theoretical perspectives. It examines the EU and its different communication actions towards, with, by different publics from political and intercultural communication, journalism, public relations and public diplomacy, political science, international relations, anthropology, sociology, information technology and cultural studies. The core theme of the book is “Communicating the EU”. Throughout six thematic parts, the authors examine from different angles and reflect on what it means for the European Union to communicate in multi-national and multi-cultural settings. This volume seeks to provide relevant theoretical frameworks and the latest empirical research findings in the areas of Communication and the European Union. Our aim is, therefore, to adopt a fresh approach to analyse EU information and communication policies and actions. The special focus on empirical studies that assess tools and modes employed by the European institutions to interact with citizens, civil society, populations, and professionals is considerably significant for practitioners and students in the field to understand better EU communication framework.

THE SPECIFICS AND COMPLEXITY OF EU PUBLIC DIPLOMACY

DRUŽBOSLOVNE RAZPRAVE/Social Science Forum, 2021

The European Union (EU) is responsible for important public diplomacy programmes, including Erasmus+. Most European countries engage in activities to enhance their international image parallel to the efforts of the EU itself. By comparing the public diplomacy activities of the USA, as the founder of public diplomacy, and those of the EU, this paper aims to identify the EU's distinctive features in its image-enhancing endeavours. The paper concludes that the EU and the USA often show that they hold different values, ones that make them more attractive to foreign publics. The paper also notes the soft power held by EU member states continues to be much stronger than the effects of the EU's public diplomacy activities in boosting their image.

The public diplomacy of the European Union

Relaţii Internaţionale Plus, 2019

The article presents a study of the public diplomacy of the European Union, by highlighting its tasks, directions, priorities and means of accomplishment. Public diplomacy is a means of communicating the state's influence on international public opinion, in order to achieve certain political, diplomatic and economic goals. The authors' conclusion is that the public diplomacy of the European Union is soft power focused diplomacy, being a more effective activity in foreign policy issues than institutional activity and European security and defense policies.

EU Communication in the Member States: Comparative analysis of Finnish and Italian Communication Strategies.

The aim of this paper is to analyze the information and communication policies and strategies developed by the European Union between 2001 and 2006 and their implementation in two member states, namely, Finland and Italy, from a public relations perspective. Six EU information and communication policies are presented, and it is discussed whether or not these policies affect the communication actions of the two selected member states and how these states have implemented them. The results indicate that EU communication strategies during this period were very similar in both countries and not sufficiently tailored to their individual needs. The study is based on a content analysis of EU documents on information and communication policies, on interviews with Finnish and Italian officers in charge of EU information campaigns in the respective countries, and on some statistical data provided by different Eurobarometer surveys.