Beyond Invasion and Succession: School Segregation, Real Estate Blockbusting, and the Political Economy of Neighborhood Racial Transition (original) (raw)
Recent urban scholarship has questioned the validity, methodology, and assumptions of the invasion-succession model of neighborhood racial transition but has yet to elaborate a framework that extends beyond a critique of ecological theory. In this article, I use the theoretical insights of the sociospatial approach and draw on census data, government documents and reports, in-depth interviews, and oral histories to examine the racial transition of southeast Kansas City, Missouri after 1950. I advance understanding of neighborhood transition by identifying the key actors, organized interests, and institutional forces that the invasion-succession model has neglected to incorporate into its explanatory framework. I investigate the critical links between discriminatory school boundary decisions and real estate blockbusting in determining the timing, pace, and magnitude of racial succession. My objective is to fashion an alternative theory of neighborhood racial transition that takes into account the power of events to shape and transform ecological patterns, illuminates the interconnectedness of structural factors and human agency, and highlights the role of powerful actors and organized interests in marketing racial exclusion and reinforcing racially segregated settlement spaces.
Related papers
Racial transition among neighborhoods: A simulation model incorporating institutional parameters
Journal of Urban Economics, 1978
This research was performed under a grant from the Albert Farwell Bemis Fund of M.I.T. Helpful comments were recieved from John Quigley and the referee. Charlotte Moore of the MIT-Harvard Joint Center for Urban Studies assisted with editing and production. 2 For example, the widespread occurrence of abandonment in several American cities has been at least partially attributed by many researchers to previous racial transition.
The Neighborhood Unit: Schools, Segregation, and the Shaping of the Modern Metropolitan Landscape
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 2018
Background/Context In the first half of the 20th century, American policy makers at all levels of government, alongside housing and real estate industry figures, crafted mechanisms of racial exclusion that helped to segregate metropolitan residential landscapes. Although educators and historians have recognized the long-term consequences of these policies for the making of educational segregation, they have not yet fully perceived how strongly ideas about public schools mattered in the shaping of these exclusionary practices. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study This historical study examines the “neighborhood unit” concept, its origins, and its influence, to illustrate the centrality of schooling in shaping mechanisms of racial segregation. The “neighborhood unit” concept, advocated during the 1920s by planner Clarence Perry before becoming central to local-level planning as well as federal-level housing policy, imagined self-contained communities within cities. Each ...
Neighborhood Racial and Ethnic Change: The Time Dimension in Segregation
Urban Geography, 2011
This nationwide study of neighborhood racial and ethnic transitions examines the varieties and dynamics of U.S. neighborhood change between 1990 and 2000. The authors use innovative and robust cluster analysis techniques to classify U.S. census tracts in the 50 largest metropolitan areas. We interpret the resulting clusters according to their central tendencies and explore inter-metropolitan and regional patterns in relative cluster frequencies. Finally, we estimate multilevel logistic regression models of the covariates of cluster membership. We conclude that within cities, trends toward greater and potentially stable diversity in some neighborhoods co-exist with continuing White flight and re-segregation in other local areas. Further, at both the metropolitan and neighborhood levels increasing diversity is associated with the significant presence of multiple minorities, while white flight and re-segregation are associated with the rapid growth of either blacks or Hispanics. This variability in transition outcomes can at least in part be attributed to demographic structure at the metropolitan scale and to the distance from established minority enclaves of the neighborhoods themselves.
Patterns of Neighborhood Transition in a Multiethnic World: U.S. Metropolitan Areas, 1970-1980
Demography, 1991
Ethnic diversity within metropolitan neighborhoods increased during the 1970s, and all-white tracts became less common. The simple presence of a minority group did not precipitate turnover, but as the minority proportion rose, the probability of racial and ethnic transition increased. Tracts with multiple groups became much more common during the decade and were especially prone to transition. Distinctively, black neighborhoods displayed a bipolar clustering at both ends of the distribution of minority presence. Multivariate models showed that white loss was increased by the presence of multiple minority groups, by a higher minority proportion, and by location near existing minority areas. Current U.S. fertility and immigration patterns show the increasing importance of racial and ethnic minorities in U.S. society and suggest an increase in the number of multiethnic neighborhoods. Prior empirical and theoretical work on neighborhoods has generally assumed the inevitability of racial turnover and the interaction of only two groups in space, usually blacks and whites. That assumption simplified analysis, but it no longer reflects the complex reality of urban neighborhoods composed of non-Hispanic whites, blacks, Asians, and Hispanics. In this paper we develop a multiethnic framework to explore patterns of racial and ethnic neighborhood change in large U.S. metropolitan areas between 1970 and 1980. Although the sociological study of neighborhood change began with the seminal work of Park and Burgess (1925), the first systematic study of neighborhood racial change was conducted by Duncan and Duncan (1957) in Chicago. It was followed by Taeuber and Taeuber's (1965) in-depth analysis of racial turnover in 10 major cities. Both studies suggested that racial change within neighborhoods was largely unidirectional in cities with large and growing black populations; once blacks entered a neighborhood, their proportion increased steadily until the area was predominately black. Racially mixed neighborhoods were simply those which had not completed the transition process. Other early studies, however, questioned the inevitability of turnover in racially mixed
Not In My Backyard: Landlocked by Racial Borders- Jim Crow Housing Policies in Fort Smith, Arkansas
This is a senior portfolio project requirement for completion of degree requirements for a Bachelor of Arts in History at UAFS. The research contained here is the product of two full semesters and one summer break. Nimbyism is a catchphrase used to describe the phenomenon of "white flight" in a post-civil rights era. The majority of the information gathered in this paper is the product of field research using primary source material from city, state and national sources. The arguments posed herein are a testimony of the continuing epidemic of racially engineered demography in American Cities, especially in the New South. This conclusion is that housing administrations in the modern context are the product of generations of class and racial systems built to reward subsidized housing construction in areas of urban blight and a lower functioning infrastructure, while suburban expansion and gentrification continue to promote white elitism and class separation.
Racial and spatial interaction for neighborhood dynamics in Chicago
2016
We look at the empirical validity of Schelling’s models for racial residential segregation applied to the case of Chicago. Most of the empirical literature has focused exclusively the single neighborhood model, also known as the tipping point model and neglected a multineighborhood approach or a unified approach. The multi-neighborhood approach introduced spatial interaction across the neighborhoods, in particular we look at spatial interaction across neighborhoods sharing a border. An initial exploration of the data indicates that spatial contiguity might be relevant to properly analyze the so call tipping phenomena of predominately non-Hispanic white neighborhoods to predominantly minority neighborhoods within a decade. We introduce an econometric model that combines an approach to estimate tipping point using threshold effects and a spatial autoregressive model. The estimation results from the model disputes the existence of a tipping point, that is a discontinuous change in the ...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.