Clinical Outcome of Residual Liver Volume and Hepatic Steatosis After Right-Lobe Living-Donor Hepatectomy (original) (raw)
Related papers
Factors Affecting Liver Regeneration in Living Donors After Hepatectomy
Medical Science Monitor
Departmental sources Background: The safety of living liver donors is the paramount priority of liver transplantation surgeons. The liver has an effective regeneration capacity. The regeneration rate of the liver remnant in living liver donors provides much information useful in liver surgery. The outcome of the remnant liver after hepatectomy can be affected by many different perioperative factors. Material/Methods: A total of 46 patients were enrolled in the study. Retrospective clinical data, including preoperative and postoperative early and late computed tomography liver volumetry measurements, estimated resection volumes, resected liver weights, and postoperative laboratory values, were statistically evaluated according to the liver resection type. Results: No significant difference was detected in age, sex, calculated and computed tomography estimated total liver volume, intraoperative Hb decrease, postoperative complications, or postoperative portal vein flow rate. Postoperative liver enlargement rates were significant higher in the right hemihepatectomy (RHH) group than in the left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) group. The size of the liver remnant or graft has a major effect on regeneration rate. Postoperative biliary leakage did not have any significant effect on liver regeneration. No posthepatectomy liver failure was detected among the liver donors. Conclusions: Liver hypertrophy depends on the extent of liver resection. The cause of volume decrease in the LLS group after hepatectomy in our series appears to be the gradual atrophy of liver segment 4. RHH and LLS surgeries differ from each other in terms of resected liver volume, as well as inflammatory activity, and the latter appears to affect liver regeneration.
Liver Transplantation, 2012
Early liver regeneration was studied in a series of 70 patients who underwent right hepatectomy for living donation between November 2004 and January 2010. Liver regeneration was evaluated with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) at a mean of 61.07 days after surgery. Presurgical variables [eg, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), liver function tests, creatinine levels, platelet counts, international normalized ratio, and glucose levels] and variables detected with preoperative MDCT imaging [eg, main portal vein diameter, steatosis, original liver volume, and spleen volume (SV)] were investigated as potential predictors of liver regeneration. The future remnant liver volume (FRLV) was preoperatively calculated with a virtual surgical cut. Liver function tests and creatinine levels were recorded on the 30th postoperative day. In addition, the onset of postoperative complications occurring within 90 days of surgery was analyzed, and the complications were codified according to the 5 tiers of the Clavien-Dindo classification. In 26 of the 70 patients (37.14%), 100% or greater hepatic regeneration had occurred at 2 months. There was no association between the clinical outcome and the liver regeneration rate. A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that a higher BMI (coefficient ¼ 0.035, P < 0.0001) and preoperative parameters such as a smaller FRLV (coefficient ¼ À0.002, P < 0.0001) and a greater SV/FRLV ratio (coefficient ¼ 1.196, P < 0.0001) were predictors of greater liver regeneration. Liver Transpl 18:907-913, 2012. V C 2012 AASLD.
Vaccines
Background: Inflammation and the associated immune pathways are among the most important factors in liver regeneration after living donor hepatectomy. Various biomarkers, especially liver function tests, are used to show liver regeneration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the course of liver regeneration following donor hepatectomy (LDH) by routine and regeneration-related biomarkers. Method: Data from 63 living liver donors (LLDs) who underwent LDH in Inonu University Liver Transplant Institute were prospectively analyzed. Serum samples were obtained on the preoperative day and postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, 5, 10, and 21. Regenerative markers including alfa-fetoprotein (AFP), des carboxy prothrombin (DCP), ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4), and angiotensin-converting enzyme isotype II (ACEII) and liver function tests including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase...
Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2018
Right lobe living donor (2/3rd partial hepatectomy) model is the best way to accurately study liver regeneration process in human beings. We aimed to study the kinetics of liver regeneration after 2/3rd partial hepatectomy in donors. Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained volumetric recovery data in donors was performed in 23 donors, who underwent 29 contrast-enhanced computed tomography within 3 months for various clinical indications. The absolute volumetric growth percentages were as follows: 37.60 ± 21.74 at 1st week, 92 ± 53.27 at 2nd week, 115.55 ± 59.65 at 4th week, and 110.79 ± 64.47 at 3 months. On sub-group analysis of our cohort, we found that 4.3%, 17%, 30.4%, and 39% donors attended ≥ 90% volumetric recovery at 1st, 2nd, 4th week, and 3 months, respectively. One patient at 4th week revealed 128% volumetric recovery. There was one more patient who exceeded original total liver volumes (TLV) (111% of TLV) at 2.5 months. The serum bilirubin and INR values peake...
Liver regeneration in donors and adult recipients after living donor liver transplantation
Liver Transplantation, 2008
In living donor liver transplantation, the safety of the donor operation is the highest priority. The introduction of the right lobe graft was late because of concerns about donor safety. We investigated donor liver regeneration by the types of resected segments as well as recipients to assess that appropriate regeneration was occurring. Eighty-seven donors were classified into 3 groups: left lateral section donors, left lobe donors, and right lobe donors. Forty-seven adult recipients were classified as either left or right lobe grafted recipients. Volumetry was retrospectively performed at 1 week, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year after the operation. In the right lobe donor group, the remnant liver volume was 45.4%, and it rapidly increased to 68.9% at 1 month and 89.8% at 6 months. At 6 months, the regeneration ratios were almost the same in all donor groups. The recipient liver volume increased rapidly until 2 months, exceeding the standard liver volume, and then gradually decreased to 90% of the standard liver volume. Livers of the right lobe donor group regenerated fastest in the donor groups, and the recipient liver regenerated faster than the donor liver. Analyzing liver regeneration many times with a large number of donors enabled us to understand the normal liver regeneration pattern. Although the donor livers did not reach their initial volume, the donors showed normal liver function at 1 year. The donors have returned to their normal daily activities. Donor hepatectomy, even right hepatectomy, can be safely performed with accurate preoperative volumetry and careful decision-making concerning graft-type selection.
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2019
Background Regeneration of the remnant liver in early postoperative period determines the outcome in live liver donors (LLDs). The aim of the current study is to evaluate the factors that influence liver regeneration following live donor hepatectomy. Methods Total liver volume (TLV), estimated graft volume (EGV), and remnant liver volume (RLV) were calculated preoperatively in a prospective study of 154 LLDs. Absolute and percentage growth of remnant liver (regeneration index) in donor was estimated at 7th postoperative day (POD) by computed tomography (CT) volumetric analysis. Results One hundred eighteen donors underwent right hepatectomy (RH), 29 underwent left hepatectomy (LH), 6 donors had left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), and one had right posterior sectionectomy. The median percentage growth of remnant liver at the end of the first week was 46.14% (51.74%, 35.32%, and 17.38% for RH, LH, and LLS, respectively). On univariate analysis, female donors (p = 0.051), RH graft (p = 0.001), no steatosis on ultrasonography (p = 0.042), lower TLV (p = 0.029), RLV (p = < 0.001), RLV-to-body weight ratio (RLVBWR) (p = < 0.001), preoperative alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (p = 0.017), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (p = 0.035) and higher POD 7 alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (p = 0.033), and POD 7 gammaglutamyl transferase GGT (p = 0.006) were found to be predictors of greater liver regeneration. Among them, lower RLV (P = 0.008), RLVBWR (p = 0.011), and preoperative ALT level (p = 0.021) were most significant factors predictive of liver regeneration on logistic regression analysis with backward elimination. Conclusion The liver regenerates rapidly in LLDs following hepatectomy. Low RLV, RLVBWR, and preoperative ALT levels were predictors of liver regeneration in the first week following donor hepatectomy.
Impact of steatotic grafts on initial function and prognosis after liver transplantation
Transplantation Proceedings, 2004
Steatotic grafts are considered a risk factor for dysfunction or even primary nonfunction of liver transplants; grafts with more than 50% fatty infiltration are routinely discarded. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis on postoperative initial liver function and prognosis by comparing outcomes to nonsteatotic grafts in 48 liver transplantation patients. Fifteen grafts had macrovesicular steatosis, 13 (27.09%) up to 50% fatty infiltration (MG2), and 2 (4.16%) more than 50% (MG3). Thirty-three (69.75%) grafts had no macrovesicular steatosis (MG1). Initial liver function was adequate in 26 (78.78%), 10 (76.93), and 2 (100%) patients, respectively, in subgroups MG1, MG2, and MG3 (P ϭ .892). Thirty-day survival rates were 90.90%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, in subgroups MG1, MG2, and MG3 (P ϭ .606). Twenty-six grafts showed microvesicular steatosis: 18 (37.50%) showed less than 50% fatty infiltration (mG2), and 8 (16.67%) more than 50% (mG3). Twenty-two (45.83%) grafts had no microvesicular steatosis (mG1). Initial liver function was adequate in 16 (72.72%), 16 (88.88%), and 6 (75%) patients, respectively, in subgroups mG1, mG2, and mG3 (P ϭ .547). Thirty-day survival rates were 90.90%, 100%, and 87.5% respectively, in subgroups mG1, mG2, and mG3 (P ϭ .380). In conclusion, macrovesicular and microvesicular steatotic liver grafts displayed adequate initial function, did not compromise survival, and thus should not be routinely discarded.
Liver Regeneration in 120 Consecutive Living-Related Liver Donors
Transplantation Proceedings, 2009
Background. Living-related liver transplantation for pediatric patients has become an acceptable, low-risk treatment option. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of donor liver regeneration. Materials and Methods. Between October 1999 and January 2008, 120 living-related donors provided 109 grafts consisting of segments II and III and 11 grafts consisting of segments II, III, and IV. Volumetric assessment of the donor liver and selected segments was performed using computed tomography. After procurement every graft was weighed. At 7 and 30 days, as well as 12 months after the operation the donor liver remnant was evaluated for differences in volume. Results. A significant correlation was observed between the liver graft mass and its volume as assessed by computed tomography (r ϭ 0.781; P Ͻ .05). Twelve months after procurement, the average regeneration index was significantly higher among donors of segments II, III, and IV (144 Ϯ 23%) versus donors of segments II and III (114 Ϯ 15%; P Ͻ .05). Conclusion. Liver regeneration after procurement of selected liver segments from living donors is a consistent finding. Computed tomography is an accurate imaging modality to track changes in liver volume. This study showed a positive correlation between the size of the liver graft and the regeneration of the liver remnant in the donor.