Arbitrage in Energy Markets: Price Discrimination under Congestion (original) (raw)
Related papers
Arbitrage in Energy Markets: Competing in the Incumbents Shadow
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
This paper studies the welfare implications of using market mechanisms to allocate transmission capacity in recently lib eraliz ed electricity markets. It q uestions whether access to this essential facility should b e traded on a market, or whether the incumb ent should retain ex clusiv e usage rights. W e show that granting ex clusiv e use to the incumb ent might b e optimal, if the capacity of the essential facility is small and the incumb ent can reduce production costs b y taking adv antage of interregional production-cost diff erences. This result counters the intuition that arb itrage will improv e the social surplus when there is no output contraction. The reason is that when competition is imperfect, arb itrage might reduce production effi ciency. W e adv ise policy makers to introduce market mechanisms for the allocation of transmission capacity only if suffi cient inv estment in the network is ensured or if the market power of the incumb ent is b roken in at least one of the markets in which it is activ e.
Monopolistic Competition in Electricity Networks
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
We model a centralized electricity market in which generators bid prices in a sealed bid form and are dispatched by an independent system operator (ISO). The ISO allocates production to minimize the system costs while considering the transmission constraints. In a departure from received literature, the model incorporates explicit description of the network details.
Barring consumers from the electricity network might improve welfare
2002
A monopolist supplies a homogenous good to two geographically separated markets. Production costs and demand conditions are different in each market. A line with a limited transport capacity connects both markets. The paper compares two institutional frameworks: (1) exclusive access to the line is granted to the monopolist (2) access to the line is auctioned to the monopolist and consumers. It derives the monopolistGs strategy, and illustrates the result with examples. In general, it is not clearMcut which regime gives the highest total surplus.
Coupling Transmission and Energy Markets Reduces Market Power
2000
Transmission constraints fragment electricity markets and enhance regional market power of electricity generators. In continental Europe rights to access transmission between countries are auctioned to traders, which arbitrage separate energy spot markets of these countries. In Scandinavia the system operator integrates these markets and simultaneously clears energy spot markets of several countries and decides on optimal energy transmission. In any
Should an incumbent generator be allowed to buy import transmission capacity?
2003
Abstract A small region has a high cost monopolistic electricity generator. It is connected through a low capacity transmission line with a large, comM petitive low cost region. Access to the transmission line is auctioned. I show that, if consumers arbitrate on the regional price differences, the monopolist will buy the transmission capacity. It is then welfare improvM ing not to allow the monopolist to buy transmission rights.
Limits to arbitrage in electricity markets
2014
As in most commodities markets, deregulated electricity markets allow the participation of purely financial (virtual) traders to enhance informational and productive efficiency. The presence of financial players is expected, among other things, to help eliminate predictable pricing gaps between forward and spot prices, which may arise in the presence of market power and are linked to productive inefficiency. However, we find that the impact of financial players on reducing pricing gaps has been limited, even using credibly exogenous variation in financial activity to address potential exogeneity. A forward premium persists. We show that financial traders effect on the premium was limited by two barriers. First, arbitrageurs do not have unlimited access to capital. Trading was reduced during the financial crisis, when capital availability was restricted. The second is regulation, as high transaction costs imposed by the regulator restricted arbitrage. Moreover, during this period we ...
Competition and Access in Electricity Markets: ECPR, Global Price Cap, and Auctions
1997
Many network industries (telecommunications, electricity, natural gas, postal services, water and sewage services, etc.) are confronted with significant logistic and behavioral problems in their transition towards a (more) competitive environment and structure. In some of those industries, this transition is already more or less achieved while in others, it is still a project rather than a reality even if pressures to achieve such a state of reasonable competition have been mounting for quite a few years by now. It is believed that a competitive structure is the only way to credibly incite firms to provide efforts in minimizing costs and to offer to their different classes of clients and customers, both industrial and residential, the best quality products optimally matched to their specific needs. On the other hand, when different providers of goods and services are intensively engaged in a competitive process, it becomes difficult to ensure that an adequate level of coordination is taking place in order for the industry to benefit from economies of scale and in particular from economies which are external to the firms but internal to the industry. In the network industries, these economies are very important at least on specific well-identified essential links of the network. Those are subject to monopolization: they are essential inputs and would be, at least potentially, inefficiently provided if more than one producer was involved. If there ever existed natural monopoly sectors, these essential network links are thought to be perfect examples.
Pacific Economic Review, 2000
We create an experimental spot market for electricity with demand side bidding, and use experimental methods to study the efficiency of the market and the income shares of the generators, wholesale buyers and transmission line operators. Nodal and line prices are computed on the basis of short run marginal costs, energy losses in transmission, and network opportunity costs when a line is constrained. We find that a traditional, competitive model, which yields congestion rents for the transmission line owners, does not explain the observed bidding behavior; and that subtle differences in institutional rules can cause changes in market efficiency.
The competitive role of the transmission system in price-regulated power industries
Energy Economics, 2008
This note shows how the transmission system can enhance competition in price-regulated power industries, thus extending earlier findings reported in the literature for deregulated industries. In the context of a two-technology, price-regulated power industry, we show that the interconnection of two markets initially supplied by a different monopoly reduces market power and raises welfare. We also show that the capacity of the transmission line plays a key role in determining whether market equilibrium lies closer to competition or monopoly.