Sprinklatun terveyskeskuksen polttokokeet (original) (raw)

Viljasta verkostoihin : Huoltovarmuuskeskuksen arviointi

Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö, 2021

The aim of this evaluation report is to provide an insight into the operation, management and effectiveness of the security of supply organization in the national security of supply system based on a comprehensive analysis, and to present conclusions and recommendations for their development. The evaluation calls for a broader perspective on security of supply. The experience of the corona crisis has reinforced what ever-increasing global interdependence has led to throughout the 21st century: preparedness can no longer be made from the perspective of narrow, isolated sectors or industries.The National Emergency Supply Agency (NESA) has a strong profile in cooperation with the business community in managing continuity. This work is carried out mainly through so called pool activities. Based on the feedback from the pool discussions and the eSurvey, the NESA can be considered to have succeeded reasonably well in this task. On the other hand, the NESA´s cooperation with ministries is somewhat less consistent. In the case of industries that clearly cover statutory tasks, cooperation with ministries is closer. In other ministries' preparedness development activities, the The National Emergency Supply Agency does not appear to be a that close partner. The assessment report pays special attention to the steering and system of governance of the overall security of supply organization. At present, the control and decision-making system appears to be somewhat unstructured in terms of security of supply decisions, the performance management and steering, and the NESA´s Board's steering role. The report draws particular attention to the lack of transparency in the use of the Security Supply Fund. The multi-annual financing of program activities through the Fund by decisions of the NESA Board does not comply with the spirit of the State Budget Act and the principle of budget completeness. The evaluation report presents three ideal models through which it would be possible to develop the Finnish security of supply system in the future. The models are: 1) the current model with minor improvements, 2) the Security of Supply Agency and 3) the National Preparedness Center. For each model, there is a separate examination of their strengths and weaknesses. In addition, at the end of the evaluation report, there are 8 development recommendations that are independent of the models described above..