The Naturalization of Peace and War: The Hegemonic Discourses on the Political Violence in Guatemala (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Ugly Poetics of Violence in Post-Accord Guatemala
2009
With the signing of the Peace Accords in 1996 Guatemala's credentials of democratic governance were re-established, but as media reports and the international community have observed the killing and crimes of the civil war have continued. With thought of the apparent contradictions of continued violence in a time of peace, this article aims to characterise and identify the causes of this violence. The article proposes that whilst carrying some validity, current academic, media and political explanations largely fail to capture the extent and signifi cance of the violence in Guatemala because of their general tendency to disarticulate certain forms of violence from each other and their failure to collectively place these acts of violence in a wider socio-political context that stretches beyond Guatemala and between historical periods of peace and war. In underlining the importance of an interpretative approach to violence strong identifi cation is made in this article with anthropological ideas of a 'poetics of violence'. It is argued that study of the 'poetics' of violence -that is, its generative character -unravels existing statistics and highlights that its origins and solutions are to be found beyond the largely static limitations of dominant combative policies. Ultimately, explanations for the persisting violence in Guatemala do not lie with the presence of gangs and organised crime, or a pathological 'culture of violence' marked by war and by poverty, but in its support and sanction by the continued systemic violence of elites and contradictions of international intervention.
A Conflict? Genocide and Resistance in Guatemala Un Conflicto? Genocidio y Resistencia en Guatemala
#GuatemalaConference16 Sunday, September 11 th / Domingo 11 de Septiembre Arrival / Llegada Afternoon film screening 4:00 pm USC Ray Stark Theatre / Teatro: USC Ray Stark Theatre (in coop. with USC Cinema School series "Outside the Box Office") (en cooperación con la serie de la escuela de cine USC "Outside the Box Office") Monday, September 12th / Lunes 12 de Septiembre USC, Doheny Library, Library Friends Lecture Hall, room/sala 240
Counterinsurgency and Genocide in Guatemala; Reverberations of Vietnam
I argue that American military training manifested itself as a “reverberation” of the Vietnam War wherein counterinsurgency techniques honed by the United States in Southeast Asia were transferred to Guatemala and met with a similar guerilla resistance, culminating in the devastating result of the Rios Montt-era genocide. In this paper I will work through the dynamic military interventionism of the United States in Guatemala, to give historic and geographic context to the genocide of the Rios Montt era. This thesis uses the National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Books collection extensively and the English translation of the National Police Historical Archives by Kate Doyle unveiled in 2013 for a variety of primary sources. I use the Historical Truth Commission report of 1996 and the Quantitative reflection report of 1999 as a guiding source in providing context and rich firsthand accounts of the Guatemalan civil war collected from those who lived through it. Using these firsthand accounts and primary sources I tie together American military training and the atrocities that occurred in the Rios Montt Era.
Guatemala’s ‘Peace Trap’: A Bottom-Up Qualitative Study of Violence After Post- Conflict From Galtung’s Conceptual Framework, 2020
This dissertation discusses to what extent Guatemala can be considered at peace 25 years after the signing of the peace accords. My research question departs from the contrast between the official ‘at peace’ status and the reality on the ground with epidemic levels of violence and continuously forced displacement. The lack of attention from Conflict Studies to Guatemala’s violence after the post-conflict has been parallel to an intellectual takeover by ‘citizen security’ experts who have diagnosed this issue as mostly criminal. This paper takes an alternative approach and challenges the criminalisation narrative based on two factors: the continuities of violence from the war era which partly explain current violence; and the counter-productive legacies of the liberal peacebuilding model that deepened the socio-economic root causes of the problem. My thesis is that Guatemala’s ‘at peace’ status has become a trap by scholars and policy-makers because it has eclipsed a pending debate on why violence after post-conflict has endured for so long. I approach this question from a bottom-up qualitative research design based on 8 focus groups with women and young adults from a hotspot neighbourhood near Guatemala City in which participants discussed their everyday experiences with violence and expectations of peace. There were three main findings: one, the nuances of community-level violence with blurred lines between perpetrators and victims; second, the call for structural reforms such as gender equality and climate change rather than anti-crime solutions to solve local violence; and thirdly, the importance of sexism and cult to firearms as a symbolic enabler of brutality. I analysed the findings using Johan Galtung’s violence triangle of direct, indirect, and cultural violence. This paper argues that more bottom-up, multi-disciplinary studies which take a peace-based rather than a crime-based approach are needed to find new ways out to the country’s chronic violence problem.
Legacy of the Guatemalan Civil War: Breaking the memory of silence
2018
How is the postcolonial subject's identity formed, in a nation which in addition to being postcolonial also happens to be postwar. The importance in bridging both the fields of Post-colonialism and Memory studies, is crucial to further understand the identity creation processes in Latin America. The case of Guatemala, and its 36 years long raging Civil War,has provided informants that were interviewed in order to shade a light onto their truths, and further our understanding of the identity of the postcolonial subject.
The reconciliation trap: disputing genocide and the land issue in postwar Guatemala
Routledge eBooks, 2018
Guatemala's reconciliation debate is as much about the present and the future as it is about history. In order to highlight its political dimension, I propose to read this controversy through the lens of hegemony theory. It is precisely because of the entwinement of specific political economic interests, centuries-old ethnic conflict and structural racism in Guatemala that charging genocide constitutes a key moment in a fight over power-a fight in which controversies about the politics of history are also expressions of struggle over economic resources and political hegemony. In this light, reconciliation does not appear to be a solution but a trap, set by those who defend their interests against the changes that the Peace Accords and the recommendations of the Historical Clarification Commission demanded. In the first section, I show that one crucial motive for these elites to deny the Guatemalan genocide, besides obvious reasons of historical shame and responsibility, is economic issues, among them the century-old land question. In the following sections I present two seemingly contrary arguments from the political and academic left. One takes apart, from a poststructural perspective, simplifying binary logics of class and ethnic conflict and thus delegitimizes the indigenous and peasant struggle for economic reform in the process. The other proposes a form of universal guilt that also ends up depoliticizing the history of the civil war. Reconciliation as a model of rule and the recalcitrance of genocide memory Given their ubiquitous coupling in academic and political discourse, genocide and reconciliation would appear to be a tricky but inseparable conceptual pair in many transitional justice scenarios. And yet, as the controversial nature of the Ríos Montt trial and its aftermath illustrates, the political memory of genocide was unlikely to provide fertile ground for reconciliation in Guatemala. To inscribe, or not, the term of genocide permanently into Guatemala's twentieth-century history has been one of the highest stakes in the postwar negotiations about the representation of the past. And it is non-negotiable to many of the actors in this process. Therefore, if offers of reconciliation are based upon excluding this issue, then reconciliation is little more than a simplistic equation to solve antagonistic relations of power and eventually become a 'conflict in itself'. 1 This article explores how the controversies about genocide in Guatemala expose the hollowness of
An ethnographic account of the putative shift away from state-sponsored violence and the emergence of new patterns of violence in postwar Guatemala challenges liberal political and moral models that narrowly interpret violence in terms of individual suffering and/or culpability. Such models converge with a resurgence of right-wing political activity. The origins and outcomes of violence are more usefully and accurately conceived in terms of structural and societal conditions. Guatemala’s new violence (e.g., crime, gang activity, and vigilantism) is not the chaos of media accounts but a manifestation of enduring legacies of state violence and the social and economic insecurities brought on by structural adjustment policies.