SPORT'S GOVERNING BODIES SHOULD ALWAYS BE SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW: WHY (original) (raw)
Related papers
Increased monetisation of sports has necessitated greater intervention of formal regulatory instruments of the state, including review of decisions of the governing bodies by courts. But the appropriate doctrinal terrain for such judicial scrutiny has been a matter of profound controversy. This paper looks at the scope of judicial review over sporting bodies as public bodies and argues that in spite of few exceptions, most countries have favoured recognition of sporting bodies as public institutions that are subject to duties higher than those enjoined upon private persons. At the same time, courts have been cautious about equating these bodies with state and have refused to subject these bodies to the entire gamut of constitutional obligations that apply to state or its instrumentalities. Nonetheless, there is a lack of uniformity on the extent of judicial scrutiny over sports bodies with countries and courts differing on the standard and scope of scrutiny. In this regard the Indian experience of judicial review over sports regulators stands out as a particularly activist model which may substantially impinge on the autonomy of sporting bodies.
Private and Yet Public: The Schizophrenia of Modern Sports and Judicial Review
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
Increased monetisation of sports has necessitated greater intervention of formal regulatory instruments of the state, including review of decisions of the governing bodies by courts. But the appropriate doctrinal terrain for such judicial scrutiny has been a matter of profound controversy. This paper looks at the scope of judicial review over sporting bodies as public bodies and argues that in spite of few exceptions, most countries have favoured recognition of sporting bodies as public institutions that are subject to duties higher than those enjoined upon private persons. At the same time, courts have been cautious about equating these bodies with state and have refused to subject these bodies to the entire gamut of constitutional obligations that apply to state or its instrumentalities. Nonetheless, there is a lack of uniformity on the extent of judicial scrutiny over sports bodies with countries and courts differing on the standard and scope of scrutiny. In this regard the Indian experience of judicial review over sports regulators stands out as a particularly activist model which may substantially impinge on the autonomy of sporting bodies.
The features of the implementation of the sports law
Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación, 2021
Development of physical culture and sports and updating of a healthy lifestyle lead to increasing of public interest in the sports sector inevitably. It entails the creating of sport's law as a separate branch of law associated with numerous scientific researches, legal practices and professional activities of athletes, sports industry' managers and supporters of a healthy lifestyle. The article is aimed to the theoretical analysis of certain aspects of the legal regulation of sports relations that form a new branch of sports law, determining its place in the national and international legal systems. The comparative legal analysis is the leading scientific approach of this study, which allows to discover the degree of scientific development of this issue with the purpose of increasing the efficiency of legal regulation of physical education and sports. An attempt was made to present sports law as an independent branch of law, resulting from a synthesis of international and national law that regulate relations in different industries through the lenses of public and private law. The specificity of this branch of law leads to a high degree of controversy in the question of determining its features, which are properly investigated in the work. Criteria of the features of the implementation of sports law are formulated: substantive capacity, external borders with other branches of law, national characteristics and international universality.
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2014
In our social system is getting more and more ground to the role of law in general, but also sports and legal norms in particular the establishment, functioning and legitimacy of sports activities, clubs and sports federations. Seen in the context of a myriad of norms, rules and laws of our country whether, but European legal framework have given the developmental approach and institutional self-regulating principles of sports bodies as special public entity Sports which means that they are: sports subjects of law, not state, created by law in the public interest involved here (University of sport; Societies sports associations, sports clubs and federations) that whether a legal person in public stage or private have functional independence, political, economic, and executive decision to each organ. Purpose of this study in to show needs, practices and challenges to present legislation on a whole, as a package of legal-important character with sports, to identify schemes which function playgrounds, plant and sporting rights and obligations of plants administrators sports.
Sport Mont Journal, 2011
This work offers a review of law implementation in sport. It present a number of cases which should be dealt with regarding the established legal regulation for providing with law protection athletes, coaches, sports workers and sports clubs.
Sports Law and the European Union
CHOREGIA, 2007
For the last thirty years the athletic community as well as academics are dealing with an effort by the European Court of Justice to influence sport law and the rule-making power of member states in the area of sports. In the present paper the reader will find a summary of all the major cases brought before the Court as well as an analysis of their effect. Apart from that, the reader will be able to understand the fact that the Court does not accept the rule of precedent in its decisions as well as the fact that it is rather policy than Treaty provisions that controls it. It remains to see how sports authorities can use these facts to their benefit, if they want to hope for a change of the Courts' case law in the future.