Comparison of acetabulum posterior wall fractures and fracture dislocations: dislocation does not affect clinical and radiological outcomes (original) (raw)
Related papers
International Archives of Medicine, 2012
There are situations which the tomographic exam is done on the affected hip or situations where the contralateral hip presents abnormalities that make it impossible to compare. In this study we aimed to evaluate a tomographic index that does not require comparison between the both hips. Twenty two patients with unilateral acetabular fracture dislocation with fracture of posterior wall were studied. We established the relationship between the remaining posterior wall and the femoral head diameter (head/wall index-H/W index). We evaluated 45 two-dimensional computed tomography scan in normal hips and established the H/W index. In 45 normal hips we simulated a posterior wall fracture with involvement of 25% and 30% of the posterior wall and calculated the H/W index. We divided into five groups with five different H/W index (fractured group with non surgical treatment; fractured group; normal group; normal group with simulated fracture of 25% and; 30% of the posterior wall). 2.4 was the lowest limit of confidence interval of the group with 25% of the posterior wall fracture. When we analyzed the confidence interval of the 30% fracture group the upper limit of the confidence interval was 2.7, close to the lower limit of the surgical group that was 2.9. Thus, we suggest the 2.4 the H/W index limit as an auxiliary criteria to indicate whether or not to operate. H/W index is helpful to decide whether or not surgery indication in the fracture dislocation of the posterior wall of the acetabulum.
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 2019
Background: Modern treatment principles for posterior wall fractures have become widespread in the last decade in many countries by means of international or local courses. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of acetabulum posterior wall fractures using unconventional methods of fixation, including plates placed in unusual directions, or, in the case of reoperation, only interfragmentary screws. In addition, we examined acetabulum posterior wall fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation with standard undercountered plates from ischion to iliac bone in latter cases. Methods: Twenty-one patients who had open reduction and internal fixation of an unstable unilateral fracture of the posterior wall of the acetabulum between 2009 and 2013 were included. Group 1 was composed of 10 former patients who were treated with unconventional methods that included a compression technique with a direct plate or solely screw fixation. Group 2 was composed of latter 11 patients who were treated with standard surgery that included undercountered plates oriented from the ischial tuberosity to the iliac bone proximally and reconstruction of marginal impaction if necessary. The functional outcome was evaluated with the use of the clinical grading system adopted by Merle d'Aubign e and Postel. The KellgreneLawrence radiologic criteria were used for the radiologic assessments. The reduction of the fracture, posterior dislocation, marginal impaction, mean fracture particle amount, trochanteric osteotomy and avascular necrosis were compared between the two groups and examined with the ManneWhitney U test. Results: In Groups 1 and 2, the median score of the modified Merle d'Aubign e and Postel clinical scoring system was 16 (8e18) and 18 (14e18), respectively. The clinical scores between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.01). When two groups were compared using the KellgreneLawrence radiographic criteria for the development of osteoarthritis, the median value in Groups 1 and 2 was 3 (0e4) and 1 (0e3), respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study displays the evolution of the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures of the posterior wall in our clinic. The older methods failed in terms of exposure, diagnosis of fracture anatomy and fixation techniques. Patients treated after the surgeons took courses in this field showed evidence of superior clinical and radiological scores. We attribute these benefits to exposure, definition and treatment of marginal impaction and fixation principles.
Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae Et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 2013
PURPOUSE Of THE STUDy Associated transverse and posterior wall fractures account for approximately 20% of all acetabular fractures. To asses the risk of these concommitant bone injuries on early joint failure despite a high rate of postoperative congruency. MATERIAL The analysis of 104 surgically treated patients with associated transverse and posterior wall fractures showed that more than half of these patients had associated injuries. The mean age was 35 years, and > 75% of these patients were male. A high energy trauma was the trauma mechanism in 94.2%. The mean ISS was 26.3 points. The majority of patients showed a juxta-or transtectal fracture line. The mean articular fracture displacement was 13.5 mm. 87.5% of the patients showed a femoral head dislocation. An acetabular roof comminution was present in 16.3%. 20.2% of patients received a fracture related preoperative nerve injury to the sciatic nerve. METHODS Osteosynthesis was performed 9.9 days after trauma. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach was used in > 90% for stabilization with a combination of plate and screw fixation in 71.1%. The mean operative time was 190 minutes with a blood loss of 855 ml. Postoperatively the hip joint was congruent in 90.3% with anatomical or near-anatomical joint reconstruction in > 90%. Iatrogenic nerve injury occurred in 12 patients (8.9%). RESULTS 67 patients (67.7%) could be followed after a mean of 42.7 months. The average subjective visual Analog Scale pain score was 42.7. Mild or no pain was seen in 58.2%. The mean Merle d'Aubigné score was 15.4 with 56.7% of patients having a functionally perfect or good result. 52.2% had no post-traumatic osteoarthritic changes of their hip joint. A joint failure was diagnosed in 32.8% of the patients. Analyzing only patients with anatomically reconstructed hip joints, patients showed comparable results with 61.3% having no or mild pain and 59.2% a good or excellent functional result. Posttraumatic arthrotic changes occur in only 26.5% of these patients. A joint failure was present in 32.7%. In this group, a joint failure was significantly more likely to be present with an additional acetabular comminution zone. CONCLUSION Associated transverse and posterior wall fractures have a significant risk of early joint failure despite a high rate of postoperative congruency.
A retrospective analysis of different treatments of posterior acetabular wall fracture
Srpski Arhiv Za Celokupno Lekarstvo, 2023
Introduction/Objective The objective of the paper is an analysis of clinical outcomes of non-surgical conservative and operative management of patients with posterior acetabular wall fractures. Methods We investigated 88 fractures of the acetabular joint, 31 of which were treated surgically and 57 non-surgically. Only screws or reconstruction plates and screws were used for surgical treatment and traction in patients who underwent nonsurgical treatment. The study period lasted at least three years. The measures used to assess the outcome of operative, surgical and non-operative, conservative approach were Merle d'Aubigné modified score, Harris hip score, and Matta's radiometric criteria. Results Matta's evaluation criteria showed an excellent score of 40.4% in conservatively treated patients; 19.4% in patients who underwent surgery; a good score of 49.1% in conservatively treated patients; and 48.4% in patients who underwent surgery. Comparation between two patient groups differently treated, by Merle d'Aubigné tool, showed excellent results for 56.1% conservatively treated patients and 25.8% in those patients who underwent surgery, and good results in 29.8% conservatively treated patients and 38.7% in patients who underwent surgery. Harris hip score (excellent results were showed in 54.4% for non-operative-treated patients) also showed statistical significance, p < 0.005. Conclusion Proper diagnostics and a proper definitive diagnosis can help avoid surgical treatment if the fracture cannot be treated surgically, making the postoperative period more comfortable for the patient.
Long term results after surgical management of posterior wall acetabular fractures
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2014
Background Posterior wall fractures are the most common of all acetabular fractures, and there is universal consensus that displaced fractures are best treated with anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation. Though early and mid term results for such studies are available, few shed light on long term results. This study was performed to evaluate long term functional and radiological outcomes in patients with posterior wall acetabular fractures and to determine factors that may contribute adversely to a satisfactory final outcome. Materials and methods We retrospectively analysed the hospital records for patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for posterior wall acetabular fractures. Twenty-five patients (20 men, five women), including one with bilateral posterior wall fracture, with a mean age of 41.28 ± 7.16 years (range 25-60 years) and a mean follow-up of 12.92 ± 6.36 years (range 5-22 years) who met the inclusion criteria formed the study cohort.
An unusual pattern of posterior wall fracture of acetabulum
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, 2020
Background This study aims to describe an uncommon presentation of posterior wall acetabular fracture-dislocation with displacement of fracture fragment anterior to femoral head with its management and clinico-radiological outcome. Methods This retrospective review was performed at a Level I trauma centre over a period of six years. Hospital records, radiological database, operative register and follow-up data identified 7 patients with anteriorly lying posterior wall fragment of acetabulum. Analysis was performed with 6 patients having complete follow-up ranging from 2 to 7 years. The patients were operated with standard Kocher-Langenbeck approach; modification of this approach with trochanteric flip osteotomy and safe surgical dislocation was performed based on the location of the anteriorly lying fragment. Final functional and radiographic outcome was analysed according to modified Merle D'Aubigné and Postel score, and Matta's grade, respectively. Results This uncommon presentation was observed in 11.11% of patients out of 63 patients with isolated posterior wall acetabular fractures managed during the study period. Anteriorly displaced posterior wall fragment was located in anterosuperior (n, 3), anterocentral (n, 2) and anteroinferior (n, 1) quadrants anterior to the femoral head. Final clinical and radiographic outcome revealed good-to-excellent outcome in 5 (83.33%) patients, and poor in one. One patient developed progressive arthrosis of hip which required total hip arthroplasty within 2 years. Conclusion This unusual pattern of posterior wall fracture requires adequate pre-operative planning, careful handling of the fractured fragments along with its soft tissue attachments during surgery, and preferably a concomitant trochanteric flip osteotomy with/without surgical hip dislocation to achieve good results.
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2009
We examined patients affected by a posterior wall fracture of the acetabulum treated with a minimally invasive posterior approach (from 12 to 18 cm). During 2004-2006 19 patients were treated by this approach. 4 patients had a combined surgery by the ileo-inguinal approach. Fracture fixation was performed using reconstruction plates and screws. All the patients were studied with typical X-rays projection for pelvis and iliac oblique view and obturator oblique view (Judet view) and CT scan with 3D reconstruction. After 3 months a CT scan was performed on about 30% of our patients, which demonstrated the perfect healing of the fractures. The most important advantages we observed using this approach were a lesser split of the gluteus maximus and no risk of damage for the superior gluteal nerve. In the early post-operative rehabilitation we examined the trophism of the gluteus maximus, which was found to be better than in patients treated with the typical Kocher-Langenbeck approach. The only absolute contraindication for this technique is in obese patients. The post-operative complications include one case of heterotypic ossification of the gluteus minimus and one case of peronealnerve palsy with the spontaneous and complete recovery within 6 months. According to our experience this kind of approach could be used for posterior wall fracture of the pelvis and it can be extended to transverse fractures. In the post-operative period the greatest advantage is the lesser muscle damage and therefore a most effective rehabilitation.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2006
We have evaluated the functional, clinical and radiological outcome of patients with simple and complex acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall, and identified factors associated with an adverse outcome. We reviewed 128 patients treated operatively for a fracture involving the posterior wall of the acetabulum between 1982 and 1999. The Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment and Short-Form 36 scores, the presence of radiological arthritis and complications were assessed as a function of injury, treatment and clinical variables. The patients had profound functional deficits compared with the normal population. Anatomical reduction alone was not sufficient to restore function. The fracture pattern, marginal impaction and residual displacement of > 2 mm were associated with the development of arthritis, which related to poor function and the need for hip replacement. It may be appropriate to consider immediate total hip replacement for patients aged > 50 years with margin...