A Saga of Decisive Combat of Pakistan Army in North and South Waziristan (2009-2016) (original) (raw)
Related papers
A saga of decisive combat of pakistan army in north and south waziristan
The entire security landscape of the world was altered due to the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America's World Trade Centre. After this incident, the US accused Al-Qaeda headship of the attacks. Henceforth, President Bush demanded the Afghan Taliban hand over Osama Bin Laden to the US. However, when the Taliban did not respond positively, the US attacked Afghanistan. The US also pushed Pakistan to take a U-turn on its Afghan policy; hence, President Musharraf decided to offer logistics and other relevant backing to the American forces in their operation in Afghanistan. After the defeat of the Afghan Taliban in 2002, many militants from Afghanistan came to Pakistan's tribal areas through a porous border. As Pakistan supported the US War on Terrorism (WoT), a militant insurgency was started in the tribal areas of Pakistan. This research examines the counter-terrorism strategies of the Pakistan army that it implemented from 2009 to 2016. The study explains the military operations of the Pakistan army in former FATA against hardcore terrorist groups like Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other small and affiliated radical organizations. It is analyzed that military operations namely Rah-e-Nijat and Zarb-e-Azb in former FATA with a focus on North and South Waziristan relatively remained successful.
Pakistan has regained the status of the frontline state immediately after the holocaust of 9/11 and adopted the both military and non-military based counter terrorism strategy. The paper critically examines evolution, prospects and implications of Pakistan's counter terrorism efforts and analyzes inefficacy of Pakistan's counter terrorism policies during the period 2001-2013. Pakistan has been worst terrorist hit state in the post 9/11 environment which sacrifices over 8500 military and almost 40000 civilian lives. Along with that Pakistan has to face a bounce back reaction of its military operations against the home grown and international terrorists i.e. religious extremism, insurgency, cross border infiltration, affluent terrorist attacks on military and public centers and a terrible series of suicidal attacks. Pakistan faces the after effects of its ineffective counter terrorism strategy in the context of domestic, regional and international security reservations. Although Pakistan has initiated several military operations to root out the sanctuaries of Taliban and al-Qaeda but yet could not satisfy the United States and international community due to lacking of intangible scheme plan, incident to incident counter approach, much focus on negotiation and cease fire, discrimination between bad and good Taliban, sympathetic policy towards home grown terrorist organizations, vulnerable internal security and inconclusive military operations. Pakistan direly needs substantial overhauling policy, a strong national consensus on WOT, balance in civil-military relations in the context of decision making and identification of enemy while fighting against extremism, militancy and terrorism.
Pakistan's Counter-Terrorism Strategy (2001-2014): An Analysis
Pakistan joined global efforts to curb the terrorism right after 9/11 and kept on playing vital role as a frontline ally. The country's role in War on Terror was inevitable due to multiple factors such as geography, supply routes and intelligence sharing. With the passage of time, Pakistan carried out numerous operations to dislodge trans-national militants in its tribal areas. After constant terror attacks, it aimed at launching comprehensive operations against terrorists' hiding in every nook and corner of the country. Keeping counter terror policies of Pakistan, the paper is divided in three eras. First, Musharraf era (2001-2008), in which Pakistan relied on military operations, banned extremist organizations, reformed Madrasahs and drone strikes. Whereas, the second era, under Pakistan People's Party encompasses the overwhelming reliance on Drone Warfare and military operations in Swat and South Waziristan Agency. During third era, the Prime Minister Muhammad Nawaz Sharif came up with the idea of peace talks with the militants, that went futile and operation Zarab-e-Azab was *
Global Social Sciences Review
The 9/11 was a paradigm shifting event in the international and global politics. On September 11, 2001, two jet planes hit the twin's tower in United States of America (USA). US official authorities said that it is done by alQaeda. This event also changes Pakistan's internal and foreign policies. The government of United States compel Afghan Taliban government to handover the master mind of 9/11 attack and their leader Osama bin Laden but the talks failed between the both governments. Therefore US government compel the government of Pakistan to give us Military bases and assistance against Afghan Taliban. Pakistan agreed with US as frontline ally of US in war on terror. The majority of Pakistani people were not happy with the decision, therefore, some non-state actors appeared in different part of the country especially in Malakand Division and FATA to support Taliban regime in Afghanistan. In Malakand Division Mulana Sufi Muhammad head of Tehrik Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi ...
Decline of Insurgency in Pakistan’s FATA
Asian Survey, 2019
The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan insurgency seriously challenged the Pakistani government’s writ of state in FATA from 2004 to 2008. However, by 2017, the insurgency collapsed. This paper argues that Pakistan’s counterinsurgency campaign after 2009 caused the decline of the Taliban insurgency by targeting the TTP through a true counterinsurgency operation, rather than the conventional warfare tactics used earlier. This counterinsurgency shift involved a more judicious use of force, rather than simply more force, and deployed both enemy-centric and population-centric approaches, but with a marked emphasis on the former over the latter.
2010
Abstract: Beginning in 2001, Pakistan conducted a range of operations against militant groups in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and other parts of Pakistan. Because of Pakistan's nuclear status and the presence of international terrorist organizations, such as al Qa'ida, Pakistan's counterinsurgency campaign significantly affects the security of countries across North America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East--including the United States.
Pakistan's Strategy for Counter Terrorism (2001-2014): An Analysis
Pakistan joined global efforts to curb the terrorism right after 9/11 and kept on playing vital role as a front line ally. Pakistan's role in War on Terror was desired due to many factors, mainly because of geographical location, supply routes and intelligence sharing. With the passage of time, Pakistan carried out numerous operations to dislodge transnational militants in her tribal areas. After constant terror attacks, Pakistan aimed to launch comprehensive operations against terrorists' hiding in any nook and corner within the country. Keeping historic evolution of counter terror policies of Pakistan, one may divide it in three eras. First, Musharraf era 2001-2008, in which Pakistan relied on military operations, banned extremist organizations; reformed Madrasahs and permitted drone strikes. Whereas, the second era, under Pakistan People's Party encompasses the overwhelming reliance on Drone Warfare and military operations in Swat and South Waziristan Agency. During third era, PM Nawaz (PML-N) came up with the idea of peace talks with the militants, which went futile and
Central Asia
Pakistan’s engagement in the global war on terrorism and its role as a frontline ally of the USA compelled strategic elites of the state to develop strategies to curb the militant groups that migrated to Pakistan and took shelter in the borderland areas after the U.S. military offensive Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) on Afghanistan. The aim of OEF was to hunt down the Al-Qaeda and other affiliated conglomerates enjoying patronage under the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. The real challenge before the law enforcement agencies of Pakistan was to get support from the public for military operations against these Islamist militant groups, which were the constant source of threat to the security of the state. The majority of the people in Pakistan were generally not in favor of full-fledged military operations because they saw the militants as holy warriors fighting against the infidels and believed that if Pakistan launched any brand of operation in erstwhile FATA it would be under the ...
A Critical Analysis of Terrorism and Military Operations in Malakand Division (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2017
The 9/11 was a paradigm shifting event in the international and global politics. On September 11, 2001, two jet planes hit the twin's tower in United States of America (USA). US official authorities said that it is done by al-Qaeda. This event also changes Pakistan's internal and foreign policies. The government of United States compel Afghan Taliban government to handover the master mind of 9/11 attack and their leader Osama bin Laden but the talks failed between the both governments. Therefore US government compel the government of Pakistan to give us Military bases and assistance against Afghan Taliban. Pakistan agreed with US as frontline ally of US in war on terror. The majority of Pakistani people were not happy with the decision, therefore, some non-state actors appeared in different part of the country especially in Malakand Division and FATA to support Taliban regime in Afghanistan. In Malakand Division Mulana Sufi Muhammad head of Tehrik Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi started a proper armed campaign for Afghan Taliban Support and sent thousands of people to Afghanistan support Taliban against US and their allied forces. It was a basic reason behind the emergence of terrorism in Malakand division KP but it did not played it role alone to cause terrorism in the region. Many other important factors i.e. weak political administration, unemployment, economic deprivation, socio-political instability constituted the main reason that opened room for non-state actors to consolidate their grip on the region.